IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2816-2826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safe sleep, day and night: mothers' experiences regarding infant sleep safety

Author

Listed:
  • Annie Lau
  • Wendy Hall

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To explore Canadian mothers' experiences with infant sleep safety. Background Parents decide when, how and where to place their infants to sleep. It is anticipated that they will follow international Sudden Infant Death Syndrome prevention sleep safety guidelines. Limited evidence is available for how parents take up guidelines; no studies have explored Canadian mothers’ experiences regarding infant sleep safety. Design An inductive qualitative descriptive study using some elements of grounded theory, including concurrent data collection and analysis and memoing. Methods Semi‐structured interviews and constant comparative analysis were employed to explore infant sleep safety experiences of 14 Canadian mothers residing in Metro Vancouver. Data collection commenced in December 2012 and ended in July 2013. Findings The core theme, Infant Sleep Safety Cycle, represents a cyclical process encompassing sleep safety from the prenatal period to the first six months of infants’ lives. The cyclical process includes five segments: mothers’ expectations of sleep safety, their struggles with reality as opposed to maternal visions, modifications of expectations, provision of rationale for choices and shifts in mothers’ views of infants’ developmental capabilities. Mothers’ experiences were influenced by four factors: perceptions of everyone's needs, familial influences, attitudes and judgments from outsiders and resource availability and accessibility. Conclusion To manage infants’ sleep, mothers reframed sleep safety guidelines and downplayed the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome for all forms of sleep at all times. Healthcare providers can support mothers’ efforts to manage their infants’ sleep challenges. During prenatal and postpartum periods, providers’ interventions can influence mothers’ efforts to adhere to sleep safety principles. Relevance to clinical practice The study findings support healthcare providers’ efforts to assist mothers to modify expectations and develop strategies to support sleep safety principles while acknowledging their challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Annie Lau & Wendy Hall, 2016. "Safe sleep, day and night: mothers' experiences regarding infant sleep safety," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2816-2826, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2816-2826
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13322
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roni Cole & Jeanine Young & Lauren Kearney & John M. D. Thompson, 2022. "Infant Care Practices, Caregiver Awareness of Safe Sleep Advice and Barriers to Implementation: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Helen L. Ball & Catherine E. Taylor & Cassandra M. Yuill, 2021. "A Box to Put the Baby in: UK Parent Perceptions of Two Baby Box Programmes Promoted for Infant Sleep," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2816-2826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.