IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10115-d889291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Rural Landscape Preference Based on TikTok Short Video Content and User Comments

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Min Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Zhen Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

Abstract

Landscape is the visual embodiment of the human–environment relationship. It is an important field for understanding and shaping the relationship between human society and the environment, and it is also the focus of multidisciplinary attention. Rural landscape construction is of great significance to the development of rural tourism and rural revitalization. The results and preferences from landscape evaluation are an important basis for landscape construction. This paper selected 222 rural landscape short video works published on the TikTok short video platform; extracted the basic elements of rural landscapes using video content analysis and according to grounded theory; condensed 32 basic categories and 12 main categories; and formed a rural landscape system composed of three core categories: rural ecological, living, and productive landscapes. The short video user comment data were mined using ROST CM6 software, to analyze the rural landscape preferences of video viewers. The results showed that the short video users had a high overall evaluation of rural landscapes, but there were differences among the three core rural landscape preference categories. Users had a high preference for the architectural landscape and ecological landscape in the rural lifestyle landscape but raised concerns about the impact of disharmonious infrastructure and service facilities, existing security risks, and environmental health on the rural landscape. This paper suggests that we should pay attention to the construction of rural artistic conceptions and the expression of nostalgia, enhance experiences to enhance perception, and strengthen the protection of natural and cultural landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Chen & Min Wang & Zhen Zhang, 2022. "Research on Rural Landscape Preference Based on TikTok Short Video Content and User Comments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10115-:d:889291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Depietri, Yaella & Ghermandi, Andrea & Campisi-Pinto, Salvatore & Orenstein, Daniel E., 2021. "Public participation GIS versus geolocated social media data to assess urban cultural ecosystem services: Instances of complementarity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    2. Targetti, S. & Raggi, M. & Zavalloni, M. & Viaggi, D., 2021. "Perceived benefits from reclaimed rural landscapes: Evidence from the lowlands of the Po River Delta, Italy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Sara Hadavi & Rachel Kaplan & MaryCarol R. Hunter, 2018. "How does perception of nearby nature affect multiple aspects of neighbourhood satisfaction and use patterns?," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 360-379, April.
    4. Diego Valbuena & Julien G. Chenet & Daniel Gaitán-Cremaschi, 2021. "Options to Support Sustainable Trajectories in a Rural Landscape: Drivers, Rural Processes, and Local Perceptions in a Colombian Coffee-Growing Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shengyuan Li & Zhonghua Gou, 2023. "Accepting Solar Photovoltaic Panels in Rural Landscapes: The Tangle among Nostalgia, Morality, and Economic Stakes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Siyao Liu & Bin Yu & Chan Xu & Min Zhao & Jing Guo, 2022. "Characteristics of Collective Resilience and Its Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Psychological Emotion: A Case Study of COVID-19 in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Yue Xu & Zhihua Yin & Haohui Liu & Mingzhu Sun & Zhen Guo & Bo Liu, 2023. "Model Construction of Chinese Preservice Physical Education Teachers’ Perception of Social Media: A Grounded Theory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-34, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huixin Wang & Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Duy Thong Ta & Qian Wang & Jiao Zhang & Daer Su & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay between Landscape Planning and Human Well-Being: A Scientometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Daymond, Tahlia & Andrew, Margaret E. & Kobryn, Halina T., 2023. "Crowdsourcing social values data: Flickr and public participation GIS provide different perspectives of ecosystem services in a remote coastal region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Qinqin Shi & Hai Chen & Di Liu & Tianwei Geng & Hang Zhang, 2022. "Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Clara García-Mayor & Almudena Nolasco-Cirugeda, 2023. "New Approach to Landscape-Based Spatial Planning Using Meaningful Geolocated Digital Traces," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Sanqin Mao & Jie Chen, 2021. "Residential Mobility and Post-Move Community Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Huai, Songyao & Chen, Fen & Liu, Song & Canters, Frank & Van de Voorde, Tim, 2022. "Using social media photos and computer vision to assess cultural ecosystem services and landscape features in urban parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Schirpke, Uta & Ghermandi, Andrea & Sinclair, Michael & Van Berkel, Derek & Fox, Nathan & Vargas, Leonardo & Willemen, Louise, 2023. "Emerging technologies for assessing ecosystem services: A synthesis of opportunities and challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Wang, Zhifang & Fu, Hongpeng & Jian, Yuqing & Qureshi, Salman & Jie, Hua & Wang, Lu, 2022. "On the comparative use of social media data and survey data in prioritizing ecosystem services for cost-effective governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    9. Gugulica, Madalina & Burghardt, Dirk, 2023. "Mapping indicators of cultural ecosystem services use in urban green spaces based on text classification of geosocial media data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Weiwei Liu & Wenqing Xu & Monica (Shu-Fen) Wu, 2022. "The Effect of Tourist-to-Tourist Interaction on Life Satisfaction: A Mediation Role of Social Connectedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Antonella Samoggia & Andrea Fantini, 2023. "Revealing the Governance Dynamics of the Coffee Chain in Colombia: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10115-:d:889291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.