IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8883-d453351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Spatial Modelling Approaches on PM 10 and NO 2 Concentration Variations: A Case Study in Surabaya City, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Liadira Kusuma Widya

    (Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
    Department of Geomatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya City 60111, Indonesia)

  • Chin-Yu Hsu

    (Department of Safety, Health, and Environmental Engineering, Ming Chih University of Technology, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan)

  • Hsiao-Yun Lee

    (Department of Leisure Industry and Health Promotion, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City 112303, Taiwan)

  • Lalu Muhamad Jaelani

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya City 60111, Indonesia)

  • Shih-Chun Candice Lung

    (Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei City 11529, Taiwan
    Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 10617, Taiwan
    Institute of Environmental Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 100025, Taiwan)

  • Huey-Jen Su

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Da Wu

    (Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County 35053, Taiwan)

Abstract

Because of fast-paced industrialization, urbanization, and population growth in Indonesia, there are serious health issues in the country resulting from air pollution. This study uses geospatial modelling technologies, namely land-use regression (LUR), geographically weighted regression (GWR), and geographic and temporal weighted regression (GTWR) models, to assess variations in particulate matter (PM 10 ) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) concentrations in Surabaya City, Indonesia. This is the first study to implement spatiotemporal variability of air pollution concentrations in Surabaya City, Indonesia. To develop the prediction models, air pollution data collected from seven monitoring stations from 2010 to 2018 were used as dependent variables, while land-use/land cover allocations within a 250 m to 5000 m circular buffer range surrounding the monitoring stations were collected as independent variables. A supervised stepwise variable selection procedure was applied to identify the important predictor variables for developing the LUR, GWR, and GTWR models. The developed models of LUR, GWR, and GTWR accounted for 49%, 50%, and 51% of PM 10 variations and 46%, 47%, and 48% of NO 2 variations, respectively. The GTWR model performed better (R 2 = 0.51 for PM 10 and 0.48 for NO 2 ) than the other two models (R 2 = 0.49–0.50 for PM 10 and 0.46–0.47 for NO 2 ), LUR and GWR. In the PM 10 model four predictor variables, public facility, industry and warehousing, paddy field, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), were selected during the variable selection procedure. Meanwhile, paddy field, residential area, rainfall, and temperature played important roles in explaining NO 2 variations. Because of biomass burning issues in South Asia, the paddy field, which has a positive correlation with PM 10 and NO 2 , was selected as a predictor. By using long-term monitoring data to establish prediction models, this model may better depict PM 10 and NO 2 concentration variations within areas across Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Liadira Kusuma Widya & Chin-Yu Hsu & Hsiao-Yun Lee & Lalu Muhamad Jaelani & Shih-Chun Candice Lung & Huey-Jen Su & Chih-Da Wu, 2020. "Comparison of Spatial Modelling Approaches on PM 10 and NO 2 Concentration Variations: A Case Study in Surabaya City, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8883-:d:453351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8883/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8883/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin-Yu Hsu & Yu-Ting Zeng & Yu-Cheng Chen & Mu-Jean Chen & Shih-Chun Candice Lung & Chih-Da Wu, 2020. "Kriging-Based Land-Use Regression Models That Use Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate the Monthly BTEX Concentration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Pier Mannuccio Mannucci & Massimo Franchini, 2017. "Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution in Developing Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-8, September.
