IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p679-d480538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Tradable Water Volumes of Industry in Water-Rich Areas of China: A Case Study of Changsha City

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang-nan Chen

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Planning and Decision-Making, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Feng-ping Wu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Planning and Decision-Making, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Fang Li

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Planning and Decision-Making, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yue Zhao

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Planning and Decision-Making, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xia Xu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Planning and Decision-Making, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

Tradable water volumes is one of the basic elements of water-rights trading. In China, water-rights transactions mostly occur in water-deficient areas. However, the water-rich areas are also facing serious water-shortage problems. It is necessary to stimulate the water-rights trading power in abundant water areas to improve water-resource predicament. This paper studied the concept and calculation method of tradable water volumes of industry. First, based on the property rights theory, we analyzed the concept of tradable water volumes, and put forward the preliminary determination of water-rights trading subjects. Then, we defined the tradable water volumes of industry as the difference between the initial water-rights allocation and the water demand of industry. We used the proportion method to calculate the initial water-rights allocation of industry under different runoff frequencies, and grey model (1,1) to predict the water demand of industry. Finally, we applied the calculation method to Changsha city which is in a water-rich area of China. The calculation results contribute to water-resource management in Changsha city. This paper will provide a theoretical basis for researching the tradable water volumes, and promote the development of water-rights trading in China’s water-rich areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang-nan Chen & Feng-ping Wu & Fang Li & Yue Zhao & Xia Xu, 2021. "Analysis of Tradable Water Volumes of Industry in Water-Rich Areas of China: A Case Study of Changsha City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:679-:d:480538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Quentin Grafton & Clay Landry & Gary D. Libecap & Sam McGlennon & Bob O’Brien, 2010. "An Integrated Assessment of Water Markets: Australia, Chile, China, South Africa and the USA," ICER Working Papers 32-2010, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    2. Lina Zhang & Xiaoling Zhang & Fengping Wu & Qinghua Pang, 2020. "Basin Initial Water Rights Allocation under Multiple Uncertainties: a Trade-off Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 955-988, February.
    3. Howitt, Richard E., 1994. "Empirical analysis of water market institutions: The 1991 California water market," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 357-371, November.
    4. Sarah Ann Wheeler & Dustin E Garrick, 2020. "A tale of two water markets in Australia: lessons for understanding participation in formal water markets," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 132-153.
    5. Anahí Urquiza & Marco Billi, 2020. "Water markets and social–ecological resilience to water stress in the context of climate change: an analysis of the Limarí Basin, Chile," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1929-1951, March.
    6. David Lewis & Hang Zheng, 2019. "How could water markets like Australia’s work in China?," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 638-658, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xiang-nan & Wu, Feng-ping & Li, Fang & Zhao, Yue & Xu, Xia, 2022. "Prediction and analysis of water rights trading volume: Based on the water rights trading in Inner Mongolia, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Wu, Zheng & Tian, Guiliang & Xia, Qing & Hu, Hao & Li, Jiawen, 2023. "Connotation, calculation and influencing factors of the water-use rights benchmark price: A case study of agricultural water use in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Chen, Xiang-nan & Li, Fang & Wu, Feng-ping & Xu, Xia & Zhao, Yue, 2023. "Initial water rights allocation of Industry in the Yellow River basin driven by high-quality development," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:ubzefd:148054 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bajaj, Akshi & Singh, S.P. & Nayak, Diptimayee, 2022. "Impact of water markets on equity and efficiency in irrigation water use: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Duan, Yeqing & Zhou, Shenbei & He, Jiangping & Bai, Minghao, 2024. "Improving the performance of agricultural temporary water markets: The role of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    4. Xin Xuan & Bing Liu & Fan Zhang, 2021. "Climate Change and Adaptive Management: Case Study in Agriculture, Forestry and Pastoral Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Hansen, Kristiana, 2010. "Water Markets and Water Rights Markets in the Western United States," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10.
    6. Skurray, James H., 2015. "The scope for collective action in a large groundwater basin: An institutional analysis of aquifer governance in Western Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 128-140.
    7. Hartwig, Lana D. & Jackson, Sue & Osborne, Natalie, 2020. "Trends in Aboriginal water ownership in New South Wales, Australia: The continuities between colonial and neoliberal forms of dispossession," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Ellen Hanak, 2005. "Stopping the Drain: Third‐party Responses to California's Water Market," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(1), pages 59-77, January.
    9. Hansen, Kristiana & Howitt, Richard E. & Williams, Jeffrey C., 2006. "Implementing Options Markets in California To Manage Water Supply Uncertainty," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21218, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2022. "Debunking Murray‐Darling Basin water trade myths," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(4), pages 797-821, October.
    11. Williamson, Brendon & Villano, Renato A. & Fleming, Euan M., 2008. "Structuring Exotic Options Contracts on Water to Improve the Efficiency of Resource Allocation in the Water Spot Market," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 5992, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Ellen M. Bruno & Richard J. Sexton, 2020. "The Gains from Agricultural Groundwater Trade and the Potential for Market Power: Theory and Application," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 884-910, May.
    13. Johannus Janmaat, 2011. "Water Markets, Licenses, and Conservation: Some Implications," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(1), pages 145-159.
    14. Joachim von Braun, 2016. "Policy Nook: “Expanding Water Modeling to Serve Real Policy Needs”," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Hanak, Ellen, 2003. "Stopping The Drain: Third-Party Resistance To Water Marketing In California," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22099, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Chen, Xiang-nan & Li, Fang & Wu, Feng-ping & Xu, Xia & Zhao, Yue, 2023. "Initial water rights allocation of Industry in the Yellow River basin driven by high-quality development," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    17. Li Zhang & Shao Jia & Chi Leung & Li Guo, 2013. "An Analysis on the Transaction Costs of Water Markets under DPA and UPA Auctions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 475-484, January.
    18. Kym Anderson, 2022. "Structural transformation in growing open economies: Australia’s experience," Departmental Working Papers 2022-13, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    19. Skurray, James H. & Roberts, E.J. & Pannell, David J., 2013. "Hydrological challenges to groundwater trading: lessons from south-west Western Australia," Working Papers 161073, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. Chaudhry, Anita M. & Fairbanks, Dean H.K. & Caldwell, Alyssa, 2015. "Determinants of Water Sales During Droughts: Evidence from Rice Farm-Level Data in California," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205446, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Zhang, Chunmei & Zhao, Yuanfeng & Xiu, Changbai, 2020. "Does Water Rights Trading Promote Economic Efficiency of Water Resource? : A global literature review," Conference papers 333128, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:679-:d:480538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.