IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8814-d452201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motility in Frail Older Adults: Operationalization of a New Framework and First Insights into Its Relationship with Physical Activity and Life-Space Mobility: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Seinsche

    (Institute of Movement & Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

  • Wiebren Zijlstra

    (Institute of Movement & Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

  • Eleftheria Giannouli

    (Institute of Movement & Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

In order to design effective interventions to prevent age-related mobility loss, it is important to identify influencing factors. The concept of “motility” by Kaufmann et al. subdivides such factors into three categories: “access”, “skills”, and “appropriation”. The aim of this study was to assemble appropriate quantitative assessment tools for the assessment of these factors in frail older adults and to get first insights into their relative contribution for life-space and physical activity-related mobility. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study conducted with twenty-eight at least prefrail, retired participants aged 61–94. Life-space mobility was assessed using the “University of Alabama at Birmingham Life-space Assessment” (LSA) and physical activity using the “German Physical Activity Questionnaire” (PAQ50+). Factors from the category “appropriation”, followed by factors from the category “skills” showed the strongest associations with the LSA. Factors from the category “access” best explained the variance for PAQ50+. This study’s findings indicate the importance of accounting for and examining comprehensive models of mobility. The proposed assessment tools need to be explored in more depth in longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes in order to yield more conclusive results about the appropriateness of the motility concept for such purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Seinsche & Wiebren Zijlstra & Eleftheria Giannouli, 2020. "Motility in Frail Older Adults: Operationalization of a New Framework and First Insights into Its Relationship with Physical Activity and Life-Space Mobility: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8814-:d:452201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8814/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8814/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Metz, D. H., 2000. "Mobility of older people and their quality of life," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 149-152, April.
    2. Rob C van Lummel & Stefan Walgaard & Mirjam Pijnappels & Petra J M Elders & Judith Garcia-Aymerich & Jaap H van Dieën & Peter J Beek, 2015. "Physical Performance and Physical Activity in Older Adults: Associated but Separate Domains of Physical Function in Old Age," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Timothée Cuignet & Camille Perchoux & Geoffrey Caruso & Olivier Klein & Sylvain Klein & Basile Chaix & Yan Kestens & Philippe Gerber, 2020. "Mobility among older adults: Deconstructing the effects of motility and movement on wellbeing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 383-401, February.
    4. Birthe Jongeneel-Grimen & Wim Busschers & Mariël Droomers & Hans A M van Oers & Karien Stronks & Anton E Kunst, 2013. "Change in Neighborhood Traffic Safety: Does It Matter in Terms of Physical Activity?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Eleftheria Giannouli & Otmar Bock & Wiebren Zijlstra, 2018. "Cognitive functioning is more closely related to real-life mobility than to laboratory-based mobility parameters," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 57-65, March.
    6. Michelle Takemoto & Jordan A. Carlson & Kevin Moran & Suneeta Godbole & Katie Crist & Jacqueline Kerr, 2015. "Relationship between Objectively Measured Transportation Behaviors and Health Characteristics in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Vanessa Stjernborg & Anders Wretstrand & Mekonnen Tesfahuney, 2015. "Everyday Life Mobilities of Older Persons - A Case Study of Ageing in a Suburban Landscape in Sweden," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 383-401, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klaus Hauer & Phoebe Ullrich & Patrick Heldmann & Laura Bauknecht & Saskia Hummel & Bastian Abel & Juergen M. Bauer & Sarah E. Lamb & Christian Werner, 2021. "Psychometric Properties of the Proxy-Reported Life-Space Assessment in Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS-Proxy) for Older Persons with and without Cognitive Impairment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Borowska-Stefańska & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Michał Kowalski & Filip Turoboś & Szymon Wiśniewski, 2023. "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Daily Mobility of the Elderly Living in Small Cities in Lodz Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Nur Hasna Che Had & Khadijah Alavi & Noremy Md Akhir & Irina Riyanti Muhammad Nur & Muhammad Shakir Zufayri Shuhaimi & Hui Foh Foong, 2023. "A Scoping Review of the Factor Associated with Older Adults’ Mobility Barriers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff & Saidatulakmal Mohd, 2023. "Transport, Mobility and the Wellbeing of Older Adults: An Exploration of Private Chauffeuring and Companionship Services in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Mitra, Suman & Yao, Mingqi & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2021. "Gender differences in elderly mobility in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 203-226.
    5. Rania Wasfi & Ahmed El-Geneidy & David Levinson, 2007. "The Transportation Needs of Seniors," Working Papers 000028, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    6. Vanessa Zorrilla-Muñoz & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás & Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez & Alba Ayala & Gloria Fernandez-Mayoralas & Maria João Forjaz, 2022. "Ageing Perception as a Key Predictor of Self-Rated Health by Rural Older People—A Study with Gender and Inclusive Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Ranković Plazinić, Biljana & Jović, Jadranka, 2018. "Mobility and transport potential of elderly in differently accessible rural areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 169-180.
    8. Yang, Yongjiang & Sasaki, Kuniaki & Cheng, Long & Tao, Sui, 2022. "Does the built environment matter for active travel among older adults: Insights from Chiba City, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Du, Yao & Sun, Guibo & Heinen, Eva, 2024. "Does subjective wellbeing modify travel behaviour changes among older people in response to a new metro line?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Biranchi Adhikari & Ajay Kumar Behera & Rabindra Narayan Mahapatra & Harish Chandra Das, 2022. "Retracted: An empirical model for Indian senior citizens in traffic management," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 35-56, March.
    12. Wong, R.C.P. & Szeto, W.Y. & Yang, Linchuan & Li, Y.C. & Wong, S.C., 2018. "Public transport policy measures for improving elderly mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 73-79.
    13. Olawole, Moses Olaniran & Aloba, Oluwole, 2014. "Mobility characteristics of the elderly and their associated level of satisfaction with transport services in Osogbo, Southwestern Nigeria," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 105-116.
    14. Wong, R.C.P. & Yang, Linchuan & Szeto, W.Y. & Li, Y.C. & Wong, S.C., 2020. "The effects of accessible taxi service and taxi fare subsidy scheme on the elderly's willingness-to-travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 129-136.
    15. Banister, David & Bowling, Ann, 2004. "Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 105-115, April.
    16. Rosenkvist, Jenny & Risser, Ralf & Iwarsson, Susanne & Wendel, Kerstin & Ståhl, Agneta, 2009. "The Challenge of Using Public Transport: Descriptions by People with Cognitive Functional Limitations," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(1), pages 65-80.
    17. Fillekes, Michelle Pasquale & Röcke, Christina & Katana, Marko & Weibel, Robert, 2019. "Self-reported versus GPS-derived indicators of daily mobility in a sample of healthy older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 193-202.
    18. Su, Fengming & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Bell, Michael G.H., 2009. "Mode Choice of Older People Before and After Shopping: A Study with London Data," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 2(1), pages 29-46.
    19. Martens, Karel, 2018. "Ageing, impairments and travel: Priority setting for an inclusive transport system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 122-130.
    20. Yen Tran & Naohisa Hashimoto & Takafumi Ando & Toshihisa Sato & Naoki Konishi & Yuji Takeda & Motoyuki Akamatsu, 2024. "The indirect effect of travel mode use on subjective well-being through out-of-home activities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2359-2391, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8814-:d:452201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.