IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1755-d497742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Telehealth Use in Geriatrics Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Scoping Review and Evidence Synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy

    (Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar)

  • Anupama Jithesh

    (Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar)

  • Ravinder Mamtani

    (Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar)

  • Amit Abraham

    (Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar)

  • Sohaila Cheema

    (Institute for Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, P.O. Box 24144, Doha, Qatar)

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected older people disproportionately. Prior to the pandemic, some studies reported that telehealth was an efficient and effective form of health care delivery, particularly for older people. There has been increased use of telehealth and publication of new literature on this topic during the pandemic, so we conducted a scoping review and evidence synthesis for telehealth use in geriatric care to summarize learning from these new data. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 global research database for articles published between 1 January and 20 August 2020. We included 79 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The information collected has been synthesized and presented as descriptive statistics. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) have also been discussed. Results: The articles included in our review provide some evidence of effective provision of preventive, curative, and rehabilitative telehealth services for older people, but they highlight a greater focus on curative services and are mostly concentrated in high-income countries. We identified convenience and affordability as the strengths of telehealth use in geriatric care. Weaknesses identified include the inability of telehealth to cater to the needs of older people with specific physical and cognitive limitations. While the threats of increasing inequity and the lack of standardization in the provision of age-friendly telehealth services remain, we identified opportunities for technologic advancements driven by simplicity and user-friendliness for older people. Conclusion: Telehealth offers futuristic promise for the provision of essential health care services for older people worldwide. However, the extent of these services via telehealth appears to be currently limited in low and low-middle income countries. Optimizing telehealth services that can be accessed by older people requires greater government investments and active engagement by broader participation of older people, their caregivers, physicians and other health care providers, technology experts, and health managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy & Anupama Jithesh & Ravinder Mamtani & Amit Abraham & Sohaila Cheema, 2021. "Telehealth Use in Geriatrics Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Scoping Review and Evidence Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1755-:d:497742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Palayew & Ole Norgaard & Kelly Safreed-Harmon & Tue Helms Andersen & Lauge Neimann Rasmussen & Jeffrey V. Lazarus, 2020. "Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 666-669, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ceci Diehl & Rita Tavares & Taiane Abreu & Ana Margarida Pisco Almeida & Telmo Eduardo Silva & Gonçalo Santinha & Nelson Pacheco Rocha & Katja Seidel & Mac MacLachlan & Anabela G. Silva & Oscar Ribeir, 2022. "Perceptions on Extending the Use of Technology after the COVID-19 Pandemic Resolves: A Qualitative Study with Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Emily Jezewski & Abigale Miller & MaryAnn Eusebio & Jane Potter, 2022. "Targeted Telehealth Education Increases Interest in Using Telehealth among a Diverse Group of Low-Income Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-9, October.
    3. Lorenzo Lippi & Francesco D’Abrosca & Arianna Folli & Alberto Dal Molin & Stefano Moalli & Antonio Maconi & Antonio Ammendolia & Alessandro de Sire & Marco Invernizzi, 2022. "Closing the Gap between Inpatient and Outpatient Settings: Integrating Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Technological Advances in the Comprehensive Management of Frail Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Clément Cormi & Jan Chrusciel & Antoine Fayol & Michel Van Rechem & Khuloud Abou-Amsha & Matthieu Tixier & Myriam Lewkowicz & David Laplanche & Stéphane Sanchez, 2021. "The Use of Telemedicine in Nursing Homes: A Mixed-Method Study to Identify Critical Factors When Connecting with a General Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Susan Ostertag & Jade Bosic-Reiniger & Chris Migliaccio & Rachael Zins, 2022. "Promoting Older Adult Health with Interprofessional Education through Community Based Health Screening," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Ning Lu & Yefei Li & Bochu Xu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Smart Health Products for Aging Based on the IIVAHP-CRITIC Model: A Case Study of Smart Health Kiosk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Cabanac & Theodora Oikonomidi & Isabelle Boutron, 2021. "Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5285-5304, June.
    2. Anna Walaszczyk & Małgorzata Koszewska & Iwona Staniec, 2022. "Food Traceability as an Element of Sustainable Consumption—Pandemic-Driven Changes in Consumer Attitudes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Flaminio Squazzoni & Giangiacomo Bravo & Francisco Grimaldo & Daniel García-Costa & Mike Farjam & Bahar Mehmani, 2021. "Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Angelo Capodici & Aurelia Salussolia & Francesco Sanmarchi & Davide Gori & Davide Golinelli, 2023. "Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4881-4913, October.
    5. E. Sachini & K. Sioumalas-Christodoulou & C. Chrysomallidis & G. Siganos & N. Bouras & N. Karampekios, 2021. "COVID-19 enabled co-authoring networks: a country-case analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5225-5244, June.
    6. Török, Ádám & Konka, Boglárka & Nagy, Andrea Magda, 2023. "A koronavírus-járvány a közgazdasági szakirodalomban. Egy új határterület tudománymetriai elemzése [The coronavirus pandemic in the economics literature. The scientometric analysis of a new discipl," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 284-304.
    7. Lucas Rodriguez Forti & Luiz A. Solino & Judit K. Szabo, 2021. "Trade-off between urgency and reduced editorial capacity affect publication speed in ecological and medical journals during 2020," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Guillaume Cabanac & Ingo Frommholz & Philipp Mayr, 2020. "Scholarly literature mining with information retrieval and natural language processing: Preface," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2835-2840, December.
    9. , Aisdl, 2020. "Let’s Do Better: Public Representations of COVID-19 Science," OSF Preprints 3cpvs, Center for Open Science.
    10. Jian Gao & Yian Yin & Kyle R. Myers & Karim R. Lakhani & Dashun Wang, 2021. "Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, December.
    11. Trenton Taros & Christopher Zoppo & Nathan Yee & Jack Hanna & Christine MacGinnis, 2023. "Retracted Covid-19 articles: significantly more cited than other articles within their journal of origin," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2935-2943, May.
    12. Rebecca A. Krukowski & Loneke T. Blackman Carr & Danielle Arigo, 2022. "Pandemic-Related Tenure Timeline Extensions in Higher Education in the United States: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Turgut Karakose & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Murat Demirkol & Hakan Polat, 2021. "Science Mapping of the Global Knowledge Base on Management, Leadership, and Administration Related to COVID-19 for Promoting the Sustainability of Scientific Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Gabriela F. Nane & Nicolas Robinson-Garcia & François Schalkwyk & Daniel Torres-Salinas, 2023. "COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 345-362, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1755-:d:497742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.