IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i24p9246-d459922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How is Respect and Social Inclusion Conceptualised by Older Adults in an Aspiring Age-Friendly City? A Photovoice Study in the North-West of England

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Ronzi

    (Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
    Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3DT, UK)

  • Lois Orton

    (Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3DT, UK
    Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK)

  • Stefanie Buckner

    (Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK)

  • Nigel Bruce

    (Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3DT, UK)

  • Daniel Pope

    (Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3DT, UK)

Abstract

The World Health Organisation (WHO) Global Age-Friendly Cities (AFC) Guide classifies key characteristics of an AFC according to eight domains. Whilst much age-friendly practice and research have focused on domains of the physical environment, those related to the social environment have received less attention. Using a Photovoice methodology within a Community-Based Participatory Research approach, our study draws on photographs, interviews and focus groups among 26 older Liverpool residents (60+ years) to explore how the city promotes respect and social inclusion (a core WHO AFC domain). Being involved in this photovoice study allowed older adults across four contrasting neighbourhoods to communicate their perspectives directly to Liverpool’s policymakers, service providers and third sector organisations. This paper provides novel insights into how: (i) respect and social inclusion are shaped by aspects of both physical and social environment, and (ii) the accessibility, affordability and sociability of physical spaces and wider social processes (e.g., neighbourhood fragmentation) contributed to or hindered participants’ health, wellbeing, intergenerational relationships and feelings of inclusion and connection. Our findings suggest that respect and social inclusion are relevant across all eight domains of the WHO AFC Guide. It is core to an AFC and should be reflected in both city-based policies and evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Ronzi & Lois Orton & Stefanie Buckner & Nigel Bruce & Daniel Pope, 2020. "How is Respect and Social Inclusion Conceptualised by Older Adults in an Aspiring Age-Friendly City? A Photovoice Study in the North-West of England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9246-:d:459922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hallgrimsdottir, Berglind & Svensson, Helena & Ståhl, Agneta, 2015. "Long term effects of an intervention in the outdoor environment—a comparison of older people’s perception in two residential areas, in one of which accessibility improvements were introduced," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 90-97.
    2. Israel, B.A. & Coombe, C.M. & Cheezum, R.R. & Schulz, A.J. & McGranaghan, R.J. & Lichtenstein, R. & Reyes, A.G. & Clement, J. & Burris, A., 2010. "Community-based participatory research: A capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(11), pages 2094-2102.
    3. Plane, Jocelyn & Klodawsky, Fran, 2013. "Neighbourhood amenities and health: Examining the significance of a local park," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Belon, Ana Paula & Nieuwendyk, Laura M. & Vallianatos, Helen & Nykiforuk, Candace I.J., 2014. "How community environment shapes physical activity: Perceptions revealed through the PhotoVoice method," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 10-21.
    5. Prattley, Jennifer & Buffel, Tine & Marshall, Alan & Nazroo, James, 2020. "Area effects on the level and development of social exclusion in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Yu-Hsien Tseng & Yu-Ling Li & Shyuemeng Luu & Dih-Ling Luh, 2022. "Respect in the Eyes of Non-Urban Elders: Using Qualitative Interviews to Distinguish Community Elders’ Perspective of Respect in General and Healthcare Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Moogoor, Adithi & Močnik, Špela & Yuen, Belinda, 2022. "Neighbourhood environmental influences on older adults’ physical activities and social participation in Singapore: A photovoice study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Díez & Pedro Gullón & María Sandín Vázquez & Belén Álvarez & María Del Prado Martín & María Urtasun & Maite Gamarra & Joel Gittelsohn & Manuel Franco, 2018. "A Community-Driven Approach to Generate Urban Policy Recommendations for Obesity Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Tomasz Panek & Jan Zwierzchowski, 2022. "Examining the Degree of Social Exclusion Risk of the Population Aged 50 + in the EU Countries Under the Capability Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 973-1002, October.
