IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6324-d573053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing a Care Pathway for Complex Chronic Patients from a Nursing Perspective: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rosario Fernández-Peña

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain
    IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, 39011 Santander, Spain
    SALBIS Research Group, University of León, 24400 León, Spain)

  • Carmen Ortego-Maté

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain
    IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Francisco José Amo-Setién

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain
    IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Tamara Silió-García

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain
    IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Antoni Casasempere-Satorres

    (CualSoft-Qualitative Research Consulting Services, 03803 Alcoy, Spain)

  • Carmen Sarabia-Cobo

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain
    IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, 39011 Santander, Spain)

Abstract

A care pathway constitutes a complex care strategy for decision-making and the organization of processes in the care of complex chronic patients, avoiding the fragmentation of care. Health professionals play a decisive role in the implementation, development, and evaluation of care pathways. This study sought to explore nurses’ opinions on the care pathway for complex chronic patients three years after its implementation. The study participants were thirteen nurses with different roles who were involved in the care pathway. Thematic content analysis of the semi-structured interviews resulted in four major themes: (a) the strengths of the route; (b) the impact of the route on caregivers; (c) the weaknesses of the route; and (d) the future of the route. Overall, the pathway was positively valued for the benefits it provides to patients, the caregiver, and the administration of professional health care. Participants voiced their concerns regarding: communication and coordination difficulties among professionals across the different levels of care, the need for improved teamwork and consensus among professionals at the same center, and human and material resources. The ongoing evaluation and monitoring of facilitators and barriers is necessary throughout the implementation process, to ensure continuity and quality of care in the health system.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosario Fernández-Peña & Carmen Ortego-Maté & Francisco José Amo-Setién & Tamara Silió-García & Antoni Casasempere-Satorres & Carmen Sarabia-Cobo, 2021. "Implementing a Care Pathway for Complex Chronic Patients from a Nursing Perspective: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6324-:d:573053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbons, D.E., 2007. "Interorganizational network structures and diffusion of information through a health system," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(9), pages 1684-1692.
    2. Varda, D. & Shoup, J.A. & Miller, S., 2012. "A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: Implications for public health practice and research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(3), pages 564-571.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Eun Lee & Jung Hye Sung & Daniel Sarpong & Jimmy T. Efird & Paul B. Tchounwou & Elizabeth Ofili & Keith Norris, 2018. "Knowledge Management for Fostering Biostatistical Collaboration within a Research Network: The RTRN Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Katarzyna Grondys, 2019. "Implementation of the Sharing Economy in the B2B Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Martin Pech & DrahoÅ¡ VanÄ›Ä ek & Jaroslava Pražáková, 2021. "Complexity, continuity, and strategic management of buyer–supplier relationships from a network perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(3), pages 189-226.
    4. Lennart Reifels & Amy Morgan & Lay San Too & Marisa Schlichthorst & Michelle Williamson & Helen Jordan, 2021. "What Works in Community-Led Suicide Prevention: Perspectives of Wesley LifeForce Network Coordinators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Isabel Cristina Panziera Marques & Mário Franco, 2020. "Cooperation networks in the area of health: systematic literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1727-1750, March.
    6. Yudan Dou & Xiaolong Xue & Zebin Zhao & Xiaowei Luo, 2019. "Factors Influence China’s Off-Site Construction Technology Innovation Diffusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Aida Budrevičiūtė & Ramunė Kalėdienė & Jadvyga Petrauskienė, 2018. "Priorities in effective management of primary health care institutions in Lithuania: Perspectives of managers of public and private primary health care institutions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Cheng, Xiu & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Yang, Jiahui, 2019. "Does social interaction have an impact on residents’ sustainable lifestyle decisions? A multi-agent stimulation based on regret and game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Rocco Palumbo & Mohammad Fakhar Manesh & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Giulia Flamini, 2020. "Exploiting Inter-Organizational Relationships in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Patnaik, Swetketu & Pereira, Vijay & Temouri, Yama & Malik, Ashish & Roohanifar, Mohammad, 2020. "The dance of power and trust-exploring micro-foundational dimensions in the development of global health partnership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Joohyun Kim & Ohsung Kwon & Duk Hee Lee, 2019. "Observing Cascade Behavior Depending on the Network Topology and Transaction Costs," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 207-225, January.
    12. Didem Gündoğdu & Pietro Panzarasa & Nuria Oliver & Bruno Lepri, 2019. "The bridging and bonding structures of place-centric networks: Evidence from a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Wäsche, Hagen, 2015. "Interorganizational cooperation in sport tourism: A social network analysis," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 542-554.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6324-:d:573053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.