    3. Seung-Hoon Park & Dong-Won Ko, 2018. "Investigating the Effects of the Built Environment on PM 2.5 and PM 10 : A Case Study of Seoul Metropolitan City, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Piers MacNaughton & Erika Eitland & Itai Kloog & Joel Schwartz & Joseph Allen, 2017. "Impact of Particulate Matter Exposure and Surrounding “Greenness” on Chronic Absenteeism in Massachusetts Public Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Hsiao-Lan Liu & Yu-Sheng Shen, 2014. "The Impact of Green Space Changes on Air Pollution and Microclimates: A Case Study of the Taipei Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-29, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Shi & Alexis Kai-Hon Lau & Edward Ng & Hung-Chak Ho & Muhammad Bilal, 2021. "A Multiscale Land Use Regression Approach for Estimating Intraurban Spatial Variability of PM 2.5 Concentration by Integrating Multisource Datasets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Widya Liadira Kusuma & Wu Chih-Da & Zeng Yu-Ting & Handayani Hepi Hapsari & Jaelani Lalu Muhamad, 2019. "PM 2.5 Pollutant in Asia—A Comparison of Metropolis Cities in Indonesia and Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Junga Lee & Christopher D. Ellis & Yun Eui Choi & Soojin You & Jinhyung Chon, 2015. "An Integrated Approach to Mitigation Wetland Site Selection: A Case Study in Gwacheon, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Balasooriya, Namal N. & Bandara, Jayatilleke S. & Rohde, Nicholas, 2022. "Air pollution and health outcomes: Evidence from Black Saturday Bushfires in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    4. Jelonia T. Rumph & Victoria R. Stephens & Joanie L. Martin & LaKendria K. Brown & Portia L. Thomas & Ayorinde Cooley & Kevin G. Osteen & Kaylon L. Bruner-Tran, 2022. "Uncovering Evidence: Associations between Environmental Contaminants and Disparities in Women’s Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Qin Song & Yu-Jun Zheng & Jun Yang, 2019. "Effects of Food Contamination on Gastrointestinal Morbidity: Comparison of Different Machine-Learning Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Karl Kilbo Edlund & Felicia Killman & Peter Molnár & Johan Boman & Leo Stockfelt & Janine Wichmann, 2021. "Health Risk Assessment of PM 2.5 and PM 2.5 -Bound Trace Elements in Thohoyandou, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Chaonan Hu & Nana Luo & Chao Cai & Yarui Cui & Hongtao Gao & Xing Yan, 2024. "Meso-Scale Impacts of the Urban Structure Metrics on PM2.5 in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Jong In Baek & Yong Un Ban, 2020. "The Impacts of Urban Air Pollution Emission Density on Air Pollutant Concentration Based on a Panel Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Milena Vuckovic & Kristina Kiesel & Ardeshir Mahdavi, 2017. "The Extent and Implications of the Microclimatic Conditions in the Urban Environment: A Vienna Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Qingyong Wang & Hong-Ning Dai & Hao Wang, 2017. "A Smart MCDM Framework to Evaluate the Impact of Air Pollution on City Sustainability: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Joanna Wysmułek & Maria Hełdak & Anatolii Kucher, 2020. "The Analysis of Green Areas’ Accessibility in Comparison with Statistical Data in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Chaiwat Bumroongkit & Chalerm Liwsrisakun & Athavudh Deesomchok & Chaicharn Pothirat & Theerakorn Theerakittikul & Atikun Limsukon & Konlawij Trongtrakul & Pattraporn Tajarernmuang & Nutchanok Niyatiw, 2022. "Correlation of Air Pollution and Prevalence of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Northern Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    13. Mona Elbarbary & Trenton Honda & Geoffrey Morgan & Yuming Guo & Yanfei Guo & Paul Kowal & Joel Negin, 2020. "Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Association with Anaemia Prevalence and Haemoglobin Levels in Chinese Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Chia-An Ku, 2020. "Exploring the Spatial and Temporal Relationship between Air Quality and Urban Land-Use Patterns Based on an Integrated Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Eunha Shin & Heungsoon Kim, 2019. "Benefit–Cost Analysis of Green Roof Initiative Projects: The Case of Jung-gu, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Khuc, Quy Van & Nong, Duy & Phu Vu, Tri, 2022. "To pay or not to pay that is the question - for air pollution mitigation in a world’s dynamic city: An experiment in Hanoi, Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 687-701.
    17. Hansen Li & Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Angel M. Dzhambov & Guodong Zhang & Yang Cao, 2022. "Green Space for Mental Health in the COVID-19 Era: A Pathway Analysis in Residential Green Space Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Corina Popitanu & Gabriela Cioca & Lucian Copolovici & Dennis Iosif & Florentina-Daniela Munteanu & Dana Copolovici, 2021. "The Seasonality Impact of the BTEX Pollution on the Atmosphere of Arad City, Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, May.
    19. Nihit Goyal & David Canning, 2017. "Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Air Pollution in Utero as a Risk Factor for Child Stunting in Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Yuliang Jiang & Yufeng Yang, 2022. "Environmental Justice in Greater Los Angeles: Impacts of Spatial and Ethnic Factors on Residents’ Socioeconomic and Health Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8883-:d:453351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.