IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11473-d669372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep

Author

Listed:
  • Helen L. Ball

    (Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK)

  • Catherine E. Taylor

    (Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK)

  • Cassandra M. Yuill

    (School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK)

Abstract

Between 2016 and 2019, two different infant sleeping-box interventions were implemented in England: (1) shallow polypropylene baby boxes were distributed via a feasibility study to families with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) risk factors; and (2) a commercial–health system partnership scheme distributed cardboard baby boxes to new mothers in particular locations. We conducted parent evaluations of both interventions at the time of implementation. The views of 79 parents receiving polypropylene boxes and 77 parents receiving cardboard boxes were captured using online questionnaires and telephone interviews. Participants provided feedback on education received about using the box, their perception of the box design and materials, their experiences of using the box they received, and whether they would recommend it to others. Parents appreciated that both boxes provided a portable space to place their baby near them anywhere in the home, discouraging other riskier practices. The polypropylene box was rated more favourably regarding transparency, hygiene, and portability outside the home. A minority of parents found the idea of putting their baby in any box unappealing; however, younger mothers and smokers particularly appreciated the ability to safely co-sleep with their babies using the shallower box. Overall, the versatility of the polypropylene box scheme was more positively evaluated than the cardboard baby box scheme, which, stripped of its social value as part of a larger welfare provision, had minimal value for parents that received it.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen L. Ball & Catherine E. Taylor & Cassandra M. Yuill, 2021. "A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11473-:d:669372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annie Lau & Wendy Hall, 2016. "Safe sleep, day and night: mothers' experiences regarding infant sleep safety," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2816-2826, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blair-Hamilton, Alexis & Raphael, Dennis, 2023. "A critical analysis of the Finnish Baby Box’s journey into the liberal welfare state: Implications for progressive public policymaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roni Cole & Jeanine Young & Lauren Kearney & John M. D. Thompson, 2022. "Infant Care Practices, Caregiver Awareness of Safe Sleep Advice and Barriers to Implementation: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11473-:d:669372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.