IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p5925-d814756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Affects Rural Ecological Environment Governance Efficiency? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Min Qian

    (School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Zhenpeng Cheng

    (Department of Global Food Service, Woosuk University, Jeonju 55338, Korea)

  • Zhengwen Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    National Institute of Insurance Development, Wuhan University, Ningbo 315100, China)

  • Dingyi Qi

    (The Hotchkiss School, Lakeville, CT 06039, USA)

Abstract

With rapid economic development, the protection of the ecological environment has become very important. The modernization of rural ecological governance is the basis and prerequisite for the sustainable economic and social development of vast rural areas of China in the current era. It is urgent to analyze the influencing factors and to improve China’s rural ecological environment governance efficiency for Rural Revitalization in the new era, and to promote the modernization of the national environmental governance system and governance capacity. This paper empirically examines the influencing factors on rural ecological environment governance efficiency in the whole country, and in the eastern, central and western regions separately, at the provincial level, using the Tobit regression model. The results show that, at the national scale, the level of rural economic development, the size of village committees and rural public participation all have positive roles in promoting the efficiency of rural ecological environment governance. Rural population agglomeration, financial support for agriculture. And environmental protection social organizations have negative roles, hindering the efficiency of rural ecological environment governance. From the perspective of the eastern, central, and western regions, the factors affecting the efficiency of rural ecological environment governance are different due to regional differences. According to the results of empirical analysis, it is proposed that the key issue in improving the efficiency of rural ecological environment governance in China is to promote differentiated regional coordinated governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Qian & Zhenpeng Cheng & Zhengwen Wang & Dingyi Qi, 2022. "What Affects Rural Ecological Environment Governance Efficiency? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5925-:d:814756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Xie & Qi Sun & Shaohong Wang & Xiaoping Li & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Environmental Regulation Affect Export Quality? Theory and Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Fei Fan & Dailin Cao & Ning Ma, 2020. "Is Improvement of Innovation Efficiency Conducive to Haze Governance? Empirical Evidence from 283 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Fei Fan & Shangze Dai & Keke Zhang & Haiqian Ke, 2021. "Innovation agglomeration and urban hierarchy: evidence from Chinese cities," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(54), pages 6300-6318, November.
    4. Gordon Akon-Yamga & Chux U. Daniels & Wilhemina Quaye & Blanche M. Ting & Adelaide A. Asante, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy approach to e-waste management in Ghana: Perspectives of actors on transformative changes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 387-397.
    5. Yuan-Chieh Chang & Po-Hsuan Chen & Min-Jun Teng, 2021. "Erratum to: How do institutional changes facilitate university-centric networks in Taiwan? The triple-helix model of innovation view," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 602-603.
    6. Reddy, V. Ratna & Behera, Bhagirath, 2006. "Impact of water pollution on rural communities: An economic analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 520-537, June.
    7. Guoxiang Li & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2021. "Construction land reduction, rural financial development, and industrial structure optimization," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1783-1803, September.
    8. Nasser Al‐Baimani & Nick Clifton & Eleri Jones & Rhiannon Pugh, 2021. "Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 663-686, June.
    9. Jian-qing Zhang & Tingting Chen & Fei Fan & Song Wang, 2018. "Empirical research on time-varying characteristics and efficiency of the Chinese economy and monetary policy: evidence from the MI-TVP-VAR model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(33), pages 3596-3613, July.
    10. Bekele, Wagayehu & Drake, Lars, 2003. "Soil and water conservation decision behavior of subsistence farmers in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: a case study of the Hunde-Lafto area," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 437-451, October.
    11. Markus M. Bugge & Fazilat Siddiq, 2021. "Empowering professionalism in mission-oriented innovation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 423-437.
    12. Fei Fan & Xuerong Zhang & Xueli Wang, 2022. "Are there political cycles hidden inside collaborative innovation efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 532-551.
    13. Shuai Liu & Fei Fan & Jianqing Zhang, 2019. "Are Small Cities More Environmentally Friendly? An Empirical Study from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Siliang Guo & Heng Ma, 2021. "Does industrial agglomeration promote high‐quality development of the Yellow River Basin in China? Empirical test from the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2040-2070, December.
    15. Balázs Borsi, 2021. "The Balanced State of Application-oriented Public Research and Technology Organisations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 612-629.
    16. Charles Ayoubi & Michele Pezzoni & Fabiana Visentin, 2021. "Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 635-648.
    17. Sowjanya Dhulipala & Gopal R. Patil, 2021. "Identification of freight generating industry complexes: A descriptive spatial analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2680-2712, December.
    18. Ernest Kay Bakpa & Hu Xuhua & Abigail Konadu Aboagye, 2021. "Ghana’s economic growth: Directing our focus on the contributing influences of innovation activities and trade," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2213-2237, December.
    19. Giuseppe Calignano, 2022. "Not all peripheries are the same: The importance of relative regional innovativeness in transnational innovation networks," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 276-312, March.
    20. Julie L. Hotchkiss & Anil Rupasingha, 2021. "Individual social capital and migration," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 808-837, June.
    21. Biranchi Narayan Adhikari & Ajay Kumar Behera & Rabindra Narayan Mahapatra & Harish Chandra Das, 2022. "Retracted: Effect of driving domain on driving attitude profiles in winter seasons of India," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 4-34, March.
