IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0209816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priorities in effective management of primary health care institutions in Lithuania: Perspectives of managers of public and private primary health care institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Aida Budrevičiūtė
  • Ramunė Kalėdienė
  • Jadvyga Petrauskienė

Abstract

Background: Primary health care institutions are looking for opportunities to create value for patients and to increase the competitiveness of the health care institution. Determination of competitive priorities for creation of value for patients in the management of primary health care institutions allows improving competitiveness and achieving a competitive advantage in the market. The aim of the study: To determine the priorities in the management of public and private primary health care institutions by using the focus group discussion method with managers. Methods: The study was exploratory with intention to find a ground for a management theory and to be the root for the development of health care reform in Lithuania. Focus group discussions were held in 10 Lithuanian counties; 10 focus group sessions were carried out. A total of 48 primary health care executives were interviewed. The participants of this qualitative study were given 8 questions related to value creation of the primary health care institution to patients and rise in competitiveness. The main question of the focus group discussion was “What are the main priorities of management of primary health care institution?” The criteria of data collection based on the deep understanding of the phenomenon and the richness of data expressed by participants of the research. Results: Qualitative research showed that the priorities of management of primary health care institutions were work management of an organization; human resources management; patient management; and health policy decision making. The participants of focus groups pointed out that effective work of primary health care institutions is ensured by the model of management, doctor-patient communication, quality and timely delivery of health care services, and financial resources. The major decisions involving the management of patients were as follows: meeting patients’ expectations, quality and timely satisfaction of patients’ needs, effective solution of patients’ problems, patient-centered services, patient satisfaction, and communication with the patient. Accessibility to services, quality, geographical accessibility, disease prevention, strengthening of patients’ health and adequate funding were mentioned as the priorities of health policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Aida Budrevičiūtė & Ramunė Kalėdienė & Jadvyga Petrauskienė, 2018. "Priorities in effective management of primary health care institutions in Lithuania: Perspectives of managers of public and private primary health care institutions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0209816
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209816
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209816&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0209816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Butler & G. Leong, 2000. "The impact of operations competitive priorities on hospital performance," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 227-235, June.
    2. Varda, D. & Shoup, J.A. & Miller, S., 2012. "A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: Implications for public health practice and research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(3), pages 564-571.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jackline Sitienei & Lenore Manderson & Mabel Nangami, 2021. "Community participation in the collaborative governance of primary health care facilities, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Eun Lee & Jung Hye Sung & Daniel Sarpong & Jimmy T. Efird & Paul B. Tchounwou & Elizabeth Ofili & Keith Norris, 2018. "Knowledge Management for Fostering Biostatistical Collaboration within a Research Network: The RTRN Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Main Naser Alolayyan & Ahmmed Saadi Ibrahem, 2021. "Proposed Mathematical Model to Study and Analyze the Relationship Between Operational Flexibility Dimensions and Hospital Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(4), pages 289-305, December.
    3. Katarzyna Grondys, 2019. "Implementation of the Sharing Economy in the B2B Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Lennart Reifels & Amy Morgan & Lay San Too & Marisa Schlichthorst & Michelle Williamson & Helen Jordan, 2021. "What Works in Community-Led Suicide Prevention: Perspectives of Wesley LifeForce Network Coordinators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Isabel Cristina Panziera Marques & Mário Franco, 2020. "Cooperation networks in the area of health: systematic literature review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1727-1750, March.
    6. Rosario Fernández-Peña & Carmen Ortego-Maté & Francisco José Amo-Setién & Tamara Silió-García & Antoni Casasempere-Satorres & Carmen Sarabia-Cobo, 2021. "Implementing a Care Pathway for Complex Chronic Patients from a Nursing Perspective: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Patnaik, Swetketu & Pereira, Vijay & Temouri, Yama & Malik, Ashish & Roohanifar, Mohammad, 2020. "The dance of power and trust-exploring micro-foundational dimensions in the development of global health partnership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Bichescu, Bogdan C. & Bradley, Randy V. & Smith, Antoinette L. & Wei, Wu, 2018. "Benefits and implications of competing on process excellence: Evidence from California hospitals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 59-68.
    9. Wäsche, Hagen, 2015. "Interorganizational cooperation in sport tourism: A social network analysis," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 542-554.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0209816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.