IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6181-d570717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breastfeeding Communication Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities in the Twitter-Verse: Perspectives of Influencers and Social Network Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Moukarzel

    (Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation Mother-Milk-Infant Center of Research Excellence, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA
    Department of Education Studies, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA)

  • Anita Caduff

    (Department of Education Studies, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA)

  • Martin Rehm

    (Institute of Educational Consulting, University of Education Weingarten, 88250 Weingarten, Germany)

  • Miguel del Fresno

    (Department of Social Work, National Distance Education University, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rafael Pérez-Escamilla

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA)

  • Alan J. Daly

    (Department of Education Studies, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA)

Abstract

Using social media is one important strategy to communicate research and public health guidelines to the scientific community and general public. Empirical evidence about which communication strategies are effective around breastfeeding messaging is scarce. To fill this gap, we aimed to identify influencers in the largest available Twitter database using social network analysis ( n = 10,694 users), inductively analyze tweets, and explore communication strategies, motivations, and challenges via semi-structured interviews. Influencers had diverse backgrounds within and beyond the scientific health community (SHC; 42.7%): 54.7% were from the general public and 3% were companies. SHC contributed to most of the tweets ( n = 798 tweets), disseminating guidelines and research findings more frequently than others ( p < 0.001). Influencers from the general community mostly tweeted opinions regarding the current state of breastfeeding research and advocacy. Interviewees provided practical strategies (e.g., preferred visuals, tone, and writing style) to achieve personal and societal goals including career opportunities, community support, and improved breastfeeding practices. Complex challenges that need to be addressed were identified. Ideological differences regarding infant feeding may be hampering constructive communication, including differences in influencers’ interpretation of the WHO International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and in perspectives regarding which social media interactions encompass conflict of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Moukarzel & Anita Caduff & Martin Rehm & Miguel del Fresno & Rafael Pérez-Escamilla & Alan J. Daly, 2021. "Breastfeeding Communication Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities in the Twitter-Verse: Perspectives of Influencers and Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6181-:d:570717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grover, Purva & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Davies, Gareth, 2018. "“Technology enabled Health” – Insights from twitter analytics with a socio-technical perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 85-97.
    2. Perkins, Jessica M. & Subramanian, S.V. & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2015. "Social networks and health: A systematic review of sociocentric network studies in low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 60-78.
    3. Sinnenberg, L. & Buttenheim, A.M. & Padrez, K. & Mancheno, C. & Ungar, L. & Merchant, R.M., 2017. "Twitter as a tool for health research: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(1), pages 1-8.
    4. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303512_4 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Karen E. Sutherland, 2021. "Strategic Social Media Management," Springer Books, Springer, edition 1, number 978-981-15-4658-7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Min & Zhang, Dongxin & Zhang, Yin & Yeager, Kristin & Fields, Taylor N., 2023. "An exploratory study of Twitter metrics for measuring user influence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Haghighati & Kamran Sedig, 2020. "VARTTA: A Visual Analytics System for Making Sense of Real-Time Twitter Data," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Björkegren, Daniel & Karaca, Burak Ceyhun, 2022. "Network adoption subsidies: A digital evaluation of a rural mobile phone program in Rwanda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. María Laura Alzúa & Habiba Djebbari & Amy J. Pickering, 2020. "A Community-Based Program Promotes Sanitation," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 68(2), pages 357-390.
    5. Anni Arumsari Fitriany & Piotr J. Flatau & Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik & Nelly Florida Riama, 2021. "Assessment on the Use of Meteorological and Social Media Information for Forest Fire Detection and Prediction in Riau, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Guangyu Hu & Xueyan Han & Huixuan Zhou & Yuanli Liu, 2019. "Public Perception on Healthcare Services: Evidence from Social Media Platforms in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-10, April.
    7. Umar Ali Bukar & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rozi Nor Haizan Nor & Salfarina Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Mustafa Alabadla & Ali Alkhalifah, 2022. "How Advanced Technological Approaches Are Reshaping Sustainable Social Media Crisis Management and Communication: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Haenssgen, Marco J. & Charoenboon, Nutcha & Zanello, Giacomo, 2021. "You’ve got a friend in me: How social networks and mobile phones facilitate healthcare access among marginalised groups in rural Thailand and Lao PDR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Alekh Gour & Shikha Aggarwal & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Lending ears to unheard voices: An empirical analysis of user‐generated content on social media," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2457-2476, June.
    10. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Vanash M Patel, 2020. "Are papers addressing certain diseases perceived where these diseases are prevalent? The proposal to use Twitter data as social-spatial sensors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Muhammad Imran & Umair Qazi & Ferda Ofli, 2022. "TBCOV: Two Billion Multilingual COVID-19 Tweets with Sentiment, Entity, Geo, and Gender Labels," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Isaac Chun-Hai Fung & Jingjing Yin & Keisha D. Pressley & Carmen H. Duke & Chen Mo & Hai Liang & King-Wa Fu & Zion Tsz Ho Tse & Su-I Hou, 2019. "Pedagogical Demonstration of Twitter Data Analysis: A Case Study of World AIDS Day, 2014," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-12, June.
    13. Alex Chin & Dean Eckles & Johan Ugander, 2022. "Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1714-1736, March.
    14. Ramanadhan, Shoba & Nagler, Rebekah H. & McCloud, Rachel & Kohler, Racquel & Viswanath, Kasisomayajula, 2017. "Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks: A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 219-227.
    15. Nason Maani Hessari & May CI van Schalkwyk & Sian Thomas & Mark Petticrew, 2019. "Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Marcus Vinicius Santos & Fernando Morgado-Dias & Thiago C. Silva, 2023. "Oil Sector and Sentiment Analysis—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    17. Rosario Fernández-Peña & José Luis Molina & Oliver Valero, 2018. "Personal Network Analysis in the Study of Social Support: The Case of Chronic Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Sonja I. Garske & Suzanne Elayan & Martin Sykora & Tamar Edry & Linus B. Grabenhenrich & Sandro Galea & Sarah R. Lowe & Oliver Gruebner, 2021. "Space-Time Dependence of Emotions on Twitter after a Natural Disaster," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    19. Imane Semlali & Gilles Merminod & Orest Weber & Ana Terrier & Isabelle Decosterd & Eve Rubli Truchard & Pascal Singy, 2022. "Friendship in Later Life: How Friends Are Significant Resources in Older Persons’ Communication about Chronic Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Fang Fang & Yin Zhou & Shi Ying & Zhijuan Li, 2023. "A Study of the Ping An Health App Based on User Reviews with Sentiment Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6181-:d:570717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.