IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10244-d646013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Influencing Factors of the Recreational Utilization and Evaluation of Urban Ecological Protection Green Belts for Urban Renewal: A Case Study in Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Weiqi Zhao

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yun Wang

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Dan Chen

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Ling Wang

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Xiaomin Tang

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

With the continuous expansion of urban construction land, the green belts aiming for ecological protection have ensured a sustainable and effective function of regional ecosystem services. At the same time, these ecological green belts are expected to develop their compound service potentials with the development of cities. In order to meet the increasing demand of urban residents for the recreational utilization of urban green space, the primary function of the ecological green belts has transformed from being purely ecological to a combination of being ecological and recreational. Based on social media data, which has the characteristics of a large amount of accessible geographic information, this study used multiple regression models to analyze the recreational utilization intensity of ecological protection green belts with a case study in the green belt of Shanghai, China. The research results showed that the internal elements (total external area, water area, etc.) of the Shanghai green belt have positive correlations with its recreational utilization. The impact of external factors was inconclusive on the recreational utilization of the outer forest belt (the number of subway stations in accessibility factors was negatively correlated; the number of cultural facilities and the number of restaurants in the surrounding service facilities were positively related). Combined with the “Shanghai City Master Plan (2017–2035)”, this study suggests potential zones for the recreational transformation of the Shanghai green belt, provides a theoretical and practical basis for improving the recreational utilization of an urban ecological protection green belt and contributes to the sustainable development of ecological protection green belts in high-density cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiqi Zhao & Yun Wang & Dan Chen & Ling Wang & Xiaomin Tang, 2021. "Exploring the Influencing Factors of the Recreational Utilization and Evaluation of Urban Ecological Protection Green Belts for Urban Renewal: A Case Study in Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10244-:d:646013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Powell, K.E. & Martin, L.M. & Chowdhury, P.P., 2003. "Places to Walk: Convenience and Regular Physical Activity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1519-1521.
    2. Kassahun Gashu & Tegegne Gebre-Egziabher & Mulatu Wubneh, 2020. "Local communities’ perceptions and use of urban green infrastructure in two Ethiopian cities: Bahir Dar and Hawassa," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(2), pages 287-316, January.
    3. La Paix Puello, Lissy & Chowdhury, Saidul & Geurs, Karst, 2019. "Using panel data for modelling duration dynamics of outdoor leisure activities," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 141-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiwen Ji & Lang Zhang & Xinchen Gu & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Regional Green Space Morphology Outside Built-Up Areas based on the Google Earth Engine and Biophysical Component Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Macdonald, Elizabeth & Harper, Alethea & Williams, Jeff & Hayter, Jason A., 2006. "Street Trees and Intersection Safety," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4sk6m275, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Bentley, Rebecca & Jolley, Damien & Kavanagh, Anne Marie, 2010. "Local environments as determinants of walking in Melbourne, Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1806-1815, June.
    3. Borkowski, Przemysław & Jażdżewska-Gutta, Magdalena & Szmelter-Jarosz, Agnieszka, 2021. "Lockdowned: Everyday mobility changes in response to COVID-19," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Dagmar Sigmundová & Walid El Ansari & Erik Sigmund, 2011. "Neighbourhood Environment Correlates of Physical Activity: A Study of Eight Czech Regional Towns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Eun Jung Kim & Young-Jae Kim, 2019. "A Reliability Check of Walkability Indices in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Dalton Erick Baltazar & Jillian Labadz & Roy Smith & Andrew Telford & Marcello Di Bonito, 2022. "Socio-Cultural Valuation of Urban Parks: The Case of Jose Rizal Plaza in Calamba City, The Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Halkos, George & Leonti, Aikaterini & Sardianou, Eleni, 2021. "Activities, motivations and satisfaction of urban parks visitors: A structural equation modeling analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 502-513.
    8. Sharmin, Samia & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2017. "Association between the built environment and children's independent mobility: A meta-analytic review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 104-117.
    9. Shruti Ashish Lahoti & Ashish Lahoti & Shalini Dhyani & Osamu Saito, 2023. "Preferences and Perception Influencing Usage of Neighborhood Public Urban Green Spaces in Fast Urbanizing Indian City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Veronika Harantová & Alica Kalašová & Simona Skřivánek Kubíková & Jaroslav Mazanec & Radomíra Jordová, 2022. "The Impact of Mobility on Shopping Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Evidence from the Slovak Republic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Buket Aydemir & Güney Çetinkaya & Abdullah Güngör & Ece Ömüriş, 2024. "Understanding the visitor complaints about urban green spaces: a thematic investigation of online reviews on nation gardens in Istanbul, Türkiye," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Stephen Dobson, 2015. "Urban translations: Regeneration through the lens of actor-networking," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 944-960, December.
    13. Reisi Marzieh & Nadoushan Mozhgan Ahmadi & Aye Lu, 2019. "Local walkability index: assessing built environment influence on walking," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 46(46), pages 7-21, December.
    14. Vera Ferreira & Ana Paula Barreira & Luís Loures & Dulce Antunes & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    15. Leïla Traoré & Bienvenue Belinga & Guillaume Lescuyer, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Scope and Patterns of Green Consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Dan McCole & Tatiana A. Iretskaia & Elizabeth E. Perry & Jungho Suh & John Noyes, 2022. "Park Design Informed by Stated Preference Choice: Integrating User Perspectives into the Development of an Off-Road Vehicle Park in Michigan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Walton, Emily, 2014. "Vital places: Facilitators of behavioral and social health mechanisms in low-income neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Marcela Mello Soares & Emanuella Gomes Maia & Rafael Moreira Claro, 2020. "Availability of public open space and the practice of leisure-time physical activity among the Brazilian adult population," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(8), pages 1467-1476, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10244-:d:646013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.