IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1351-d322726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of Formal and Informal Social Support With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Chinese Rural Elders

Author

Listed:
  • Shan Lu

    (School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Yupan Wu

    (School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Zongfu Mao

    (School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
    Global Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Xiaohui Liang

    (School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
    Global Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Objectives : To explore the association of formal and informal social support with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among Chinese rural elders and further investigate the influence of quantity and quality of social support on their HRQOL. Methods : The sample of 4189 Chinese rural elders over 60 years old was acquired from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The HRQOL was evaluated by EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The social support assessment was mainly based on the social support rating scale (SSRS), and Tobit regression analysis was used to explore the impact of social support on HRQOL. Results : The average EQ-5D index score (0 to 1) of the Chinese rural elders was 0.78 ± 0.16. Participants who were male or with better education were found to have higher scores. Those elders living alone, suffering from chronic diseases or disabled acquired lower scores. As for formal social support, higher medical or pension insurance and more social activities statistically significantly possessed higher scores. As for informal social support, higher number of offspring had a significant association with lower scores, while more contact with children and financial support from family were shown to be statistically significantly associated with higher scores after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. The quality of social support is more important than its quantity. An interesting finding was that the EQ-5D index scores did not support the Chinese traditional belief that ‘the more children, the more blessings’. Conclusions : The EQ-5D index scores of the rural elders in China is above the median level based on the scores of EQ-5D. Social support is significantly associated with elderly peoples’ quality of life. The results would be significant for accurately improving the life quality of Chinese rural elders from the perspective of social support.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan Lu & Yupan Wu & Zongfu Mao & Xiaohui Liang, 2020. "Association of Formal and Informal Social Support With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Chinese Rural Elders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1351-:d:322726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sónia F. Bernardes & Marta Matos & Liesbet Goubert, 2017. "Older adults’ preferences for formal social support of autonomy and dependence in pain: development and validation of a scale," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 257-268, September.
    2. Xiuqi Hao & Yuehan Yang & Xiaotong Gao & Tao Dai, 2019. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Health Management Program for the Elderly on Health-Related Quality of Life among Elderly People in China: Findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudina," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, January.
    3. Yang Cheng, Siyao Gao, Shuai Li, Yuchao Zhang and Mark Rosenberg, 2019. "Understanding the spatial disparities and vulnerability of population aging in China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201905, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    4. Aki Tsuchiya & Shunya Ikeda & Naoki Ikegami & Shuzo Nishimura & Ikuro Sakai & Takashi Fukuda & Chisato Hamashima & Akinori Hisashige & Makoto Tamura, 2002. "Estimating an EQ‐5D population value set: the case of Japan," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 341-353, June.
    5. Yang Cheng & Siyao Gao & Shuai Li & Yuchao Zhang & Mark Rosenberg, 2019. "Understanding the spatial disparities and vulnerability of population aging in China," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 73-89, January.
    6. Santini, Ziggi Ivan & Koyanagi, Ai & Tyrovolas, Stefanos & Haro, Josep M. & Fiori, Katherine L. & Uwakwa, Richard & Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran A. & Webber, Martin & Prince, Martin & Prina, A. Matthew, 2015. "Social network typologies and mortality risk among older people in China, India, and Latin America: A 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based cohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 134-143.
