IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9607-d880273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“ We’ve Always Been Kind of Kicked to the Curb ”: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Discrimination Experiences among College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Cindy Mahoney

    (Department of Health Science and Human Ecology, Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Benjamin J. Becerra

    (Department of Information and Decision Sciences, Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Devin Arias

    (Department of Health Science and Human Ecology, Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Jacqueline E. Romano

    (Department of Teacher Education and Foundations, Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Monideepa B. Becerra

    (Department of Health Science and Human Ecology, Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

Abstract

Background: Experiences of discrimination are prevalent among minority populations, although often empirical evidence does not provide depth into the source and types of discrimination, such as racial/ethnic, gender-based, age, etc. The goal of this study was to assess the unique patterns, types, and sources of discrimination experiences that college students face and explore the role these experiences play in their mental health. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was utilized. Quantitative assessment of college students from a Hispanic and minority-serving institution was conducted to evaluate experiences of discrimination and its association to physical health and mental health (including psychological distress), as well as food insecurity, a marker for poverty. Next, qualitative data were thematically analyzed to further provide an in depth understanding on the sources of such experiences, types of discriminations, as well as the impact on mental health. Results: Results of the quantitative assessment highlight that discrimination was prevalent among the population with a higher everyday discrimination score significantly associated with serious psychological distress, low mental health status, low physical health status, and being food insecure. Further, most of the participants reported that they felt discriminated due to their appearance, with race/ethnicity and skin color as next most commonly cited reasons. Qualitative assessment further demonstrates distinct types of discrimination experiences from a variety of sources. Within a family, colorism and having an American accent while speaking a native language was a predominant source, while among peers, having a non-American accent was a primary source of discrimination experiences. Such experiences based on elitism, gender, and age (being younger) from the workplace were prevalent among the target population. Finally, feelings of isolation, not belonging, as well as negative impact on self-efficacy and self-worth were noted. Conclusion: Experiences of discrimination are prevalent among college students, including from within family and peers. To improve mental health outcomes of such a population, campus-based measures are needed to promote resiliency and social support, as well as community-based initiatives to promote workplace training to create inclusive environments for younger generations entering the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Cindy Mahoney & Benjamin J. Becerra & Devin Arias & Jacqueline E. Romano & Monideepa B. Becerra, 2022. "“ We’ve Always Been Kind of Kicked to the Curb ”: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Discrimination Experiences among College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9607-:d:880273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9607/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9607/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monideepa B. Becerra & Benjamin J. Becerra, 2020. "Psychological Distress among College Students: Role of Food Insecurity and Other Social Determinants of Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Pam Phojanakong & Emily Brown Weida & Gabriella Grimaldi & Félice Lê-Scherban & Mariana Chilton, 2019. "Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination Are Associated with Food Insecurity and Poor Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandria J. Drake & Lora A. Phillips & Brajesh Karna & Shakthi Bharathi Murugesan & Lily K. Villa & Nathan A. Smith, 2023. "Food insecurity and disasters: predicting disparities in total and first-time food pantry visits during the COVID-19 pandemic," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 493-504, April.
    2. Salene M.W. Jones & Katherine J. Briant & Cecy Corona & Jason A. Mendoza, 2023. "Feasibility and Validity of Using Item Response Theory to Assess Cumulative Social Risk," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1017-1032, October.
    3. Seema Mihrshahi & Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani & Janaki Amin & Alexandra Bhatti & Josephine Y. Chau & Rimante Ronto & Diana Turnip & Melanie Taylor, 2022. "Higher Prevalence of Food Insecurity and Psychological Distress among International University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Australian Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Fernando Fajardo-Bullón & Jesús Pérez-Mayo & Igor Esnaola & Isobel Anderson & Marcus Knutagård, 2020. "Influence of Psychosocial Variables on the Health of People Living in Housing Exclusion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Chukwuemeka E. Ogbu & Chisa O. Oparanma & Stella C. Ogbu & Otobo I. Ujah & Ndugba S. Chinenye & Chidera P. Ogbu & Russell S. Kirby, 2023. "Neighborhood Unsafety, Discrimination, and Food Insecurity among Nigerians Aged 15–49," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Lauren A. Clay & Ashley D. Ross, 2020. "Factors Associated with Food Insecurity Following Hurricane Harvey in Texas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Pedro G. Guzman & James E. Lange & Amanda C. McClain, 2022. "The Association between Food Security Status and Psychological Distress and Loneliness among Full-Time Undergraduate Students at a Minority-Serving Institution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Brittany M. Loofbourrow & Rachel E. Scherr, 2023. "Food Insecurity in Higher Education: A Contemporary Review of Impacts and Explorations of Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Hales, Laura J. & Coleman-Jensen, Alisha, 2024. "Household Food Insecurity Across Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2016–21," Economic Information Bulletin 341822, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Alice P. Villatoro & Vanessa L. Errisuriz & Melissa J. DuPont-Reyes, 2023. "Mental Health Needs and Services Utilization among Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Texas during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Audrey Murrell & Ray Jones, 2020. "Measuring Food Insecurity Using the Food Abundance Index: Implications for Economic, Health and Social Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9607-:d:880273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.