IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12851-d696237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Needs for International Benchmarking of Road Safety Management Based on Mobility Exposure Measures and Risk Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Guadalupe González-Sánchez

    (Research Group “Work and Transportation Management”, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Malaga, C/Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

  • María Isabel Olmo-Sánchez

    (Research Group “Work and Transportation Management”, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Malaga, C/Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

  • Elvira Maeso-González

    (Research Group “Work and Transportation Management”, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Malaga, C/Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

  • Mario Gutiérrez-Bedmar

    (Department of Public Health and Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga—IBIMA, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    CIBERCV Cardiovascular Diseases, Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Antonio García-Rodríguez

    (Department of Public Health and Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga—IBIMA, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

Abstract

Each year, 1.35 million people worldwide die due to Road Traffic Injuries (RTI), highlighting the need for further research. The risk of RTI is usually estimated as the number of casualties divided by the level of exposure in a population. Identifying the most appropriate exposure measures is one of the most important current challenges in this field. This paper presents an analysis of exposure measures used in empirical studies on road accidents. The results show a large variability in the exposure measures used, ranging from more general measures (such as population figures or vehicle fleet) to more specific measures related to mobility (such as number of trips, distances or travel time). A comparison of the risk patterns found shows that there is a partial consensus on the profiles with the highest risk of road traffic injuries. In conclusion, there is a need for the international standardization of criteria and data to be recorded, at least injury severity and measures of exposure to mobility, as the travel time disaggregated by socio-demographic variables and mode of transport. Such data would provide higher-quality results on risk profiles and facilitate the implementation of more effective, knowledge-based road safety policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Guadalupe González-Sánchez & María Isabel Olmo-Sánchez & Elvira Maeso-González & Mario Gutiérrez-Bedmar & Antonio García-Rodríguez, 2021. "Needs for International Benchmarking of Road Safety Management Based on Mobility Exposure Measures and Risk Patterns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12851-:d:696237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12851/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12851/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola Christie, 2018. "Why we need to view road safety through a public health lens?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 139-141, March.
    2. Gabriele Prati & Víctor Marín Puchades & Marco De Angelis & Federico Fraboni & Luca Pietrantoni, 2018. "Factors contributing to bicycle–motorised vehicle collisions: a systematic literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 184-208, March.
    3. Rachel Aldred, 2018. "Pedestrian injury risk: unanswered questions and a developing research agenda," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 685-688, November.
    4. Buehler, R. & Pucher, J., 2017. "Trends in walking and cycling safety: Recent evidence from high-income countries, with a focus on the United States and Germany," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(2), pages 281-287.
    5. Utriainen, Roni & Pöllänen, Markus & Liimatainen, Heikki, 2018. "Road safety comparisons with international data on seriously injured," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 138-145.
    6. Elias, Wafa & Benjamin, Julian & Shiftan, Yoram, 2015. "Gender differences in activity and travel behavior in the Arab world," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 19-27.
    7. Papadimitriou, Eleonora & Yannis, George, 2014. "Needs and priorities of road safety stakeholders for evidence-based policy making," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 286-294.
    8. Michela Papa & Virginia Boccardi & Raffaele Prestano & Edith Angellotti & Manuela Desiderio & Luigi Marano & Maria Rosaria Rizzo & Giuseppe Paolisso, 2014. "Comorbidities and Crash Involvement among Younger and Older Drivers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-6, April.
    9. Paefgen, Johannes & Staake, Thorsten & Fleisch, Elgar, 2014. "Multivariate exposure modeling of accident risk: Insights from Pay-as-you-drive insurance data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 27-40.
    10. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303546_3 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Joachim Scheiner & Christian Holz-Rau, 2007. "Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 487-511, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steve O’Hern & Roni Utriainen & Hanne Tiikkaja & Markus Pöllänen & Niina Sihvola, 2021. "Exploratory Analysis of Pedestrian Road Trauma in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Ding, Chuan & Wang, Donggen & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Yi & Yang, Jiawen, 2017. "Exploring the influence of built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of car ownership and travel distance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-80.
    3. Roger L. Mackett, 2022. "Gender, mental health and travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1891-1920, December.
    4. Sagaris, Lake, 2018. "Citizen participation for sustainable transport: Lessons for change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 402-410.
    5. Scheiner, Joachim & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2013. "A comprehensive study of life course, cohort, and period effects on changes in travel mode use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 167-181.
    6. Holz-Rau, Christian & Scheiner, Joachim, 2011. "Safety and travel time in cost-benefit analysis: A sensitivity analysis for North Rhine-Westphalia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 336-346, March.
    7. Scheiner, Joachim, 2010. "Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 679-690.
    8. Bae, Bumjoon & Seo, Changbeom, 2022. "Do public-private partnerships help improve road safety? Finding empirical evidence using panel data models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 336-342.
    9. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    10. Xinyu (Jason) Cao, 2009. "Disentangling the influence of neighborhood type and self-selection on driving behavior: an application of sample selection model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 207-222, March.
    11. Mononen, Petri & Leviäkangas, Pekka & Haapasalo, Harri, 2017. "From internal efficiency to societal benefits – Multi modal transport safety agency's socio-economic impact analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 78-90.
    12. Xinyu Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 2012. "The connections among accessibility, self- selection and walking behaviour: a case study of Northern California residents," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 5, pages 73-95, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Næss, Petter, 2012. "Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(2), pages 21-45.
    14. Aditjandra, Paulus Teguh & Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2013. "The influence of neighbourhood design on travel behaviour: Empirical evidence from North East England," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 54-65.
    15. Li, Xiaomeng & Pooyan Afghari, Amir & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar & Kaye, Sherrie-Anne & Haworth, Narelle, 2023. "Cyclists perception and self-reported behaviour towards interacting with fully automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Van Acker, Veronique & Witlox, Frank, 2010. "Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 65-74.
    17. Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Jayakumar, Malavika & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Potoglou, Dimitris, 2021. "Identification of key determinants of travel satisfaction for developing policy instrument to improve quality of life: An analysis of commuting in Delhi," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 281-292.
    18. Francesca Abastante & Isabella M. Lami & Luigi La Riccia & Marika Gaballo, 2020. "Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Filip Filipović & Dušan Mladenović & Krsto Lipovac & Dillip Kumar Das & Bojana Todosijević, 2022. "Determining Risk Factors That Influence Cycling Crash Severity, for the Purpose of Setting Sustainable Cycling Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Wafa Elias & Victoria Gitelman, 2018. "Youngsters’ Opinions and Attitudes toward the Use of Electric Bicycles in Israel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12851-:d:696237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.