IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13008-d698754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First Systematic Review on Health Communication Using the CiteSpace Software in China: Exploring Its Research Hotspots and Frontiers

Author

Listed:
  • Qiong Dang

    (Climate and Health Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Communication, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Zhongming Luo

    (Climate and Health Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Communication, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Chuhao Ouyang

    (Climate and Health Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Communication, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Lin Wang

    (Climate and Health Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Communication, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

Since the 1970s, health communication (HC) has attracted widespread attention from practitioners and researchers in various fields in China, leading to the production of a vast array of literature. In order to reveal the current state, popular themes, and research frontiers of HC research, this study employed the CiteSpace software to conduct a comprehensive review based on 1505 HC publications from 1992 to 2021 retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. The results demonstrated that (1) the number of HC publications has experienced an annual increase over the past 20 years, albeit with certain inverted S-shaped fluctuations and (2) the most prolific authors mainly included Wang L.Y., Zhang Z.L., and Wang Y.L., while well-known universities played a leading role in HC research in China. A significant finding was that a stable core group of authors or institutional has been not formed in the HC field. Furthermore, (3) research hotspots included health education, new media, health literacy, health information, animal husbandry and veterinary medicine (AHVM), the doctor–patient relationship, and public health emergencies. Additionally, the development of the field could be divided into four stages, indicating a significant shift in HC research from focusing on medicine and public health issues towards communication issues. Finally, (4) new research frontiers have mainly included the WeChat official account and Health China.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiong Dang & Zhongming Luo & Chuhao Ouyang & Lin Wang, 2021. "First Systematic Review on Health Communication Using the CiteSpace Software in China: Exploring Its Research Hotspots and Frontiers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13008-:d:698754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ah-Ram Kim & Hae Yean Park, 2021. "Theme Trends and Knowledge-Relationship in Lifestyle Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2020. "The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    4. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    5. Swastika Chandra & Masoud Mohammadnezhad, 2021. "Doctor–Patient Communication in Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Method Study in Fiji," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-12, July.
    6. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López‐Herrera & E. Herrera‐Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    7. Yating Zhao & Jingjing Guo & Chao Bao & Changyong Liang & Hemant K Jain, 2020. "Knowledge Graph Analysis of Human Health Research Related to Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Sirong Chen & Rob Law & Shaogui Xu & Mu Zhang, 2020. "Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Mobile Technology in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Lina Zhong & Baolin Deng & Alastair M. Morrison & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak & Liyu Yang, 2021. "Medical, Health and Wellness Tourism Research—A Review of the Literature (1970–2020) and Research Agenda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Francisco Diez-Martin & Alicia Blanco-Gonzalez & Camilo Prado-Roman, 2019. "Research Challenges in Digital Marketing: Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Mikel Vaquero-Solís & Miguel Angel Tapia-Serrano & David Hortigüela-Alcalá & Manuel Jacob-Sierra & Pedro Antonio Sánchez-Miguel, 2021. "Health Promotion through Movement Behaviors and Its Relationship with Quality of Life in Spanish High School Adolescents: A Predictive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanrong Qiu & Kaihuai Liao & Yanting Zou & Gengzhi Huang, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Research Regarding Residential Segregation and Health Based on CiteSpace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Xiaomei Luo & Yuduo Wu & Lina Niu & Lucheng Huang, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    2. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    3. Rui Qiu & Shuhua Hou & Xin Chen & Zhiyi Meng, 2021. "Green aviation industry sustainable development towards an integrated support system," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2441-2452, July.
    4. Xue Xiao & Martin Skitmore & Heng Li & Bo Xia, 2019. "Mapping Knowledge in the Economic Areas of Green Building Using Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Qiu, Rui & Hou, Shuhua & Meng, Zhiyi, 2021. "Low carbon air transport development trends and policy implications based on a scientometrics-based data analysis system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Mehdi Amirkhani & Igor Martek & Mark B. Luther, 2021. "Mapping Research Trends in Residential Construction Retrofitting: A Scientometric Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Xiaomei Luo & Yuduo Wu & Lina Niu & Lucheng Huang, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Liang Wang & Xiaolong Xue & Yuanxin Zhang & Xiaowei Luo, 2018. "Exploring the Emerging Evolution Trends of Urban Resilience Research by Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Maximilian Scheffler & Johannes Brunzel, 2020. "Destructive leadership in organizational research: a bibliometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 755-775, October.
    10. Hugo Baier-Fuentes & José M. Merigó & José Ernesto Amorós & Magaly Gaviria-Marín, 2019. "International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 385-429, June.
    11. Pingping Guo & Joanna Joseph Jeyaraj & Abu Bakar Razali, 2024. "A systematic review of collaborative mobile-assisted language learning (C-MALL) practices using bibliometric, content, and scientometric analyses," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Cao, Jidi & Chen, Xin & Qiu, Rui & Hou, Shuhua, 2021. "Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Chaomei Chen & Min Song, 2019. "Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Ileana Blanco & Luigi De Bellis & Andrea Luvisi, 2022. "Bibliometric Mapping of Research on Life Cycle Assessment of Olive Oil Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Bo Li & Zeshui Xu, 2021. "Insights into financial technology (FinTech): a bibliometric and visual study," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Xinxin Wang & Zeshui Xu & Yong Qin, 2022. "Structure, trend and prospect of operational research: a scientific analysis for publications from 1952 to 2020 included in Web of Science database," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 649-672, December.
    17. Rongrong Li & Feng Ren & Qiang Wang, 2024. "China–US scientific collaboration on sustainable development amidst geopolitical tensions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    19. Zuo, Zhili & Cheng, Jinhua & Guo, Haixiang & Li, Yonglin, 2021. "Knowledge mapping of research on strategic mineral resource security: A visual analysis using CiteSpace," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Liu, Aiping & Urquía-Grande, Elena & López-Sánchez, Pilar & Rodríguez-López, Ángel, 2023. "Research into microfinance and ICTs: A bibliometric analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13008-:d:698754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.