IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p177-d710503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Clinical Prediction Rules for One-Year Postoperative Functional Outcome in Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures: The Intertrochanteric Fracture Ambulatory Prediction (IT-AP) Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Nath Adulkasem

    (Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand)

  • Phichayut Phinyo

    (Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR) Cluster, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Jiraporn Khorana

    (Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Dumnoensun Pruksakorn

    (Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR) Cluster, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Theerachai Apivatthakakul

    (Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

Individualized prediction of postoperative ambulatory status for patients with intertrochanteric fractures is clinically relevant, during both preoperative and intraoperative periods. This study intended to develop clinical prediction rules (CPR) to predict one-year postoperative functional outcomes in patients with intertrochanteric fractures. CPR development was based on a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients with intertrochanteric fractures aged ≥50 years who underwent a surgical fixation. Good ambulatory status was defined as a New Mobility Score ≥ 5. Two CPR for preoperative and intraoperative predictions were derived using clinical profiles and surgical-related parameters using logistic regression with the multivariable fractional polynomial procedure. In this study, 221 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were included. Of these, 160 (72.4%) had good functional status at one year. The preoperative model showed an acceptable AuROC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85). After surgical-related parameters were incorporated into the preoperative model, the model discriminative ability was significantly improved to an AuROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.88) ( p = 0.021). The newly-derived CPR enable physicians to provide patients with intertrochanteric fractures with their individualized predictions of functional outcome one year after surgery, which could be used for risk communication, surgical optimization and tailoring postoperative care that fits patients’ expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nath Adulkasem & Phichayut Phinyo & Jiraporn Khorana & Dumnoensun Pruksakorn & Theerachai Apivatthakakul, 2021. "Development of Clinical Prediction Rules for One-Year Postoperative Functional Outcome in Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures: The Intertrochanteric Fracture Ambulatory Prediction (IT-AP) Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:177-:d:710503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewout W Steyerberg & Karel G M Moons & Danielle A van der Windt & Jill A Hayden & Pablo Perel & Sara Schroter & Richard D Riley & Harry Hemingway & Douglas G Altman & for the PROGRESS Group, 2013. "Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Nath Adulkasem & Phichayut Phinyo & Jiraporn Khorana & Dumnoensun Pruksakorn & Theerachai Apivatthakakul, 2021. "Prognostic Factors of 1-Year Postoperative Functional Outcomes of Older Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures in Thailand: A Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Richard D Riley & Jill A Hayden & Ewout W Steyerberg & Karel G M Moons & Keith Abrams & Panayiotis A Kyzas & Núria Malats & Andrew Briggs & Sara Schroter & Douglas G Altman & Harry Hemingway & for the, 2013. "Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julius Sim & Lucy Teece & Martin S Dennis & Christine Roffe & SOࠢS Study Team, 2016. "Validation and Recalibration of Two Multivariable Prognostic Models for Survival and Independence in Acute Stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Mario Dioguardi & Francesca Spirito & Diego Sovereto & Mario Alovisi & Giuseppe Troiano & Riccardo Aiuto & Daniele Garcovich & Vito Crincoli & Luigi Laino & Angela Pia Cazzolla & Giorgia Apollonia Cal, 2022. "MicroRNA-21 Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oral Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Catherine Beauregard-Paultre & Claire Nour Abou Chakra & Allison McGeer & Annie-Claude Labbé & Andrew E Simor & Wayne Gold & Matthew P Muller & Jeff Powis & Kevin Katz & Suzanne M Cadarette & Jacques , 2019. "External validation of clinical prediction rules for complications and mortality following Clostridioides difficile infection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Stephana J Cherak & Andrea Soo & Kyla N Brown & E Wesley Ely & Henry T Stelfox & Kirsten M Fiest, 2020. "Development and validation of delirium prediction model for critically ill adults parameterized to ICU admission acuity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. François Luthi & Olivier Deriaz & Philippe Vuistiner & Cyrille Burrus & Roger Hilfiker, 2014. "Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Daan Nieboer & Tjeerd van der Ploeg & Ewout W Steyerberg, 2016. "Assessing Discriminative Performance at External Validation of Clinical Prediction Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Alwin Schierenberg & Margaretha C Minnaard & Rogier M Hopstaken & Alma C van de Pol & Berna D L Broekhuizen & Niek J de Wit & Johannes B Reitsma & Saskia F van Vugt & Aleida W Graffelman & Hasse Melby, 2016. "External Validation of Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Primary Care Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Phung Khanh Lam & Dong Thi Hoai Tam & Nguyen Minh Dung & Nguyen Thi Hanh Tien & Nguyen Tan Thanh Kieu & Cameron Simmons & Jeremy Farrar & Bridget Wills & Marcel Wolbers, 2015. "A Prognostic Model for Development of Profound Shock among Children Presenting with Dengue Shock Syndrome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Andrew D A C Smith & Kate Tilling & Debbie A Lawlor & Scott M Nelson, 2015. "External Validation and Calibration of IVFpredict: A National Prospective Cohort Study of 130,960 In Vitro Fertilisation Cycles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Igor O Korolev & Laura L Symonds & Andrea C Bozoki & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2016. "Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Dementia Using Clinical, MRI, and Plasma Biomarkers via Probabilistic Pattern Classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Jia You & Yu Guo & Yi Zhang & Ju-Jiao Kang & Lin-Bo Wang & Jian-Feng Feng & Wei Cheng & Jin-Tai Yu, 2023. "Plasma proteomic profiles predict individual future health risk," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Jakob Steinfeldt & Benjamin Wild & Thore Buergel & Maik Pietzner & Julius Upmeier zu Belzen & Andre Vauvelle & Stefan Hegselmann & Spiros Denaxas & Harry Hemingway & Claudia Langenberg & Ulf Landmesse, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Medical history predicts phenome-wide disease onset and enables the rapid response to emerging health threats," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Todd J. Levy & Kevin Coppa & Jinxuan Cang & Douglas P. Barnaby & Marc D. Paradis & Stuart L. Cohen & Alex Makhnevich & David Klaveren & David M. Kent & Karina W. Davidson & Jamie S. Hirsch & Theodoros, 2022. "Development and validation of self-monitoring auto-updating prognostic models of survival for hospitalized COVID-19 patients," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Jiakun Jiang & Wei Yang & Erin M. Schnellinger & Stephen E. Kimmel & Wensheng Guo, 2023. "Dynamic logistic state space prediction model for clinical decision making," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 73-85, March.
    15. Zhixuan Fu & Chirag R. Parikh & Bingqing Zhou, 2017. "Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 353-376, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:177-:d:710503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.