    22. Elisa Cordeiro Bastos & Aline Rossales Sengik & Jorge Tello-Gamarra, 2021. "Fifty years of University-industry collaboration: a global bibliometrics overview," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 177-199.
    23. Michael Clormann, 2021. "Switching between worlds apart: Negotiating European space sector cultures through innovation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 521-530.
    24. Jianqing Zhang & Song Wang & Peilei Yang & Fei Fan & Xueli Wang, 2020. "Analysis of Scale Factors on China’s Sustainable Development Efficiency Based on Three-Stage DEA and a Double Threshold Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    25. Tommaso Agasisti & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "Cross-country analysis of higher education institutions’ efficiency: The role of strategic positioning," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(1), pages 66-79.
    26. Camilla Adelle & Tristan Görgens & Florian Kroll & Bruno Losch, 2021. "Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary communities of practice: Experiences from food governance in South Africa," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 145-153.
    27. Marcos Álvarez‐Díaz & Béatrice D’Hombres & Lewis Dijkstra & Claudia Ghisetti & Nicola Pontarollo, 2021. "Unveiling the local determinants of population growth in the European Union," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 150-166, March.
    28. Jia Gao & Ge Song & Shuhan Liu, 2022. "Factors influencing farmers’ willingness and behavior choices to withdraw from rural homesteads in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 112-131, March.
    29. Yuan-Chieh Chang & Po-Hsuan Chen & Min-Jun Teng, 2021. "How do institutional changes facilitate university-centric networks in Taiwan? The Triple Helix model of innovation view," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 309-324.
    30. Song Wang & Jiexin Wang & Chenqi Wei & Xueli Wang & Fei Fan, 2021. "Collaborative innovation efficiency: From within cities to between cities—Empirical analysis based on innovative cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1330-1360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifei Niu & Xi Wang & Ciyun Lin, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Organizing Environmental Awareness and Education on the Performance of Environmental Governance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Chenxi Li & Qiao Liu & Zhihong Zong & Yingying Fang, 2024. "Rural Environmental Quality Evaluation Indicator System: Application in Shangluo City, Shaanxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Luo Muchen & Rosita Hamdan & Rossazana Ab-Rahim, 2022. "Data-Driven Evaluation and Optimization of Agricultural Environmental Efficiency with Carbon Emission Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Binglu Wu & Di Mu & Yi Luo & Zhengguang Xiao & Jilong Zhao & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Ecological Problems in China from 2013 to 2022: A Review of Research Hotspots, Geographical Distribution, and Countermeasures," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Keming Huang & Fangzhou Xia, 2023. "Classification of Rural Relative Poverty Groups and Measurement of the Influence of Land Elements: A Questionnaire-Based Analysis of 23 Poor Counties in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Hu & Chengjin Ma & Chen Li, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Improve Regional Environmental Carrying Capacity? An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Liang Zhao & Lifei Xu & Ling Li & Jing Hu & Lin Mu, 2022. "Can Inbound Tourism Improve Regional Ecological Efficiency? An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Jianwei Zhang & Heng Li & Guoxin Jiao & Jiayi Wang & Jingjing Li & Mengzhen Li & Haining Jiang, 2022. "Spatial Pattern of Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Its Impact on Water Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Lili Yang & Ning Ma, 2022. "Empirical Study on the Influence of Urban Environmental Industrial Structure Optimization on Ecological Landscape Greening Construction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Jie Fan & Zhuo Shen & Zhengwen Wang, 2022. "The Threshold Effect of Urban Levels on Environmental Collaborative Governance: An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Ning Ma & Puyu Liu & Yadong Xiao & Hengyun Tang & Jianqing Zhang, 2022. "Can Green Technological Innovation Reduce Hazardous Air Pollutants?—An Empirical Test Based on 283 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Zuoming Liu & Changbo Qiu & Min Sun & Dongmin Zhang, 2022. "Environmental Performance Evaluation of Key Polluting Industries in China—Taking the Power Industry as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Jing Ma & Dan Liu & Zhengwen Wang, 2023. "Sponge City Construction and Urban Economic Sustainable Development: An Ecological Philosophical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Qianrui Hwang & Min Yao & Shugang Li & Fang Wang & Zhenmin Luo & Zheng Li & Tongshuang Liu, 2023. "Risk Spillovers between China’s Carbon and Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Chen Li & Heng Li & Xionghe Qin, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions and Its Influencing Factors in China: Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Wenyi Yang & Xueli Wang & Keke Zhang & Zikan Ke, 2020. "COVID-19, Urbanization Pattern and Economic Recovery: An Analysis of Hubei, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Haiqian Ke & Wenyi Yang & Xiaoyang Liu & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Jianqing Zhang & Haichao Yu & Keke Zhang & Liang Zhao & Fei Fan, 2021. "Can Innovation Agglomeration Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Liang Zhao & Liangyu Chen, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Government Environmental Information Disclosure on Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Experience from Chinese Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Mingxia Liu & Wei Jiang, 2022. "Empirical Research on the Influence Mechanisms of Digital Resources Input on Service Innovation in China’s Finance Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Yunling Ye & Sheng Ye & Haichao Yu, 2021. "Can Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration Reduce Haze Pollution? City-Level Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Chen Li & Le Zhang & Qinyi Gu & Jia Guo & Yi Huang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Urbanization Factors of Urban Household Carbon Emissions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Haiqian Ke & Bo Yang & Shangze Dai, 2022. "Does Intensive Land Use Contribute to Energy Efficiency?—Evidence Based on a Spatial Durbin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Yiping Sun & Xiangyi Li & Tengyuan Zhang & Jiawei Fu, 2022. "Does Trade Policy Uncertainty Exacerbate Environmental Pollution?—Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Le Zhang & Qinyi Gu & Chen Li & Yi Huang, 2022. "Characteristics and Spatial–Temporal Differences of Urban “Production, Living and Ecological” Environmental Quality in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5925-:d:814756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.