IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13297-d704513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using GIS to Estimate Population at Risk Because of Residence Proximity to Asbestos Processing Facilities in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Lysaniuk

    (IRD (MàD by CNRS)—UMR Prodig, 93222 Aubervilliers, France)

  • María Fernanda Cely-García

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Margarita Giraldo

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Joan M. Larrahondo

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Laura Marcela Serrano-Calderón

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Juan Carlos Guerrero-Bernal

    (Facultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanos (FEIPU), Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Leonardo Briceno-Ayala

    (Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Esteban Cruz Rodriguez

    (Facultad de Estudios Internacionales, Políticos y Urbanos (FEIPU), Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

Abstract

The recent enactment of the law banning asbestos in Colombia raises a significant number of challenges. The largest factories that have historically processed asbestos include five asbestos-cement facilities located in the cities of Sibaté (Cundinamarca), Cali (Valle del Cauca), and Barranquilla (Atlántico), and Manizales (Caldas), which has two, as well as a friction products facility in Bogotá D.C. An asbestos chrysotile mine has also operated in Colombia since 1980 in Campamento (Antioquia). In the framework of developing the National Asbestos Profile for Colombia, in this study, we estimated the population residing in the vicinity of asbestos processing plants or the mine and, therefore, potentially at risk of disease. Using a geographic information system, demographic data obtained from the last two general population censuses were processed to determine the number of people living within the concentric circles surrounding the asbestos facilities and the mine. In previous studies conducted in different countries of the world, an increased risk of asbestos-related diseases has been reported for people living at different distance bands from asbestos processing facilities. Based on these studies, circles of 500, 1000, 2000, 5000, and 10,000 m radii, centered on the asbestos processing facilities and the mine that operated in Colombia, were combined with the census data to estimate the number of people living within these radii. Large numbers of people were identified. It is estimated that in 2005, at the country level, 10,489 people lived within 500 m of an asbestos processing facility or mine. In 2018, and within a distance of 10,000 m, the number of people was 6,724,677. This information can aid public health surveillance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Lysaniuk & María Fernanda Cely-García & Margarita Giraldo & Joan M. Larrahondo & Laura Marcela Serrano-Calderón & Juan Carlos Guerrero-Bernal & Leonardo Briceno-Ayala & Esteban Cruz Rodriguez, 2021. "Using GIS to Estimate Population at Risk Because of Residence Proximity to Asbestos Processing Facilities in Colombia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13297-:d:704513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniela Marsili & Benedetto Terracini & Vilma S. Santana & Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla & Roberto Pasetto & Agata Mazzeo & Dana Loomis & Pietro Comba & Eduardo Algranti, 2016. "Prevention of Asbestos-Related Disease in Countries Currently Using Asbestos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Dongmug Kang & Yongsik Hwang & Yeyong Choi & Se-Yeong Kim & Young-Ki Kim, 2018. "Monitoring and Simulating Environmental Asbestos Dispersion from a Textile Factory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Luigi Vimercati & Domenica Cavone & Maria Celeste Delfino & Antonio Caputi & Luigi De Maria & Stefania Sponselli & Vincenzo Corrado & Giovanni Maria Ferri & Gabriella Serio, 2020. "Asbestos Air Pollution: Description of a Mesothelioma Cluster Due to Residential Exposure from an Asbestos Cement Factory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Braun, L. & Kisting, S., 2006. "Asbestos-related disease in South Africa: The social production of an invisible epidemic," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(8), pages 1386-1396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kathleen Mahoney & Tim Driscoll & Julia Collins & Justine Ross, 2023. "The Past, Present and Future of Asbestos-Related Diseases in Australia: What Are the Data Telling Us?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathleen Mahoney & Tim Driscoll & Julia Collins & Justine Ross, 2023. "The Past, Present and Future of Asbestos-Related Diseases in Australia: What Are the Data Telling Us?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Joanne Vincenten & Frank George & Marco Martuzzi & Peter Schröder-Bäck & Elizabet Paunovic, 2017. "Barriers and Facilitators to the Elimination of Asbestos Related Diseases—Stakeholders’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-9, October.
    3. Dongmug Kang & Seung Ho Lee & Yoon Ji Kim & Tae Kyoung Kim & Ju Young Kim & Youngki Kim, 2021. "Development of Nationwide Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk Evaluation Methods with Comprehensive Past Asbestos Exposure Reconstruction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Anna Suraya & Dennis Nowak & Astrid Widajati Sulistomo & Aziza Ghanie Icksan & Elisna Syahruddin & Ursula Berger & Stephan Bose-O’Reilly, 2020. "Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Lucia Fazzo & Giada Minelli & Marco De Santis & Emiliano Ceccarelli & Ivano Iavarone & Amerigo Zona, 2023. "The Epidemiological Surveillance of Mesothelioma Mortality in Italy as a Tool for the Prevention of Asbestos Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Nelson Gouveia, 2016. "Addressing Environmental Health Inequalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-3, August.
    7. Daniela Marsili & Alessia Angelini & Caterina Bruno & Marisa Corfiati & Alessandro Marinaccio & Stefano Silvestri & Amerigo Zona & Pietro Comba, 2017. "Asbestos Ban in Italy: A Major Milestone, Not the Final Cut," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Kapo Wong & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2018. "Emerging Issues in Occupational Safety and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-4, December.
    9. Trudie Vorster & Julian Mthombeni & Jim teWaterNaude & James Ian Phillips, 2022. "The Association between the Histological Subtypes of Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, November.
    10. Ramos-Toro, Diego, 2017. "Social Cohesion and Carbon Emissions," MPRA Paper 82396, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Selma Metintaş & Hasan Fevzi Batırel & Hasan Bayram & Ülkü Yılmaz & Mehmet Karadağ & Güntülü Ak & Muzaffer Metintaş, 2017. "Turkey National Mesothelioma Surveillance and Environmental Asbestos Exposure Control Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Chunhui Chen & Zesen Peng & JiaYu Gu & Yaxiong Peng & Xiaoyang Huang & Li Wu, 2020. "Exploring Environmentally Friendly Biopolymer Material Effect on Soil Tensile and Compressive Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Corrado Magnani & Carolina Mensi & Alessandra Binazzi & Daniela Marsili & Federica Grosso & Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla & Daniela Ferrante & Enrica Migliore & Dario Mirabelli & Benedetto Terracini & Dari, 2023. "The Italian Experience in the Development of Mesothelioma Registries: A Pathway for Other Countries to Address the Negative Legacy of Asbestos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Sofie Bünemann Dalsgaard & Else Toft Würtz & Johnni Hansen & Oluf Dimitri Røe & Øyvind Omland, 2021. "Cancer Incidence and Risk of Multiple Cancers after Environmental Asbestos Exposure in Childhood—A Long-Term Register-Based Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13297-:d:704513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.