    3. Brent Hammer & Helen Vallianatos & Candace Nykiforuk & Laura Nieuwendyk, 2015. "Perceptions of healthy eating in four Alberta communities: a photovoice project," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 649-662, December.
    4. Lisa M. Vaughn & MaryAnn Lohmueller, 2014. "Calling All Stakeholders," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 336-355, August.
    5. Grazia Salvo & Bonnie M. Lashewicz & Patricia K. Doyle-Baker & Gavin R. McCormack, 2018. "Neighbourhood Built Environment Influences on Physical Activity among Adults: A Systematized Review of Qualitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Brubacher, Laura Jane & Dewey, Cate E. & Cunsolo, Ashlee & Humphries, Sally & Healey Akearok, Gwen K. & Gong, Crystal & Harper, Sherilee L., 2020. "Mapping the maternal health research landscape in Nunavut: A systematic search & critical review of methodology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Hanna Weimann & Jonas Björk & Carita Håkansson, 2019. "Experiences of the Urban Green Local Environment as a Factor for Well-Being among Adults: An Exploratory Qualitative Study in Southern Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Lily F. Roberts & Olivia Lounsbury & Veronica Awuzudike & Neil Jennings & Emma L. Lawrance, 2022. "Healthy Environments: Understanding Perceptions of Underrepresented Communities in the United Kingdom," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Judith Langfermann, 2024. "How Citizen Entrepreneurship Works," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 10(2), pages 327-334, July.
    10. Hallgrimsdottir, Berglind & Wennberg, Hanna & Svensson, Helena & Ståhl, Agneta, 2016. "Implementation of accessibility policy in municipal transport planning – Progression and regression in Sweden between 2004 and 2014," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 196-205.
    11. Christopher Phillipson & Sophie Yarker & Luciana Lang & Patty Doran & Mhorag Goff & Tine Buffel, 2021. "COVID-19, Inequality and Older People: Developing Community-Centred Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Nasibu Mramba, 2022. "Moving towards the social inclusion for street vendors in Tanzania: Current situation and perspectives," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 296-305, March.
    13. Marj Plumb & Senaida Fernandez Poole & Heather Sarantis & Susan Braun & Janna Cordeiro & Juliana Van Olphen & Marion Kavanaugh-Lynch, 2019. "Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Jessica Alejandra Ruiz-Ramírez & Yury Arenis Olarte-Arias & Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales, 2021. "Educational Processes for Health and Disease Self-Management in Public Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. West, Joseph F., 2014. "Public health program planning logic model for community engaged Type 2 diabetes management and prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 43-49.
    16. Niamh Smith & Ronan Foley & Michail Georgiou & Zoë Tieges & Sebastien Chastin, 2022. "Urban Blue Spaces as Therapeutic Landscapes: “A Slice of Nature in the City”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Clifton Addison & Brenda W. Campbell Jenkins & Monique White & Darcel Thigpen Odom & Marty Fortenberry & Gregory Wilson & Pamela McCoy & Lavon Young & Clevette Woodberry & Kathryn Herron & Jermal Clar, 2021. "Twenty Years of Leading the Way among Cohort Studies in Community-Driven Outreach and Engagement: Jackson State University/Jackson Heart Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Rachel Prowse & Kate Storey & Dana Lee Olstad & Valerie Carson & Kim D. Raine, 2022. "Choice, Motives, and Mixed Messages: A Qualitative Photo-Based Inquiry of Parents’ Perceptions of Food and Beverage Marketing to Children in Sport and Recreation Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Emond, Tina & Guillaumie, Laurence & de Montigny, Francine, 2021. "Using a logic model to develop an intervention for improving miscarriage care in the emergency department," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Eli Paddle & Jason Gilliland, 2016. "Orange Is the New Green: Exploring the Restorative Capacity of Seasonal Foliage in Schoolyard Trees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9246-:d:459922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.