IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8157-d606690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Olfactometry to Assess the Anti-Odor Properties of Filtering Facepiece Respirators Containing Activated Carbon Nonwovens

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Okrasa

    (Department of Personal Protective Equipment, Central Institute for Labor Protection—National Research Institute, Wierzbowa 48, 90-133 Łódź, Poland)

  • Justyna Szulc

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Łódź, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Brochocka

    (Department of Personal Protective Equipment, Central Institute for Labor Protection—National Research Institute, Wierzbowa 48, 90-133 Łódź, Poland)

  • Beata Gutarowska

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Łódź, Poland)

Abstract

Filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) with anti-odor properties are used to reduce odor nuisance occurring both in everyday life and at workplaces. Unfortunately, there are no standardized methods to measure the efficiency of odor reduction of such personal protective devices. This paper aims to determine whether olfactometric-based methods, commonly used in environmental studies, can be employed for this purpose. The proposed procedure is based on the detection of n-butanol by study participants, and it consists of three subsequent stages: (i) defining the individual levels of odor sensitivity of each study participant; (ii) determining THE odor detection level while using FFRs with varying anti-odor properties; and (iii) completing a questionnaire concerning the subjective perceptions of study participants. As a measure of odor reduction efficiency, a coefficient W, defined as a quotient of the degree of odor reduction by the FFR, and the individual odor sensitivity of the subject, was proposed. The experimental results showed the ability of our measure to differentiate the effectiveness of odor reduction of tested FFRs. This indicates that it can be potentially employed as the assessment tool to confirm the effectiveness of such respiratory protective devices as a control measure mitigating the adverse effects of malodors on workers’ health, cognition, and behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Okrasa & Justyna Szulc & Agnieszka Brochocka & Beata Gutarowska, 2021. "Application of Olfactometry to Assess the Anti-Odor Properties of Filtering Facepiece Respirators Containing Activated Carbon Nonwovens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8157-:d:606690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Okrasa & Jörn Hitz & Aleksandra Nowak & Agnieszka Brochocka & Christoph Thelen & Zbigniew Walczak, 2019. "Adsorption Performance of Activated-Carbon-Loaded Nonwoven Filters Used in Filtering Facepiece Respirators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Justyna Skóra & Katarzyna Matusiak & Piotr Wojewódzki & Adriana Nowak & Michael Sulyok & Anna Ligocka & Małgorzata Okrasa & Janusz Hermann & Beata Gutarowska, 2016. "Evaluation of Microbiological and Chemical Contaminants in Poultry Farms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Mohamed A. Eltarkawe & Shelly L. Miller, 2018. "The Impact of Industrial Odors on the Subjective Well-Being of Communities in Colorado," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Horton, R.A. & Wing, S. & Marshall, S.W. & Brownley, K.A., 2009. "Malodor as a trigger of stress and negative mood in neighbors of industrial hog operations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(S3), pages 610-615.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwideok Han & Jeffrey Vitale & Yong-Geon Lee & Inbae Ji, 2022. "Measuring the Economic Value of the Negative Externality of Livestock Malodor in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Leah Baskin-Graves & Haley Mullen & Aaron Aber & Jair Sinisterra & Kamran Ayub & Roxana Amaya-Fuentes & Sacoby Wilson, 2019. "Rapid Health Impact Assessment of a Proposed Poultry Processing Plant in Millsboro, Delaware," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Valérie Eijrond & Liesbeth Claassen & Joke van der Giessen & Danielle Timmermans, 2019. "Intensive Livestock Farming and Residential Health: Experts’ Views," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Mohamed Eltarkawe & Shelly Miller, 2019. "Industrial Odor Source Identification Based on Wind Direction and Social Participation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Mary A. Fox & L. Elizabeth Brewer & Lawrence Martin, 2017. "An Overview of Literature Topics Related to Current Concepts, Methods, Tools, and Applications for Cumulative Risk Assessment (2007–2016)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Jung Hee Jang & Gi Bo Han, 2020. "Effect of Surface Treatment by O 3 and Chemical Activation by Alkali Metal on the Performance of ACFs on Adsorption and Desorption of BTX Gases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Saúl López-Aguilar & Randy H. Adams & Verónica Isidra Domínguez-Rodríguez & José A. Gaspar-Génico & Joel Zavala-Cruz & Edith Hernández-Natarén, 2020. "Soil Odor as An Extra-Official Criterion for Qualifying Remediation Projects of Crude Oil-Contaminated Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Beata Gutarowska & Justyna Szulc & Adriana Nowak & Anna Otlewska & Małgorzata Okrasa & Anita Jachowicz & Katarzyna Majchrzycka, 2018. "Dust at Various Workplaces—Microbiological and Toxicological Threats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Egide Kalisa & Stephen Archer & Edward Nagato & Elias Bizuru & Kevin Lee & Ning Tang & Stephen Pointing & Kazuichi Hayakawa & Donnabella Lacap-Bugler, 2019. "Chemical and Biological Components of Urban Aerosols in Africa: Current Status and Knowledge Gaps," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Wu, Qinqin & Hao, Ying & Lu, Jing, 2018. "Air pollution, stock returns, and trading activities in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 342-365.
    11. Ivica Ravić & Mario Ostović & Anamaria Ekert Kabalin & Matija Kovačić & Kristina Matković & Željko Gottstein & Danijela Horvatek Tomić, 2024. "Dust and Bacterial Air Contamination in a Broiler House in Summer and Winter," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8157-:d:606690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.