IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12779-d694819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Office Design Support Employees’ Health? A Case Study on the Relationships among Employees’ Perceptions of the Office Environment, Their Sense of Coherence and Office Design

Author

Listed:
  • Melina Forooraghi

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Elke Miedema

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Nina Ryd

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Holger Wallbaum

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

This study investigated the current design circumstances of an office as well as employees’ perceptions of the office environment in relation to their perceived health, drawing on sense of coherence theory (comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness). Previous studies have related the physical office environment to employee health. However, most studies have focused on alleviating negative effects, while health-promoting potential, including employee sense of coherence, has been overlooked. This study adopted a mixed method case study approach, combining semi-structured interviews with employees, structured observations, and analysis of architectural drawings. The results indicated that employees’ perceptions did not always align with the ideas behind the architectural design and that employees understood the environment differently. The study also highlighted the interrelations (and contradictions) among the different components of sense of coherence. The findings imply that organizations may need to prioritize which components of coherence should be supported most by the office environment. It also suggests that case-specific design aspects should play a more central role in studying and conceptualizing healthy office design and that design solutions should be continuously modified during the use phase, while ensuring employees’ participation. The study concluded that an ‘ideal’ office environment should not be the goal. Instead, office design should provide an environment in which employees are able to cope with challenges in comprehensible, manageable and meaningful ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Melina Forooraghi & Elke Miedema & Nina Ryd & Holger Wallbaum, 2021. "How Does Office Design Support Employees’ Health? A Case Study on the Relationships among Employees’ Perceptions of the Office Environment, Their Sense of Coherence and Office Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12779-:d:694819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Clippard, Maria & Pfnür, Andreas, 2018. "The effectiveness of physical office environments for employee outcomes - An interdisciplinary perspective of research efforts," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110776, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Katarina Wijk & Eva L. Bergsten & David M. Hallman, 2020. "Sense of Coherence, Health, Well-Being, and Work Satisfaction before and after Implementing Activity-Based Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eva L. Bergsten & Katarina Wijk & David M. Hallman, 2022. "Implementation of Activity-Based Workplaces (ABW)—The Importance of Participation in Process Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Johan Larsson & Stig Vinberg & Helena Jahncke, 2022. "Changing the Office Design to Activity-Based Flexible Offices: A Longitudinal Study of How Managers’ Leadership Behaviours Are Perceived," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Sam S. S. Lau & Eric N. Y. Shum & Jackie O. T. Man & Ethan T. H. Cheung & Padmore Adusei Amoah & Angela Y. M. Leung & Orkan Okan & Kevin Dadaczynski, 2022. "A Cross-Sectional Study of the Perceived Stress, Well-Being and Their Relations with Work-Related Behaviours among Hong Kong School Leaders during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Martyna Joanna Surma & Richard Joseph Nunes & Caroline Rook & Angela Loder, 2021. "Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Minou Weijs-Perrée & Marko Orel & Felix Gauger & Andreas Pfnür, 2021. "User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between the Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2025-2048, October.
    6. Gauger, Felix & Pfnür, Andreas & Skarabi, Jan, 2020. "Arbeitswelten im Wandel: Coworking Spaces," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 119771, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Jamie Kelly, 2020. "The New "Covid-19" Home Office Worker: Evolving Computer-Human Interactions and the Perceived Value of Workplace Technology," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 13(1), pages 575-581, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12779-:d:694819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.