IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7156-d588275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Performance Index for Integrated Management System: GPI-IMS

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Silvestri

    (Department of Civil and Mechanics Engineering (DICEM), University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Domenico Falcone

    (Department of Civil and Mechanics Engineering (DICEM), University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Gianpaolo Di Bona

    (Department of Civil and Mechanics Engineering (DICEM), University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Antonio Forcina

    (Department of Engineering, Isola C4, Centro Direzionale Napoli, University of Naples “Parthenope”, 80143 Naples, Italy)

  • Marco Gemmiti

    (INTIT Srl, 03013 Ferentino, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The present work starts from a literature review of the evolution of Integrated Management Systems (IMSs), considering different points of view and standards: quality, environmental, occupational health and safety, sustainability and social issues. Even if the benefits are possible, there is not a common approach and a clear link between the integration of management systems and business performance, in particular considering safety performance. Methods: The present study analyzes the application of Risk Assessment in order to realize the integration of management systems. The main objective is to provide a tool for an integrated evaluation of all company performances, starting from the definition of some Key Performance Indicators—KPIs—proposed for a particular case study, even if their choice is not the core of the paper. The assessment team members on the basis of their knowledge, experience and useful literature, could choose the right KPIs for the specific application, able to take a picture of the current state and to suggest a possible recommended action of improving. The proposed Risk Assessment approach is an integration of modern management techniques: Integrated Management System and Improving Cycle DMAIC. Results: The new method, called the Global Performance Index for Integrated Management System—GPI-IMS, has been applied to a real case study in the logistic field in order to evaluate its goodness and possible generalization. Conclusions: The proposed method allows to define the requirements that any company must have to perform the best. The role of the assessment team is very important to evaluate the global performance of the company and to suggest the corrective actions to be adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Silvestri & Domenico Falcone & Gianpaolo Di Bona & Antonio Forcina & Marco Gemmiti, 2021. "Global Performance Index for Integrated Management System: GPI-IMS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7156-:d:588275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristina Oskarsson & Fredrik von Malmborg, 2005. "Integrated management systems as a corporate response to sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 121-128, September.
    2. Atanu Chaudhuri & Jayanth Jayaram, 2019. "A socio-technical view of performance impact of integrated quality and sustainability strategies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1478-1496, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucian Ispas & Costel Mironeasa & Alessandro Silvestri, 2023. "Risk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigo Lozano & Robin von Haartman, 2018. "Reinforcing the Holistic Perspective of Sustainability: Analysis of the Importance of Sustainability Drivers in Organizations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 508-522, July.
    2. Scott Victor Valentine, 2010. "The Green Onion: a corporate environmental strategy framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(5), pages 284-298, September.
    3. Luis Fonseca & Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Shou, Yongyi & Zhao, Xinyu & Dai, Jing & Xu, Dong, 2021. "Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: Achieving operational innovation for superior performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Susana Garrido Azevedo & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2017. "Proposal of a Sustainable Circular Index for Manufacturing Companies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Rodrigo Lozano, 2020. "Analysing the use of tools, initiatives, and approaches to promote sustainability in corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 982-998, March.
    7. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Arménio Rego & João Vieira da Cunha, 2008. "Ecocentric management: an update," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 311-321, November.
    8. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Castilla Polo, Francisca & Gallardo Vázquez, Dolores, 2008. "Social information within the intellectual capital report," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 353-363, December.
    10. Stig Larssaether & André Nijhof, 2009. "Moral landscapes – understanding agency in corporate responsibility initiatives," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 228-236, July.
    11. Pedro Teixeira & Arnaldo Coelho & Pedro Fontoura & José Carlos Sá & Francisco J. G. Silva & Gilberto Santos & Luis P. Ferreira, 2022. "Combining lean and green practices to achieve a superior performance: The contribution for a sustainable development and competitiveness—An empirical study on the Portuguese context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 887-903, July.
    12. Anette von Ahsen, 2014. "The Integration of Quality, Environmental and Health and Safety Management by Car Manufacturers – a Long‐Term Empirical Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(6), pages 395-416, September.
    13. Anette Hallin & Tina Karrbom Gustavsson, 2009. "Managing death – corporate social responsibility and tragedy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 206-216, July.
    14. Rodrigo Lozano, 2015. "A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 32-44, January.
    15. Deanna Kemp, 2010. "Community relations in the global mining industry: exploring the internal dimensions of externally orientated work," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Kuo-Jui Wu & Qing Chen & Yun Qi & Xiaoyue Jiang & Shuo Gao & Ming-Lang Tseng, 2019. "Sustainable Development Performance for Small and Medium Enterprises Using a Fuzzy Synthetic Method-DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Andrew Ngawenja Mzembe, 2016. "Doing Stakeholder Engagement Their own Way: Experience from the Malawian Mining Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. George H. Ionescu & Daniela Firoiu & Ramona Pîrvu & Roxana Bădîrcea & Cristian Drăgan, 2018. "Implementation of Integrated Management Systems and Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives—A Romanian Hospitality Industry Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Gallardo-Vázquez, Dolores & Sánchez-Hernández, María Isabel & Corchuelo-Martinez-Azua, María Beatriz, 2013. "Validación de un instrumento de medida para la relación entre la orientación a la responsabilidad social corporativa y otras variables estratégicas de la empresa," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23.
    20. Peter Dobers, 2009. "Corporate social responsibility: management and methods," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 185-191, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7156-:d:588275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.