IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8370-d443821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Analysis of the Social Environment Relative to Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in CrossFit Gyms

Author

Listed:
  • Megan S. Patterson

    (College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA)

  • Katie M. Heinrich

    (College of Health and Human Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Tyler Prochnow

    (Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA)

  • Taylor Graves-Boswell

    (College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA)

  • Mandy N. Spadine

    (College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA)

Abstract

Known for its ability to improve fitness and health, high-intensity functional training (HIFT) focuses on functional movements completed at high intensities, often yielding outcomes superior to repetitive aerobic workouts. Preference for and tolerance of high-intensity exercise are associated with enjoyment of and adherence to HIFT. Similarly, the social environment present within CrossFit, a popular group-based HIFT modality, is important to the enjoyment of and adherence to HIFT. This study aimed to test whether preference and tolerance were related to social connections within CrossFit networks. Linear network autocorrelation models (LNAMs) and exponential random graph models (ERGMs) were computed on sociometric and attribute data from members of three CrossFit networks (n = 197). LNAMs showed the preference and tolerance scores of someone’s social connections were associated with their own in all three gyms, and ERGMs demonstrated preference and tolerance scores were associated with the presence of social ties within all networks. This study is the first to provide evidence for a relationship between social connections and preference and tolerance. Future longitudinal research is needed to determine if the social environment may influence and optimize a person’s preference of and tolerance for HIFT.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan S. Patterson & Katie M. Heinrich & Tyler Prochnow & Taylor Graves-Boswell & Mandy N. Spadine, 2020. "Network Analysis of the Social Environment Relative to Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in CrossFit Gyms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8370-:d:443821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinan Aral & Christos Nicolaides, 2017. "Exercise contagion in a global social network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Mario Azevedo & Cora Araújo & Felipe Reichert & Fernando Siqueira & Marcelo Silva & Pedro Hallal, 2007. "Gender differences in leisure-time physical activity," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 52(1), pages 8-15, February.
    3. Daniel Carpenter & Kevin Esterling & David Lazer, 2003. "The Strength of Strong Ties," Rationality and Society, , vol. 15(4), pages 411-440, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tyler Prochnow & Christina Amo & Megan S. Patterson & Katie M. Heinrich, 2022. "I CrossFit; Do You? Cross-Sectional Peer Similarity of Physical Activity Behavior in a Group High Intensity Functional Training Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-9, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ragna Stalsberg & Arve Vorland Pedersen, 2018. "Are Differences in Physical Activity across Socioeconomic Groups Associated with Choice of Physical Activity Variables to Report?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Yi Cao & Tao Zhou & Jian Gao, 2024. "Heterogeneous peer effects of college roommates on academic performance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Galaz, Victor & Crona, Beatrice & Österblom, Henrik & Olsson, Per & Folke, Carl, 2012. "Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries — Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-32.
    4. Christos Nicolaides & Demetris Avraam & Luis Cueto‐Felgueroso & Marta C. González & Ruben Juanes, 2020. "Hand‐Hygiene Mitigation Strategies Against Global Disease Spreading through the Air Transportation Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 723-740, April.
    5. Michael P. Leung, 2023. "Network Cluster‐Robust Inference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(2), pages 641-667, March.
    6. Ana Balsa & Carlos Díaz, 2018. "Social interactions in health behaviors and conditions," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1802, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    7. Francisco Perales & Jesus del Pozo-Cruz & Borja del Pozo-Cruz, 2015. "Long-term dynamics in physical activity behaviour across the transition to parenthood," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(3), pages 301-308, March.
    8. Deepti Adlakha & J. Aaron Hipp & James F. Sallis & Ross C. Brownson, 2018. "Exploring Neighborhood Environments and Active Commuting in Chennai, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Indrani Saran & Günther Fink & Margaret McConnell, 2018. "How does anonymous online peer communication affect prevention behavior? Evidence from a laboratory experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Di Lizia, Adam, 2024. "Social Influence in Online Reviews : Evidence from the Steam Store," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1505, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    11. Grace Lordan & Debayan Pakrashi, 2015. "Do All Activities “Weigh” Equally? How Different Physical Activities Differ as Predictors of Weight," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 2069-2086, November.
    12. Dagenais, Christian & Laurendeau, Marie-Claire & Briand-Lamarche, Mélodie, 2015. "Knowledge brokering in public health: A critical analysis of the results of a qualitative evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 10-17.
    13. Vitalis, Kyriacos & Stefanidis, Dimosthenis & Pallis, George & Dikaiakos, Marios & Nicolaou, Nicos & Nicolaides, Christos, 2024. "Quantifying the impact of online social networks on the success of entrepreneurs," OSF Preprints x6vda, Center for Open Science.
    14. Tássia Fraga Bastos & Ana Maria Canesqui & Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros, 2015. ""Healthy Men" and High Mortality: Contributions from a Population-Based Study for the Gender Paradox Discussion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-11, December.
    15. László Lőrincz & Guilherme Kenji Chihaya & Anikó Hannák & Dávid Takács & Balázs Lengyel & Rikard Eriksson, 2020. "Global Connections And The Structure Of Skills In Local Co-Worker Networks," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2034, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    16. Pinar Yildirim & Yanhao Wei & Christophe Bulte & Joy Lu, 2020. "Social network design for inducing effort," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 381-417, December.
    17. Kevin Rudolf & Bianca Biallas & Lea A. L. Dejonghe & Christopher Grieben & Lisa-Marie Rückel & Andrea Schaller & Gerrit Stassen & Holger Pfaff & Ingo Froböse, 2019. "Influence of Health Literacy on the Physical Activity of Working Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the TRISEARCH Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Massimiliano Pau & Micaela Porta & Giancarlo Coghe & Jessica Frau & Lorena Lorefice & Eleonora Cocco, 2020. "Does Multiple Sclerosis Differently Impact Physical Activity in Women and Man? A Quantitative Study Based on Wearable Accelerometers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Jan Beyers & Tom Donas, 2014. "Inter-regional networks in Brussels: Analyzing the information exchanges among regional offices," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 547-571, December.
    20. Shichang Deng & Jun Gao, 2017. "The Mediating Roles of Work–Family Conflict and Facilitation in the Relations Between Leisure Experience and Job/Life Satisfaction Among Employees in Shanghai Banking Industry," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1641-1657, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8370-:d:443821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.