    7. Zachary Zimmer & Julia Kwong, 2003. "Family size and support of older adults in urban and rural China: Current effects and future implications," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 40(1), pages 23-44, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hexian Li & Mingli Pang & Jieru Wang & Jing Xu & Fanlei Kong, 2022. "Effects of Health Service Utilization and Informal Social Support on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress among the Internal Migrant Elderly following Children in Weifang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Daisheng Tang & Xinyuan Wang & Yahong Liu & Tao Bu, 2022. "The Impact of Informal Social Support on Older Health: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Isabelle Gansella Rocha Da Costa & Beatriz Helena Brugnaro & Camila Resende Gâmbaro Lima & Olaf Kraus de Camargo & Lais Fumincelli & Silvia Letícia Pavão & Nelci Adriana Cicuto Ferreira Rocha, 2023. "Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life of Children with and without Developmental Disabilities and Their Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Haoyi Guo & Steven Sek-yum Ngai, 2021. "Domestic Generative Acts and Life Satisfaction among Supplementary Grandparent Caregivers in Urban China: Mediated by Social Support and Moderated by Hukou Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Iswari Hariastuti & Muhammad Dawam & Sri Sugiharti & Tri Suratmi & Dwi Endah Kurniasih & Dwi Budiningsari & Wahyu Utomo & Muthmainnah Muthmainnah & Yuli Puspita Devi, 2024. "Elderly Golden Age School (EGAS): a strategy to promote health and prosperity elderly in Indonesia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Rana Dahlan & Babak Bohlouli & Humam Saltaji & Ida Kornerup & Bukola Salami & Maryam Amin, 2022. "Immigrant Parents’ Perceived Social Support and Their Children’s Oral Health Behaviors and Caries Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenjiang Song & Baoshu Wu & Yue Huang & Shubin Zhu & Lan Gao & Yi Li, 2022. "Effects of Household Resource Utilization Behaviors on Giant Panda Habitat under the Background of Aging: Evidence from Sichuan Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Liping Fu & Yuhui Wang & Lanping He, 2020. "Factors Associated with the Psychological Health of Caregiving Older Parents and Support from Their Grown Children: Results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Changyong Yang & Jianyuan Huang & Jiahao Yu, 2023. "Inequalities in Resource Distribution and Healthcare Service Utilization of Long-Term Care in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Hao Zhu, 2022. "Spatial Matching and Policy-Planning Evaluation of Urban Elderly Care Facilities Based on Multi-Agent Simulation: Evidence from Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Chengmin Zhou & Ting Huang & Xin Luo & Jake Kaner & Xiaoman Fu, 2022. "Recognition and Analysis of an Age-Friendly Intelligent Sofa Design Based on Skeletal Key-Points," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Xiaoran Huang & Pixin Gong & Marcus White, 2022. "Study on Spatial Distribution Equilibrium of Elderly Care Facilities in Downtown Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Yonghe Xiao & Jingxuan Li, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: A conversational analysis of aging in China from a cross-section of the labour market: a corpus-based study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Shenghua Zhou & S. Thomas Ng & Dezhi Li & Jiankun Zhang & Jie Fan & Yifan Yang, 2019. "Characterizing Stakeholders of Aging-in-Place through Social Network Analysis: A Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Jiajing Li & Yanran Huang & Stephen Nicholas & Jian Wang, 2019. "China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme’s Impact on the Medical Expenses of Elderly Rural Migrants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Shuo Ding, 2023. "Vulnerability to Poverty in Chinese Households with Elderly Members: 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Andrea Čajková & Peter Čajka, 2021. "Challenges and Sustainability of China’s Socio-Economic Stability in the Context of Its Demographic Development," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Samer A. Kharroubi & Yara Beyh & Marwa Diab El Harake & Dalia Dawoud & Donna Rowen & John Brazier, 2020. "Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Yatish Kumar & Priya Bhakat, 2022. "Social Capital in Old-Age and the Role of the Social Marginalisation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 371-388, August.
    14. Giles, John T. & Mu, Ren, 2006. "Elder Parent Health and the Migration Decision of Adult Children: Evidence from Rural China," IZA Discussion Papers 2333, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Hao-yu Hu & Wei Wang & Da-wei Feng & Hua-lei Yang & Zhong-kun Zhu, 2022. "Number of Children and Monetary Transfers to Elderly Parents in Rural China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 593-615, January.
    16. Akshaya Kumar Panigrahi, 2009. "Determinants of Living Arrangements of Elderly in Orissa: An Analysis," Working Papers 228, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    17. Hanrui Jia & Peng Zhan, 2021. "Intra‐family Income Redistribution and Its Dynamic Changes among the Elderly in China: 2002–2018," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(5), pages 84-104, September.
    18. Emma Aguila & Jung Ho Park & Alma Vega, 2020. "Living Arrangements and Supplemental Income Programs for Older Adults in Mexico," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(4), pages 1345-1368, August.
    19. Feng Xie & A. Pickard & Paul Krabbe & Dennis Revicki & Rosalie Viney & Nancy Devlin & David Feeny, 2015. "A Checklist for Reporting Valuation Studies of Multi-Attribute Utility-Based Instruments (CREATE)," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 867-877, August.
    20. Xi Chen, 2017. "Old age pension and intergenerational living arrangements: a regression discontinuity design," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 455-476, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1351-:d:322726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.