IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10337-d647634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Abbreviated Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Abbreviated Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Psychometric Properties and Evaluation of the Czech Versions

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Sandora

    (Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Lukas Novak

    (Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Robert Brnka

    (Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
    First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Jitse P. van Dijk

    (Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
    Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
    Graduate School Kosice Institute for Society and Health, P.J. Safarik University in Kosice, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Peter Tavel

    (Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Klara Malinakova

    (Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x 2 (4) = 38.28; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x 2 (4) = 36.54; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95, McDonald’s omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95, McDonald’s omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Sandora & Lukas Novak & Robert Brnka & Jitse P. van Dijk & Peter Tavel & Klara Malinakova, 2021. "The Abbreviated Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Abbreviated Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Psychometric Properties and Evaluation of the Czech ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10337-:d:647634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Buuren, Stef & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin, 2011. "mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 45(i03).
    2. Klara Malinakova & Peter Tavel & Zdenek Meier & Jitse P. van Dijk & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2020. "Religiosity and Mental Health: A Contribution to Understanding the Heterogeneity of Research Findings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    4. Rob Eisinga & Manfred Grotenhuis & Ben Pelzer, 2013. "The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 637-642, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Osma & Víctor Martínez-Loredo & Amanda Díaz-García & Alba Quilez-Orden & Óscar Peris-Baquero, 2021. "Spanish Adaptation of the Overall Anxiety and Depression Severity and Impairment Scales in University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    2. Esef Hakan Toytok & Sungur Gürel, 2019. "Does Project Children’s University Increase Academic Self-Efficacy in 6th Graders? A Weak Experimental Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Kate R. Pawloski & Betty Kolod & Rabeea F. Khan & Vishal Midya & Tania Chen & Adeyemi Oduwole & Bernard Camins & Elena Colicino & I. Michael Leitman & Ismail Nabeel & Kristin Oliver & Damaskini Valvi, 2021. "Factors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Physician Trainees in New York City during the First COVID-19 Wave," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Sebastian Kurten & David Winant & Kathleen Beullens, 2021. "Mothers Matter: Using Regression Tree Algorithms to Predict Adolescents’ Sharing of Drunk References on Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Hayes, Timothy & McArdle, John J., 2017. "Should we impute or should we weight? Examining the performance of two CART-based techniques for addressing missing data in small sample research with nonnormal variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 35-52.
    6. Eva Spiritus-Beerden & An Verelst & Ines Devlieger & Nina Langer Primdahl & Fábio Botelho Guedes & Antonio Chiarenza & Stephanie De Maesschalck & Natalie Durbeej & Rocío Garrido & Margarida Gaspar de , 2021. "Mental Health of Refugees and Migrants during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Experienced Discrimination and Daily Stressors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Pierre O. Jacquet & Farid Pazhoohi & Charles Findling & Hugo Mell & Coralie Chevallier & Nicolas Baumard, 2021. "Predictive modeling of religiosity, prosociality, and moralizing in 295,000 individuals from European and non-European populations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Wim Lambrechts & Johannes (Joost) Platje & Anna Motylska-Kuźma & Bartosz Fortuński, 2021. "50 Shades of Green: Insights into Personal Values and Worldviews as Drivers of Green Purchasing Intention, Behaviour, and Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Eichelberger, Dominique A. & Sticca, Fabio & Kübler, Dinah R. & Kakebeeke, Tanja H. & Caflisch, Jon A. & Jenni, Oskar G. & Wehrle, Flavia M., 2023. "Stability of mental abilities and physical growth from 6 months to 65 years: Findings from the Zurich Longitudinal Studies," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Courtney M. Cooper & Jeff B. Langman & Dilshani Sarathchandra & Chantal A. Vella & Chloe B. Wardropper, 2020. "Perceived Risk and Intentions to Practice Health Protective Behaviors in a Mining-Impacted Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Kevin Petersen & Donald Papy & Alejandro Mouro & Barak Ariel, 2023. "The usage and utility of body‐worn camera footage in courts: A survey analysis of state prosecutors," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 534-569, September.
    12. Zhu, Xuan & Squiers, Linda & Helmueller, Leah & Madson, Gabriel & Southwell, Brian G. & Alam, Shama & Finney Rutten, Lila J., 2024. "Provider communication contributes to colorectal cancer screening intention through improving screening outcome expectancies and perceived behavioral control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    13. Monica E. Ellwood-Lowe & Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli & Silvia A. Bunge, 2021. "Brain network coupling associated with cognitive performance varies as a function of a child’s environment in the ABCD study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Stephanie Jütersonke & Martin Groß, 2023. "The Effect of Social Recognition on Support for Climate Change Mitigation Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Bence Csaba Farkas & Valérian Chambon & Pierre O. Jacquet, 2022. "Do perceived control and time orientation mediate the effect of early life adversity on reproductive behaviour and health status? Insights from the European Value Study and the European Social Survey," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Caitlin E. Carey & Rebecca Shafee & Robbee Wedow & Amanda Elliott & Duncan S. Palmer & John Compitello & Masahiro Kanai & Liam Abbott & Patrick Schultz & Konrad J. Karczewski & Samuel C. Bryant & Caro, 2024. "Principled distillation of UK Biobank phenotype data reveals underlying structure in human variation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(8), pages 1599-1615, August.
    17. Jeffrey M. DeVries & Carsten Szardenings & Philipp Doebler & Markus Gebhardt, 2021. "Subject-Specific Self-Concept and Global Self-Esteem Mediate Risk Factors for Lower Competency in Mathematics and Reading," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Michaelis, Timothy L. & Carr, Jon C. & Scheaf, David J. & Pollack, Jeffrey M., 2020. "The frugal entrepreneur: A self-regulatory perspective of resourceful entrepreneurial behavior," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    19. Nowak, Sarah A. & Parker, Andrew M. & Gidengil, Courtney A. & Richardson, Andrea S. & Walsh, Matthew M. & Kennedy, David P. & Vardavas, Raffaele, 2022. "Reciprocal relationships among influenza experiences, perceptions, and behavior: Results from a national, longitudinal survey of United States adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    20. Camilla Matera & Lars Dommermuth & Silvia Bacci & Bruno Bertaccini & Alessandra Minello & Daniele Vignoli, 2023. "Perceived Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions in Couples: A Dyadic Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 790-806, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10337-:d:647634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.