IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13362-d705864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment on Suicide Death and Attempt among Chinese Rural Youths Aged 15–34 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Long Sun

    (Center for Suicide Prevention Research, School of Public Health, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China
    Key Laboratory for Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), National Health Commission of China, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China)

  • Jie Zhang

    (Center for Suicide Prevention Research, School of Public Health, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China
    Department of Sociology, Central University of Finance and Economics, 39 Xueyuannan Road, Beijing 100081, China
    Department of Sociology, State University of New York Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14222, USA)

  • Dorian A. Lamis

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 10 Park Place, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Yifan Wang

    (Center for Suicide Prevention Research, School of Public Health, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China
    Key Laboratory for Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), National Health Commission of China, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China)

Abstract

Background: Although many suicide risk assessment tools are available in the world, their validity is not adequately assessed. In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate a suicide risk assessment model among Chinese rural youths aged 15–34 years. Method: Subjects were 373 suicide deaths and 507 suicide attempters aged 15–34 years in three Chinese provinces (Shandong, Liaoning, and Hunan). Information about the community residents was also collected as the control groups. Social-demographic, social and psychological variables were examined for the suicides, suicide attempters, and community residents. Logistic regressions based on subjects from Shandong and Liaoning provinces were conducted to establish the suicide risk assessment models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn, and area under the ROC curves (AUC) were calculated to show how well the models separated the group being tested into those with and without suicide attempt or suicide. Results: The assessment model for suicide death included education years (OR = 0.773, p < 0.001), agricultural worker (OR = 2.091, p < 0.05), physical health (OR = 0.445, p < 0.05), family suicide history (OR = 6.858, p < 0.001), negative life events (OR = 1.340, p < 0.001), hopelessness (OR = 1.171, p < 0.001), impulsivity (OR = 1.151, p < 0.001), and mental disorder (OR = 8.384, p < 0.001). All these factors were also supported in the assessment model for suicide attempt, with an extension of very poor economic status (OR = 1.941, p < 0.01) and social interaction (OR = 0.855, p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.950 and 0.857 for the sample used to establish the assessment models of suicide death and attempt, respectively. The AUC was 0.967 and 0.942 for the sample used to verify the established assessment models of suicide death and attempt, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with some other assessment tools, the models for suicide death and attempt in the current study performed well among Chinese rural youths aged 15–34 years. A reliable suicide risk assessment approach, which includes multiple risk factors, should be evaluated in various cultures and populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Long Sun & Jie Zhang & Dorian A. Lamis & Yifan Wang, 2021. "Risk Assessment on Suicide Death and Attempt among Chinese Rural Youths Aged 15–34 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13362-:d:705864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bolton, J.M. & Robinson, J., 2010. "Population-attributable fractions of Axis i and Axis II mental disorders for suicide attempts: Findings from a representative sample of the adult, noninstitutionalized US population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(12), pages 2473-2480.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillermo Gómez Delgado & Antonio Ponce Rojo & Jaime Eduardo Ramírez Mireles & Felipe de Jesús Carmona-Moreno & Claudia Cecilia Flores Salcedo & Aurea Mercedes Hernández Romero, 2024. "Suicide Risk Factors in High School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-25, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Caulkins, 2019. "Detection of Psychological Trauma and Suicide Risk among Emergency Medical Services Personnel- An Artificial Intelligence Approach," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 23(3), pages 17372-17376, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13362-:d:705864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.