IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10043-d888330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Method to Assist Decision-Making of Water Environmental Emergency in Expressway Region

Author

Listed:
  • Qing’e Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Mengmeng Su

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Lei Zeng

    (Guangzhou Expressway Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510288, China)

  • Huihua Chen

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

Water environmental emergency (WEE) in expressway region is a special kind of risk event with several characteristics, such as rarity, unconventionality, and harmfulness. The emergency decision-making (EDM) features, procedures, and methods are considerably different from the general decision-making problems. EDM quality is directly related to the timely implementation of a reasonable emergency plan. Therefore, methods should be developed to respond to emergencies immediately and scientifically and minimize the damage to water environment. This work introduces risk source identification and emergency classification and develops an emergency decision model based on scenario retrieval and case-based reasoning, according to the existing EDM model and characteristics of WEE in expressway region. The proposed method is validated through case analysis of Daguang expressway in China. This method provides an effective solution for EDM of WEEs in expressway region. The emergency measures can be implemented quickly and effectively after the occurrence of water environmental emergencies to control pollution events, provide scientific and feasible action guides for emergency processes, and enrich the case base of decision-making systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing’e Wang & Mengmeng Su & Lei Zeng & Huihua Chen, 2022. "A New Method to Assist Decision-Making of Water Environmental Emergency in Expressway Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10043-:d:888330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Long & Yilin Yang & Xiaohui Lei & Yu Tian & Youming Li, 2019. "Integrated Assessment Method of Emergency Plan for Sudden Water Pollution Accidents Based on Improved TOPSIS, Shannon Entropy and a Coordinated Development Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Qinge Wang & He Cao & Huanan Yu & Luwei Zhao & Jinchan Fan & Yingqing Wang, 2020. "Experimental Study on Purification Effect of Biochemical Pool Model for Treatment of Pavement Runoff by Aquatic Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Kotireddy, Rajesh & Hoes, Pieter-Jan & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2018. "A methodology for performance robustness assessment of low-energy buildings using scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 428-442.
    4. Parfait K. Kouamé & Gilbert Fokou & Amoin Jeanne d’Arc Koffi & Amidou Sani & Bassirou Bonfoh & Kouassi Dongo, 2022. "Assessing Institutional Stakeholders’ Perception and Limitations on Coping Strategies in Flooding Risk Management in West Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Mark A. Ehlen & Vanessa N. Vargas, 2013. "Multi-hazard, multi-infrastructure, economic scenario analysis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 60-75, March.
    6. Yousra Tourki & Jeffrey Keisler & Igor Linkov, 2013. "Scenario analysis: a review of methods and applications for engineering and environmental systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 3-20, March.
    7. Jiyong Ding & Juefang Cai & Guangxiang Guo & Chen Chen, 2018. "An Emergency Decision-Making Method for Urban Rainstorm Water-Logging: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Qingsheng Li & Jinliang Huang & Cui Wang & Heshan Lin & Jiwei Zhang & Jinlong Jiang & Bingkun Wang, 2017. "Land Development Suitability Evaluation of Pingtan Island Based on Scenario Analysis and Landscape Ecological Quality Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Xiaowen Ding & Ping Fang, 2019. "Accident Trend Prediction of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Heshangshan Drinking Water Source Area Based on Integrating a Two-Dimensional Water Quality Model and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanessa N. Vargas & Mark A. Ehlen, 2013. "REAcct: a scenario analysis tool for rapidly estimating economic impacts of major natural and man-made hazards," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 76-88, March.
    2. Hendry, David F. & Pretis, Felix, 2023. "Analysing differences between scenarios," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 754-771.
    3. Dwi Sartika Adetama & Akhmad Fauzi & Bambang Juanda & Dedi Budiman Hakim, 2021. "Measurement of Composites Index on Low Carbon Development Supporting Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Chévez, Pedro Joaquín & Martini, Irene & Discoli, Carlos, 2019. "Methodology developed for the construction of an urban-energy diagnosis aimed to assess alternative scenarios: An intra-urban approach to foster cities’ sustainability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 751-778.
    5. Umberto Berardi & Lamberto Tronchin & Massimiliano Manfren & Benedetto Nastasi, 2018. "On the Effects of Variation of Thermal Conductivity in Buildings in the Italian Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Golghamat Raad, Nima & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2024. "A hybrid scenario-based fuzzy stochastic model for closed-loop dry port network design with multiple robustness measures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Mohammadi, Zahra & Hoes, Pieter Jan & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2020. "Simulation-based design optimization of houses with low grid dependency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1185-1202.
    8. Andjelka Kelic & Zachary A. Collier & Christopher Brown & Walter E. Beyeler & Alexander V. Outkin & Vanessa N. Vargas & Mark A. Ehlen & Christopher Judson & Ali Zaidi & Billy Leung & Igor Linkov, 2013. "Decision framework for evaluating the macroeconomic risks and policy impacts of cyber attacks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 544-560, December.
    9. Frauke Hoss & Kelly Klima & Paul Fischbeck, 2014. "Ten strategies to systematically exploit all options to cope with anthropogenic climate change," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 578-590, December.
    10. Parker, Andrew M. & Srinivasan, Sinduja V. & Lempert, Robert J. & Berry, Sandra H., 2015. "Evaluating simulation-derived scenarios for effective decision support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 64-77.
    11. Chunjiang An & Mengfan Cai & Christophe Guy, 2020. "Rural Sustainable Environmental Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-5, August.
    12. Zhiming Li & Zhengxi Fan & Shiguang Shen, 2018. "Urban Green Space Suitability Evaluation Based on the AHP-CV Combined Weight Method: A Case Study of Fuping County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Dmitry Borisoglebsky & Liz Varga, 2019. "A Resilience Toolbox and Research Design for Black Sky Hazards to Power Grids," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, June.
    14. Tronchin, Lamberto & Manfren, Massimiliano & James, Patrick AB., 2018. "Linking design and operation performance analysis through model calibration: Parametric assessment on a Passive House building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 26-40.
    15. Kamali, Behnaz & Ziaei, Ali Naghi & Beheshti, Aliasghar & Farmani, Raziyeh, 2022. "An open-source toolbox for investigating functional resilience in sewer networks based on global resilience analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    16. Thomas P. Bostick & Thomas H. Holzer & Shahryar Sarkani, 2017. "Enabling Stakeholder Involvement in Coastal Disaster Resilience Planning," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1181-1200, June.
    17. Walker, Linus & Hischier, Illias & Schlueter, Arno, 2022. "Scenario-based robustness assessment of building system life cycle performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    18. Li, Xiaozhu & Wang, Weiqing & Wang, Haiyun, 2021. "Hybrid time-scale energy optimal scheduling strategy for integrated energy system with bilateral interaction with supply and demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Shan Ren & Pei Song & Haichun Cheng & Chao Liu & Rongsheng Chen, 2022. "Enhanced Treatment of Decentralized Domestic Sewage Using Gravity-Flow Multi-Soil-Layering Systems Coupled with Iron-Carbon Microelectrolysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Xiaowen Ding & Ping Fang, 2019. "Accident Trend Prediction of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Heshangshan Drinking Water Source Area Based on Integrating a Two-Dimensional Water Quality Model and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10043-:d:888330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.