IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9216-d873845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Corporate Image of Nursing Homes on the Loyalty of Residents’ Family Members

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Nadales Rodríguez

    (Faculty of Commerce and Management, University of Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain)

  • Guillermo Bermúdez-González

    (Faculty of Commerce and Management, University of Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain)

  • Ismael Pablo Soler-García

    (Faculty of Commerce and Management, University of Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

This study analyzes the influence of the corporate image of nursing homes on the decisions made by family members as to whether their elderly relatives will stay in the same nursing home. An empirical study was conducted considering 566 residents’ family members with the capacity to decide whether said residents will remain in the same nursing home, using a binary regression model with a logistic link function (i.e., logit). For the first time in the nursing home sector, these results show the specific variables of the corporate image that influence family members when deciding whether their elders will stay in the same nursing home. In order of importance, these variables are the level of trust conveyed by the nursing home, the investment made in the facilities, price-quality ratio, emotional connection to the nursing home, and the promotion of the nursing home’s services. The study also highlights the importance of other personal factors in family members’ decisions to keep their elders in the same nursing home, such as the family members’ employment situations (higher loyalty among those employed by third parties) and the determining factors involved in the relative’s choice of nursing home (higher loyalty among those whose choice was mainly based on humane and dignified treatment). This study offers a discussion of the theoretical contributions this research brings to academia as well as managerial implications for the industry. We believe that one future line of research should be continued after the COVID-19 pandemic comes to an end to compare the results and observe whether the most influential variables on family members’ loyalty remain the same as data for this study was collected from November 2019 to February 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Nadales Rodríguez & Guillermo Bermúdez-González & Ismael Pablo Soler-García, 2022. "Influence of the Corporate Image of Nursing Homes on the Loyalty of Residents’ Family Members," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9216-:d:873845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phoebus Dhrymes, 2017. "Introductory Econometrics," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-65916-9, December.
    2. Mert Gürlek & Ertugrul Düzgün & Selma Meydan Uygur, 2017. "How does corporate social responsibility create customer loyalty? The role of corporate image," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 409-427, August.
    3. Jae-Bin Cha & Mi-Na Jo, 2019. "The Effect of the Corporate Social Responsibility of Franchise Coffee Shops on Corporate Image and Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Pavitra Paul & Claudia Berlin & Maud Maessen & Hannu Valtonen, 2018. "A comparison of regret-based and utility-based discrete choice modelling – an empirical illustration with hospital bed choice," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(40), pages 4295-4305, August.
    5. Hausman, Jerry & McFadden, Daniel, 1984. "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(5), pages 1219-1240, September.
    6. Athanassopoulos, Antreas D., 2000. "Customer Satisfaction Cues To Support Market Segmentation and Explain Switching Behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 191-207, March.
    7. Ajimon George & Jobin Sahadevan, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework of Antecedents of Service Loyalty in Health Care: Patients’ Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 50-59, January.
    8. Christopher F Baum, 2006. "An Introduction to Modern Econometrics using Stata," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number imeus, March.
    9. Patricia Martínez García de Leaniz & Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque Rodríguez, 2016. "Corporate Image and Reputation as Drivers of Customer Loyalty," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 166-178, April.
    10. Cramer,J. S., 2011. "Logit Models from Economics and Other Fields," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521188036, September.
    11. Noémie Roy & Roxanne Dubé & Carole Després & Adriana Freitas & France Légaré, 2018. "Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-32, January.
    12. Mei-Ling Wang, 2015. "Linking service climate to customer loyalty," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7-8), pages 403-414, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertoli, Simone & Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús, 2013. "Multilateral resistance to migration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 79-100.
    2. María Dolores Aledo‐Ruiz & Eva Martínez‐Caro & José Manuel Santos‐Jaén, 2022. "The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 578-592, May.
    3. Grzenda Wioletta, 2021. "Modelling the occupational and educational choices of young people in Poland using Bayesian multinomial logit models," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 22(3), pages 175-191, September.
    4. Selahattin Guris & Nurcan Metin & Ebru Caglayan, 2007. "The Brand Choice Model of Wine Consumers: A Multinomial Logit Model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 447-460, June.
    5. Wioletta Grzenda, 2021. "Modelling the occupational and educational choices of young people in Poland using Bayesian multinomial logit models," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 175-191, September.
    6. Richard T. Carson & Derrick H. Sun & Yixiao Sun, 2024. "Random Utility Models with Skewed Random Components: the Smallest versus Largest Extreme Value Distribution," Papers 2405.08222, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    7. Risselada, Hans & Verhoef, Peter C. & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2010. "Staying Power of Churn Prediction Models," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 198-208.
    8. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Canavire-Bacarreza, Gustavo & Martínez-Vázquez, Jorge & Vulovic, Violeta, 2013. "Taxation and Economic Growth in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4583, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Reitz, Stefan & Rülke, Jan-Christoph & Stadtmann, Georg, 2012. "Nonlinear expectations in speculative markets – Evidence from the ECB survey of professional forecasters," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1349-1363.
    11. Lee, Boram & Rosenthal, Leonard & Veld, Chris & Veld-Merkoulova, Yulia, 2015. "Stock market expectations and risk aversion of individual investors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 122-131.
    12. Pereira, Pedro & Ribeiro, Tiago, 2011. "The impact on broadband access to the Internet of the dual ownership of telephone and cable networks," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 283-293, March.
    13. Gauri, Dinesh Kumar & Trivedi, Minakshi & Grewal, Dhruv, 2008. "Understanding the Determinants of Retail Strategy: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 256-267.
    14. T.R.L. Fry & R.D. Brooks & Br. Comley & J. Zhang, 1993. "Economic Motivations for Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variable Models," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 69(2), pages 193-205, June.
    15. Szabó, György & Borsos, István & Szombati, Edit, 2019. "Games, graphs and Kirchhoff laws," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 416-423.
    16. Bond, Craig A. & Thilmany, Dawn D. & Bond, Jennifer Keeling, 2008. "What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-26.
    17. Huy Quang Doan, 2019. "Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mungoma, Catherine, 2008. "The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 550-559, December.
    19. Qun Bao & Jiuli Huang & Yanling Wang, 2015. "Productivity and Firms’ Sales Destination: Chinese Characteristics," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 620-637, August.
    20. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9216-:d:873845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.