IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9292-d875294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age-Friendly Communities and Older Adults’ Health in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Kyeongmo Kim

    (School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

  • Thomas D. Buckley

    (Department of Psychiatry, School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Denise Burnette

    (School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jin Huang

    (School of Social Work, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA)

  • Seon Kim

    (School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

Abstract

As age-friendly community (AFC) initiatives grow, it will be essential to determine whether older adults who live in an AFC have better health than those who live in other environments. This study uses data from the 2017 AARP AFC Surveys and the AARP Livability Index to assess whether AFCs promote the health of older adults. We analyze data for 3027 adults aged 65 and older who reside in 262 zip code areas. Following AARP guidelines, we allocated the sample into two groups: an AFC group (livability score of 51+; n = 2364) and a non-AFC (score ≤ 50, n = 663). The outcome variable was self-rated health (M = 3.5; SD = 1.1; range: 1–5). We used an inverse probability weighting approach to evaluate whether older adults who live in an AFC reported better self-rated health than those who live in a non-AFC. Findings showed that older adults who lived in an AFC had better self-rated health than those in a non-AFC (b = 0.08, p = 0.027). Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, Black and Hispanic older adults reported worse self-rated health. Inasmuch as living in an AFC can promote the well-being of older adults, policymakers and practitioners should continue to develop and sustain high-quality, accessible built and social environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyeongmo Kim & Thomas D. Buckley & Denise Burnette & Jin Huang & Seon Kim, 2022. "Age-Friendly Communities and Older Adults’ Health in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9292-:d:875294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas D. Buckley, 2022. "A Scoping Review of Psychological Sense of Community among Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Warner, Mildred E. & Zhang, Xue & Rivas, Marcela González, 2020. "Which states and cities protect residents from water shutoffs in the COVID-19 pandemic?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Thomas Puvill & Jolanda Lindenberg & Jacobijn Gussekloo & Anton J M de Craen & Joris P J Slaets & Rudi G J Westendorp, 2016. "Associations of Various Health-Ratings with Geriatric Giants, Mortality and Life Satisfaction in Older People," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Xue Zhang & Mildred E. Warner & Elaine Wethington, 2020. "Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Grafova, Irina B. & Freedman, Vicki A. & Lurie, Nicole & Kumar, Rizie & Rogowski, Jeannette, 2014. "The difference-in-difference method: Assessing the selection bias in the effects of neighborhood environment on health," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 20-33.
    6. Jixiang Xu & Yingwei Chen & Yujie Wang & Junling Gao & Limei Huang, 2022. "Association between Age-Friendliness of Communities and Frailty among Older Adults: A Multilevel Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valero, Diana & Cook, Jess & Lee, Angus & Browne, Alison L. & Ellis, Rowan & Pancholi, Vidya Sagar & Hoolohan, Claire, 2023. "Addressing water poverty under climate crisis: implications for social policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Tao Zhang, 2016. "Socioeconomic determinants of obesity and hypertension at the county level in China," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 239-252, October.
    3. Jo-Ying Huang & Hui-Chuan Hsu & Yu-Ling Hsiao & Feng-Yin Chen & Shu-Ying Lo & Tzu-Yun Chou & Megan F. Liu, 2022. "Developing Indicators of Age-Friendliness in Taiwanese Communities through a Modified Delphi Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Ljunge, Martin, 2016. "Migrants, health, and happiness: Evidence that health assessments travel with migrants and predict well-being," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 35-46.
    5. Roxana Mare & Codruța Mare & Adriana Hadarean & Anca Hotupan & Tania Rus, 2023. "COVID-19 and Water Variables: Review and Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Xue Zhang & Mildred E. Warner, 2023. "Linking Urban Planning, Community Environment, and Physical Activity: A Socio-Ecological Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Mason, Kate E. & Pearce, Neil & Cummins, Steven, 2020. "Do neighbourhood characteristics act together to influence BMI? A cross-sectional study of urban parks and takeaway/fast-food stores as modifiers of the effect of physical activity facilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    8. Peter James & Jaime E. Hart & Mariana C. Arcaya & Diane Feskanich & Francine Laden & S.V. Subramanian, 2015. "Neighborhood Self-Selection: The Role of Pre-Move Health Factors on the Built and Socioeconomic Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Rivas, Marcela González & Schroering, Caitlin, 2021. "Pittsburgh's translocal social movement: A case of the new public water," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Lilah M. Besser & Willa D. Brenowitz & Oanh L. Meyer & Serena Hoermann & John Renne, 2021. "Methods to Address Self-Selection and Reverse Causation in Studies of Neighborhood Environments and Brain Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Gailey, Samantha, 2022. "Moving to greener pastures: Health selection into neighborhood green space among a highly mobile and diverse population in California," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    12. Zhang, Xue & Rivas, Marcela Gonzalez & Grant, Mary & Warner, Mildred E., 2021. "Water Pricing and Affordability in the US: Public vs Private Ownership," SocArXiv 7mc4r, Center for Open Science.
    13. Jamila Michener, 2022. "Race, power, and policy: understanding state anti-eviction policies during COVID-19 [Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 231-246.
    14. Gottemukkula Bhavani & Middhe Sreenivasulu & Ravinder V. Naik & M. Jagan Mohan Reddy & Ashwini S. Darekar & Anugu Amarender Reddy, 2022. "Impact Assessment of Seed Village Programme by Using Difference in Difference (DiD) Approach in Telangana, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Mildred E. Warner & Xue Zhang, 2020. "Healthy Places for Children: The Critical Role of Engagement, Common Vision, and Collaboration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Hanna, Thomas M. & McDonald, David A., 2021. "From pragmatic to politicized? The future of water remunicipalization in the United States," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Jiang, Changjun & Li, Jintao & Liu, Jilai, 2022. "Does urbanization affect the gap between urban and rural areas? Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    18. Mildred E Warner & Paige M Kelly & Xue Zhang, 2023. "Challenging austerity under the COVID-19 state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 197-209.
    19. Saha, Unnati Rani & Bijwaard, Govert E. & Muhajarine, Nazeem & Vrijkotte, Tanja GM., 2020. "Disadvantaged neighborhoods, birth weight, and problem behavior in five- and six-year-old pre-school children: Evidence from a cohort born in Amsterdam," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Losada-Rojas, Lisa L. & Pyrialakou, Dimitra & Waldorf, Brigitte S. & Banda, Jorge A. & Gkritza, Konstantina, 2022. "The effect of location on physical activity: Implications for active travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9292-:d:875294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.