IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9151-d625599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Test Ag 2019-nCoV (PROGNOSIS, BIOTECH, Larissa, Greece); Performance Evaluation in Hospital Setting with Real Time RT-PCR

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Kyritsi

    (Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Alexandros Vontas

    (Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Ioanna Voulgaridi

    (Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Alexia Matziri

    (Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Apostolos Komnos

    (Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece)

  • Dimitris Babalis

    (Emergency Department, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece)

  • Antonios Papadogoulas

    (Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece)

  • Aikaterini Oikonomou

    (Internal Medicine, First Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece)

  • Varvara A. Mouchtouri

    (Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Matthaios Speletas

    (Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Christos Hadjichristodoulou

    (Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece)

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid antigen tests (RATs) are convenient for SARS-CoV-2 detection because they are simpler and faster than nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). This study aimed to assess the accuracy of a locally manufactured test; Rapid Test Ag 2019-nCoV (PROGNOSIS, BIOTECH, Larissa, Greece) in a clinical setting and during mass screening. Methods: Nasopharyngeal samples from 624 individuals were analyzed. The results of the rapid test were compared to real-time reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). At the end of the test’s procedure, positive test strips were scanned in an S-Flow reader in order to roughly estimate the antigen concentration. Results: The lower limit of detection of the test was 468.75 genome copies/mL. The PROGNOSIS rapid test displayed a sensitivity of 85.5% (141/165) (95%CI: 79.1–90.5) and a specificity of 99.8% (458/459) (95%CI: 98.8–100.0%). The general inter-rater agreement was 0.89 (95%CI: 85.1–93.3). The regression analysis between the S-flow reader measurements (viral antigen) and the viral load of the positive samples demonstrated a weak correlation (R 2 = 0.288, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Rapid Test Ag 2019-nCoV demonstrated sufficient sensitivity, excellent specificity and could be available to be used with low overall cost. Thus, it could be used as point of care test, but also for mass screening for rapid detection of infected persons (e.g., for travelers).

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Kyritsi & Alexandros Vontas & Ioanna Voulgaridi & Alexia Matziri & Apostolos Komnos & Dimitris Babalis & Antonios Papadogoulas & Aikaterini Oikonomou & Varvara A. Mouchtouri & Matthaios Speletas, 2021. "Rapid Test Ag 2019-nCoV (PROGNOSIS, BIOTECH, Larissa, Greece); Performance Evaluation in Hospital Setting with Real Time RT-PCR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-8, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9151-:d:625599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth L. Anderson & Paul Turnham & John R. Griffin & Chester C. Clarke, 2020. "Consideration of the Aerosol Transmission for COVID‐19 and Public Health," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 902-907, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anwar A. Sayed, 2021. "The Progressive Public Measures of Saudi Arabia to Tackle Covid-19 and Limit Its Spread," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Joseph Ching & Mizuo Kajino, 2020. "Rethinking Air Quality and Climate Change after COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Tu, Yunbo & Meng, Xinzhu & Alzahrani, Abdullah Khames & Zhang, Tonghua, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization and nonlinear dynamics for sub-healthy COVID-19 epidemic model subject to self-diffusion and cross-diffusion," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    4. Prateek Bansal & Roselinde Kessels & Rico Krueger & Daniel J Graham, 2021. "Face masks, vaccination rates and low crowding drive the demand for the London Underground during the COVID-19 pandemic," Papers 2107.02394, arXiv.org.
    5. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: Evidence from public waiting lines," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2020-305, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 765-781.
    7. Bansal, Prateek & Kessels, Roselinde & Krueger, Rico & Graham, Daniel J., 2022. "Preferences for using the London Underground during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 45-60.
    8. Jack Sutton & Golnaz Shahtahmassebi & Haroldo V Ribeiro & Quentin S Hanley, 2022. "Population density and spreading of COVID-19 in England and Wales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Yu Fu & Shaofu Lin & Zhenkai Xu, 2022. "Research on Quantitative Analysis of Multiple Factors Affecting COVID-19 Spread," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Davide Bosco & Luca Portoghese, 2024. "Complementarity, Congestion and Information Design in Epidemics with Strategic Social Behaviour," DEM Working Papers Series 218, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    11. Lawrence O Flowers, 2020. "COVID-19 and the Cytokine Storm," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 29(4), pages 22644-22647, August.
    12. Núria Boix Rodríguez & Giovanni Formentini & Claudio Favi & Marco Marconi, 2021. "Engineering Design Process of Face Masks Based on Circularity and Life Cycle Assessment in the Constraint of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9151-:d:625599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.