IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11564-d671566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crash Injury Severity Prediction Using an Ordinal Classification Machine Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shengxue Zhu

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Traffic and Transportation Security, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian 223003, China)

  • Ke Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Chongyi Li

    (Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the State Ministry of Education, College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

In many related works, nominal classification algorithms ignore the order between injury severity levels and make sub-optimal predictions. Existing ordinal classification methods suffer rank inconsistency and rank non-monotonicity. The aim of this paper is to propose an ordinal classification approach to predict traffic crash injury severity and to test its performance over existing machine learning classification methods. First, we compare the performance of the neural network, XGBoost, and SVM classifiers in injury severity prediction. Second, we utilize a severity category-combination method with oversampling to relieve the class-imbalance problem prevalent in crash data. Third, we take advantage of probability calibration and the optimal probability threshold moving to improve the prediction ability of ordinal classification. The proposed approach can satisfy the rank consistency and rank monotonicity requirement and is proved to be superior to other ordinal classification methods and nominal classification machine learning by statistical significance test. Important factors relating to injury severity are selected based on their permutation feature importance scores. We find that converting severity levels into three classes, minor injury, moderate injury, and serious injury, can substantially improve the prediction precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengxue Zhu & Ke Wang & Chongyi Li, 2021. "Crash Injury Severity Prediction Using an Ordinal Classification Machine Learning Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11564-:d:671566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verwaeren, Jan & Waegeman, Willem & De Baets, Bernard, 2012. "Learning partial ordinal class memberships with kernel-based proportional odds models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 928-942.
    2. Manze Guo & Zhenzhou Yuan & Bruce Janson & Yongxin Peng & Yang Yang & Wencheng Wang, 2021. "Older Pedestrian Traffic Crashes Severity Analysis Based on an Emerging Machine Learning XGBoost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangning Dong & Xuhao Zhu & Minghua Hu & Jie Bao, 2023. "A Methodology for Predicting Ground Delay Program Incidence through Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Yang, Yang & He, Kun & Wang, Yun-peng & Yuan, Zhen-zhou & Yin, Yong-hao & Guo, Man-ze, 2022. "Identification of dynamic traffic crash risk for cross-area freeways based on statistical and machine learning methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 595(C).
    3. Maciej Kruszyna & Marta Matczuk-Pisarek, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Selected Devices to Reduce the Speed of Vehicles on Pedestrian Crossings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Piotr Szagała & Piotr Olszewski & Witold Czajewski & Paweł Dąbkowski, 2021. "Active Signage of Pedestrian Crossings as a Tool in Road Safety Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Wenlong Tao & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Abdulrazak H. Almaliki & Rosilawati Zainol & Abdulrhman A. Almaliki & Enas E. Hussein, 2022. "An Advanced Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Pedestrian Fatality Caused by Road Crashes: A Step toward Sustainable Pedestrian Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Mubarak Alrumaidhi & Mohamed M. G. Farag & Hesham A. Rakha, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Parametric and Non-Parametric Data-Driven Models to Predict Road Crash Severity among Elderly Drivers Using Synthetic Resampling Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    7. Lei Yang & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Amin Jan & Belgacem Bouallegue & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Nermin M. Salem, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of the Optimized KNN, SVM, and Ensemble DT Models Using Bayesian Optimization for Predicting Pedestrian Fatalities: An Advance towards Realizing the Sustainable Safety of Pedestri," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Weijia (Vivian) Li & Kara M. Kockelman, 2022. "How does machine learning compare to conventional econometrics for transport data sets? A test of ML versus MLE," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 342-376, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11564-:d:671566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.