Author
Listed:
- Caiyun Cui
(Architectural Engineering College, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang 065201, China)
- Linzhi Xie
(Architectural Engineering College, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang 065201, China)
- Yong Liu
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)
- Xiaowei Han
(Jiangsu Subei Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd., Suqian 223600, China)
- Qing Chen
(School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)
- Bo Xia
(School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)
- Martin Skitmore
(Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia)
Abstract
Considering that emergency infrastructure projects (EIPs) play a significant role in the response to urgent events globally, the public’s perceived efficacy with respect to EIPs has become increasingly critical guidance for infrastructure systems and advancing cities’ sustainability. The interactions between the public and governments are deemed to be instrumental in enhancing the perceived efficacy. Concurrently, psychological distance, which can influence individuals’ thoughts and behaviors, is seen as a beneficial method of boosting the public’s perception of the effectiveness of EIPs. However, the underlying mechanism linking interaction, psychological distance, and perceived efficacy in relation to EIPs remains largely unexplored. In the current study, a theoretical framework was established through a literature review, leading to the formulation of four hypotheses. These hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling based on data collected from a questionnaire survey of 337 residents regarding Leishenshan Hospital. The findings indicate that, firstly, interaction directly affects the public’s psychological distance and perceived efficacy. Secondly, the public’s psychological distance from EIPs directly affects the public’s perceived efficacy. Thirdly, the public’s psychological distance from EIPs plays a mediating role between interaction and perceived efficacy. These findings enhance the theoretical understanding of Environmental Innovation Policy (EIP) governance, aiming to maximize public welfare by effectively addressing unexpected crisis events and promoting the sustainable development of cities and society.
Suggested Citation
Caiyun Cui & Linzhi Xie & Yong Liu & Xiaowei Han & Qing Chen & Bo Xia & Martin Skitmore, 2025.
"Advancing Cities’ Sustainability: Exploring the Effects of Interaction on the Public’s Perceived Efficacy of Emergency Infrastructure Projects—A Psychological Distance Perspective,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:665-:d:1568296
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:665-:d:1568296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.