IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8611-d447845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Healthy Checkout Counters Improve Food Purchases? Two Real-Life Experiments in Dutch Supermarkets

Author

Listed:
  • Marlijn Huitink

    (Department of Health Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Maartje P. Poelman

    (Chair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Jacob C. Seidell

    (Department of Health Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Lothar D. J. Kuijper

    (Department of Health Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Trynke Hoekstsra

    (Department of Health Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Coosje Dijkstra

    (Department of Health Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Most snacks displayed at supermarket checkouts do not contribute to a healthy diet. We investigated the effects of introducing healthier snack alternatives at checkouts in supermarkets on purchasing behavior. In Study 1, we investigated the effect of completely substituting less healthy with healthier snacks (one supermarket). In Study 2, we investigated the effect of placing and discounting healthier snacks while the less healthy snacks remain in place (two supermarkets). In both studies, the number of purchased snacks (per 1000 customers) was used as the outcome variable. Results for Study 1 showed that the absolute number of purchased checkout snacks was 2.4 times lower (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9–2.7) when healthier snacks instead of less healthy snacks were placed at the supermarket checkouts. Results for Study 2 showed that when additional healthier snacks were placed near the checkouts, the absolute number of healthier purchased snacks increased by a factor of 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3–3.3). When additional healthier snacks were placed near the checkouts and discounted, the absolute number of healthier purchased snacks increased by a factor of 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0–3.6), although this was not statistically significant higher than placement only (ratio: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.7–1.9). Purchases of less healthy snacks did not decline, and even slightly increased, during the intervention period (ratio: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1–1.5). If supermarkets want to promote healthier snack purchases, additional healthier products can be positioned near the checkouts. However, this does not discourages the purchase of less healthy snacks. Therefore, to discourage unhealthy snack purchases at supermarket checkouts, a total substitution of less healthy snacks with healthier alternatives is most effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Marlijn Huitink & Maartje P. Poelman & Jacob C. Seidell & Lothar D. J. Kuijper & Trynke Hoekstsra & Coosje Dijkstra, 2020. "Can Healthy Checkout Counters Improve Food Purchases? Two Real-Life Experiments in Dutch Supermarkets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8611-:d:447845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Payne, Collin & Niculescu, Mihai, 2018. "Can healthy checkout end-caps improve targeted fruit and vegetable purchases? Evidence from grocery and SNAP participant purchases," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 318-323.
    2. Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer & Markus Blut & Sarah Hong Xiao & Dhruv Grewal, 2020. "Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 384-404, May.
    3. repec:bla:devpol:v:26:y:2008:i:6:p:657-692 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Katrine T Ejlerskov & Stephen J Sharp & Martine Stead & Ashley J Adamson & Martin White & Jean Adams, 2018. "Supermarket policies on less-healthy food at checkouts: Natural experimental evaluation using interrupted time series analyses of purchases," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stancu, Violeta & Lähteenmäki, Liisa, 2022. "Consumer-related antecedents of food provisioning behaviors that promote food waste," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shahzad, Mohsin & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Shahzad, Khuram, 2023. "Forecasting impulsive consumers driven by macro-influencers posts: Intervention of followers' flow state and perceived informativeness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Xiyun Gong & Choy Leong Yee & Shin Yiing Lee & Ethan Yi Cao & Abu Naser Mohammad Saif, 2024. "Knowledge mapping of impulsive buying behavior research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Markus Blut & Cheng Wang & Nancy V. Wünderlich & Christian Brock, 2021. "Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 632-658, July.
    5. Parsad, Chandan & Prashar, Sanjeev & Vijay, T. Sai & Kumar, Mukesh, 2021. "Do promotion and prevention focus influence impulse buying: The role of mood regulation, shopping values, and impulse buying tendency," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Henry Wolgast & McKenna M. Halverson & Nicole Kennedy & Isabel Gallard & Allison Karpyn, 2022. "Encouraging Healthier Food and Beverage Purchasing and Consumption: A Review of Interventions within Grocery Retail Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Adriana Manolica & Ioana-Tatiana Topciu & Teodora Roman, 2021. "Values, Attitudes and Lifestyles Based Typologies as Predictors for Consumer Impulsiveness," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 582-591, August.
    8. Makaiko G. Khonje & Matin Qaim, 2019. "Modernization of African Food Retailing and (Un)healthy Food Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Heny Hendrayati, 2024. "Enhancing Women Entrepreneurs' Competitiveness in the Livestreaming Age," GATR Journals jber251, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    10. Katakam, Bharath Shashanka & Bhukya, Ramulu & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar & Samala, Nagaraj, 2021. "Longitudinal analysis versus cross-sectional analysis in assessing the factors influencing shoppers’ impulse purchase behavior – Do the store ambience and salesperson interactions really matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Elhajjar, Samer, 2023. "Factors influencing buying behavior of Lebanese consumers towards fashion brands during economic crisis: A qualitative study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Shuyang Wang & Yun Liu & Yingying Du & Xingyuan Wang, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Consumers’ Impulse Buying: The Moderating Role of Moderate Thinking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Rouven Seifert & Cord Otten & Michel Clement & Sönke Albers & Ole Kleinen, 2023. "Exclusivity strategies for digital products across digital and physical markets," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 245-265, March.
    14. Mingwei Li & Qingjin Wang & Ying Cao, 2022. "Understanding Consumer Online Impulse Buying in Live Streaming E-Commerce: A Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Chen, Xiao & Guo, Gangxing, 2024. "Air pollution and online lender behavior: Evidence from Chinese peer-to-peer lending," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    16. Chunhui Huo & Xiaorui Wang & Muhammad Waqas Sadiq & Ming Pang, 2023. "Exploring Factors Affecting Consumer’s Impulse Buying Behavior in Live-Streaming Shopping: An Interactive Research Based Upon SOR Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    17. Islam, Tahir & Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Arya, Vikas & Wang, Ying & Akhtar, Naeem & Mubarik, Shujaat & Xiaobei, Liang, 2021. "Panic buying in the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country examination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Katarina Sokic & Darija Korkut & Aljosa Sestanovic, 2020. "Relationship between Impulsivity, Value Orientations and Impulsive Buying," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 18(3 (Fall)), pages 195-210.
    19. James P. Reynolds & Milica Vasiljevic & Mark Pilling & Marissa G. Hall & Kurt M. Ribisl & Theresa M. Marteau, 2020. "Communicating Evidence about the Causes of Obesity and Support for Obesity Policies: Two Population-Based Survey Experiments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Allison Karpyn & Kathleen McCallops & Henry Wolgast & Karen Glanz, 2020. "Improving Consumption and Purchases of Healthier Foods in Retail Environments: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8611-:d:447845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.