IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p5802-d812202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of South African Hypertension: Application of Panel Quantile Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Anesu Gelfand Kuhudzai

    (Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
    Statistical Consultation Services, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Guido Van Hal

    (Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Stefan Van Dongen

    (Department of Evolutionary Ecology and Biology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Muhammad Ehsanul Hoque

    (Research Department, Management College of Southern Africa, Durban 4001, South Africa)

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the crucial risk factors for morbidity and mortality around the world, and South Africa has a significant unmet need for hypertension care. This study aims to establish the potential risk factors of hypertension amongst adults in South Africa attributable to high systolic and diastolic blood pressure over time by fitting panel quantile regression models. Data obtained from the South African National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) Household Surveys carried out from 2008 to 2018 (Wave 1 to Wave 5) was employed to develop both the fixed effects and random effects panel quantile regression models. Age, BMI, gender (males), race, exercises, cigarette consumption, and employment status were significantly associated with either one of the BP measures across all the upper quantiles or at the 75th quantile only. Suggesting that these risk factors have contributed to the exacerbation of uncontrolled hypertension prevalence over time in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Anesu Gelfand Kuhudzai & Guido Van Hal & Stefan Van Dongen & Muhammad Ehsanul Hoque, 2022. "Modelling of South African Hypertension: Application of Panel Quantile Regression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5802-:d:812202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/5802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Bache & Christian Dahl & Johannes Kristensen, 2013. "Headlights on tobacco road to low birthweight outcomes," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1593-1633, June.
    2. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    3. Erika L Moen & Catherine J Fricano-Kugler & Bryan W Luikart & A James O’Malley, 2016. "Analyzing Clustered Data: Why and How to Account for Multiple Observations Nested within a Study Participant?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Maria Marino & Alessio Farcomeni, 2015. "Linear quantile regression models for longitudinal experiments: an overview," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 229-247, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geraci, Marco, 2019. "Modelling and estimation of nonlinear quantile regression with clustered data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-46.
    2. Chin-Hsien Yu & Bruce A. McCarl, 2018. "The Water Implications of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Effects on Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2021. "Bayesian panel quantile regression for binary outcomes with correlated random effects: an application on crime recidivism in Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 227-259, January.
    4. Priya Kedia & Damitri Kundu & Kiranmoy Das, 2023. "A Bayesian variable selection approach to longitudinal quantile regression," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 149-168, March.
    5. Xavier Vollenweider, 2014. "A simple framework for the estimation of climate exposure," GRI Working Papers 158, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    6. Marco Alfò & Maria Francesca Marino & Maria Giovanna Ranalli & Nicola Salvati & Nikos Tzavidis, 2021. "M‐quantile regression for multivariate longitudinal data with an application to the Millennium Cohort Study," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 122-146, January.
    7. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2015. "Convergence: A Story of Quantiles and Spillovers," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 552-576, November.
    8. Francesco Schirripa Spagnolo & Nicola Salvati & Antonella D’Agostino & Ides Nicaise, 2020. "The use of sampling weights in M‐quantile random‐effects regression: an application to Programme for International Student Assessment mathematics scores," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 991-1012, August.
    9. Petrella, Lea & Raponi, Valentina, 2019. "Joint estimation of conditional quantiles in multivariate linear regression models with an application to financial distress," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 70-84.
    10. Sinem Koçak & Özge Barış-Tüzemen, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 on foreign direct investment inflows in emerging economies: evidence from panel quantile regression," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Tilov, Ivan & Farsi, Mehdi & Volland, Benjamin, 2020. "From frugal Jane to wasteful John: A quantile regression analysis of Swiss households’ electricity demand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Pourya Valizadeh & Shu Wen Ng, 2021. "Would A National Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Tax in the United States Be Well Targeted?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 961-986, May.
    13. Christian M. Dahl & Daniel le Maire & Jakob R. Munch, 2013. "Wage Dispersion and Decentralization of Wage Bargaining," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(3), pages 501-533.
    14. Mateut, Simona & Chevapatrakul, Thanaset, 2018. "Customer financing, bargaining power and trade credit uptake," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 147-162.
    15. Siamak Ghasemzadeh & Mojtaba Ganjali & Taban Baghfalaki, 2018. "Bayesian quantile regression for analyzing ordinal longitudinal responses in the presence of non-ignorable missingness," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 76(3), pages 321-348, December.
    16. Raffaele Miniaci & Paolo Panteghini, 2021. "On the Capital Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries: Evidence from a Panel Data Quantile Regression Model," CESifo Working Paper Series 9085, CESifo.
    17. Gomez-Gonzalez, Jose E. & Uribe, Jorge M. & Valencia, Oscar, 2024. "Asymmetric Sovereign Risk: Implications for Climate Change Preparation," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13447, Inter-American Development Bank.
    18. Dariusz Wójcik & Eric Knight & Vladimír Pažitka, 2018. "What turns cities into international financial centres? Analysis of cross-border investment banking 2000–2014," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 1-33.
    19. Fulvio Castellacci & Bart Los & Gaaitzen Vries, 2014. "Sectoral productivity trends: convergence islands in oceans of non-convergence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 983-1007, November.
    20. Haddou, Samira, 2024. "Determinants of CDS in core and peripheral European countries: A comparative study during crisis and calm periods," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:5802-:d:812202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.