IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i3p965-d316375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Rehabilitation Health Policy, Systems, and Services Research Field: Quantitative Analyses of Publications over Time (1990–2017) and across Country Type

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago S. Jesus

    (Global Health and Tropical Medicine & WHO Collaborating Center on Health Workforce Policy and Planning, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine-NOVA University of Lisbon, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Helen Hoenig

    (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA
    Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

  • Michel D. Landry

    (School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
    Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

Abstract

Background: Health policy, systems and services research (HPSSR) is increasingly needed to enable better access to, and value of, rehabilitation services worldwide. We aim to quantify the growth of Rehabilitation HPSSR publications since 1990, compared to that of overall rehabilitation research and overall HPSSR. Methods: Quantitative, comparative analysis of publication trends using the PubMed database and its indexation system. Comprehensive search filters, based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), were built and calibrated to locate research articles with content on HPSSR and rehabilitation of physical impairments. Additional filters were used for locating research publications declaring funding support, publications in rehabilitation journals, and finally publications focused on high-income (HICs) or low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The same approach was used for retrieving data on comparator fields—overall HPSSR and overall rehabilitation research. Linear regressions, with ANOVA, were used for analyzing yearly publication growths over the 28-year time frame. Results: Rehabilitation HPSSR publications in PubMed have grown significantly from 1990 to 2017 in the percentage of all rehabilitation research (from 11% to 18%) and all HPSSR (from 2.8% to 3.9%; both p < 0.001). The rate of Rehabilitation HPSSR published in rehabilitation journals did not change significantly over time ( p = 0.47). The rates of publications with declared funding support increased significantly, but such growth did not differ significantly from that of the comparator fields. Finally, LMICs accounted for 9.3% of the country-focused rehabilitation HPSSR since 1990, but this percentage value increased significantly ( p < 0.001) from 6% in 1990 to 13% in 2017. Conclusion: Rehabilitation HPSSR publications, i.e., those indexed in PubMed with related MeSH terms, have grown in both absolute and relative values. Rehabilitation HPSSR publications focused on LMICs also grew significantly since 1990, but still remained a tiny portion of the Rehabilitation HPSSR publications with country-specific MeSH terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago S. Jesus & Helen Hoenig & Michel D. Landry, 2020. "Development of the Rehabilitation Health Policy, Systems, and Services Research Field: Quantitative Analyses of Publications over Time (1990–2017) and across Country Type," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:965-:d:316375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilda Bastian & Paul Glasziou & Iain Chalmers, 2010. "Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Malcolm MacLachlan & Joanne McVeigh & Michael Cooke & Delia Ferri & Catherine Holloway & Victoria Austin & Dena Javadi, 2018. "Intersections Between Systems Thinking and Market Shaping for Assistive Technology: The SMART (Systems-Market for Assistive and Related Technologies) Thinking Matrix," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Bui The Hung & Nguyen Phuoc Long & Le Phi Hung & Nguyen Thien Luan & Nguyen Hoang Anh & Tran Diem Nghi & Mai Van Hieu & Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang & Herizo Fabien Rafidinarivo & Nguyen Ky Anh & David Hawk, 2015. "Research Trends in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of More than 50 Years of Publication Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Taghreed Adam & Saad Ahmad & Maryam Bigdeli & Abdul Ghaffar & John-Arne Røttingen, 2011. "Trends in Health Policy and Systems Research over the Past Decade: Still Too Little Capacity in Low-Income Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-10, November.
    5. Tess Bright & Sarah Wallace & Hannah Kuper, 2018. "A Systematic Review of Access to Rehabilitation for People with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-34, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boya Nugraha & Klejda Tani & Christoph Gutenbrunner, 2020. "Rehabilitation Service Assessment and Workforce Capacity Building in Albania—A Civil Society Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grisel Zacca-González & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, 2018. "Medical scientific output and specialization in Latin American countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1635-1650, June.
    2. Dreesens, Dunja & Kremer, Leontien & Burgers, Jako & van der Weijden, Trudy, 2020. "Lost in definitions: Reducing duplication and clarifying definitions of knowledge and decision support tools. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 531-539.
    3. Victoria Austin & Catherine Holloway, 2022. "Assistive Technology (AT), for What?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Qhayiya Magaqa & Proochista Ariana & Sarah Polack, 2021. "Examining the Availability and Accessibility of Rehabilitation Services in a Rural District of South Africa: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Blake M. Louscher & Veerasathpurush Allareddy & Satheesh Elangovan, 2019. "Predictors of Citations of Systematic Reviews in Oral Implantology: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    6. Cornelia Anne Barth & Maggie Donovan-Hall & Catherine Blake & Noor Jahan Akhtar & Joseph Martial Capo-Chichi & Cliona O’Sullivan, 2021. "A Focus Group Study to Understand the Perspectives of Physiotherapists on Barriers and Facilitators to Advancing Rehabilitation in Low-Resource and Conflict Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Mark J Bolland & Andrew Grey, 2014. "A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Natasha Layton & Daniel Mont & Louise Puli & Irene Calvo & Kylie Shae & Emma Tebbutt & Keith D. Hill & Libby Callaway & Diana Hiscock & Abner Manlapaz & Inge Groenewegen & Mahpekai Sidiqi, 2021. "Access to Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Voices of Users and Families," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Shi, Xuanyu & Du, Jian, 2022. "Distinguishing transformative from incremental clinical evidence: A classifier of clinical research using textual features from abstracts and citing sentences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    11. Natasha Layton & Johan Borg, 2023. "Assistive Technology and the Wellbeing of Societies from a Capabilities Approach," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-3, January.
    12. Jane Wilbur & Tess Bright & Thérèse Mahon & Shaffa Hameed & Belen Torondel & Wakisa Mulwafu & Hannah Kuper & Sarah Polack, 2018. "Developing Behaviour Change Interventions for Improving Access to Health and Hygiene for People with Disabilities: Two Case Studies from Nepal and Malawi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Tiago S. Jesus & Michel D. Landry & Helen Hoenig, 2019. "Global Need for Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Mohamed I. Maalim & Malcolm MacLachlan, 2022. "The Assistive Technology Passport: A Resource for Enhancing Capabilities as a Result of Better Access to Assistive Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Xanthe Hunt & Melissa Bradshaw & Steyn Lodewyk Vogel & Alberto Vasquez Encalada & Shanice Eksteen & Marguerite Schneider & Kelly Chunga & Leslie Swartz, 2022. "Community Support for Persons with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Jason Portenoy & Jevin D. West, 2020. "Constructing and evaluating automated literature review systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 3233-3251, December.
    17. Marja Eliisa Holm & Päivi Sainio & Jaana Suvisaari & Katri Sääksjärvi & Tuija Jääskeläinen & Suvi Parikka & Seppo Koskinen, 2022. "Differences in Unfavorable Lifestyle Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic between People with and without Disabilities in Finland: Psychological Distress as a Mediator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Dreesens, Dunja & Kremer, Leontien & van der Weijden, Trudy, 2019. "The Dutch chaos case: A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1288-1297.
    19. Joerg J Meerpohl & Florian Herrle & Gerd Antes & Erik von Elm, 2012. "Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-5, May.
    20. Yaroslava Robles-Bykbaev & Christian Oyola-Flores & Vladimir Espartaco Robles-Bykbaev & Martín López-Nores & Paola Ingavélez-Guerra & José Juan Pazos-Arias & Fernando Pesántez-Avilés & Manuel Ramos-Ca, 2019. "A Bespoke Social Network for Deaf Women in Ecuador to Access Information on Sexual and Reproductive Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:965-:d:316375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.