IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7737-d433298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojing Liu

    (Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Wenyi Du

    (Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Management Science Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yijie Sun

    (Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

In the market, once consumers have a low-carbon preference, they will choose green low-carbon products. The market demand for green products is not only related to product price, but also consumers’ low-carbon preference. In this way, enterprise has to consider the cost of carbon emissions in the process of production and operation. In this paper, we consider a two-level supply chain system composed of a manufacturer and a retailer. The supply chain system can determine the price of products and the level of carbon emission reduction through different supply chain contracts: wholesale price contract and revenue sharing contract. However, the power control structure of a manufacturer and a retailer is different, which will further affect the decision-making strategy of the supply chain system. We set up four models (Wholesale Price—NM and NR, and Revenue-Sharing—SR and SM) of the supply chain with carbon emission reduction, and calculated and analyzed. The results show that firstly, regardless of whether the manufacturer’s power control structure or the retailer power structure is dominant, the manufacturer wholesale price with a contract on revenue-sharing is always higher than on wholesale price, and it is inversely proportional to the revenue-sharing proportion. Secondly, under the two power control structures, the carbon emission level of the manufacturer with a contract on revenue-sharing is always lower than on wholesale price, and it gradually decreases with the increase of the revenue-sharing proportion of the manufacturers. Thirdly, when the retailer dominates the supply chain, the retailer selling price with a contract on revenue-sharing is always higher than on wholesale price. Under the manufacturer’s power control structure, when the revenue-sharing ratio is small, the retailer selling price with a contract on revenue-sharing is higher than on wholesale price; when the revenue-sharing ratio is large, the retailer selling price with a contract on revenue-sharing is lower than on wholesale price. Finally, the validity of the model is verified by an example, and the sensitivity of the parameters is analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojing Liu & Wenyi Du & Yijie Sun, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7737-:d:433298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pietro Giovanni, 2014. "Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 220(1), pages 135-157, September.
    2. Tianjian Yang & Guangdong Liu & Yao Wei & Xuemei Zhang & Xinglin Dong, 2019. "The Impact of Dual-Fairness Concerns Under Different Power: Structures on Green-Supply-Chain Decisions," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2012. "A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 568-583.
    4. Ji, Jingna & Zhang, Zhiyong & Yang, Lei, 2017. "Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 68-84.
    5. Du, Shaofu & Zhu, Lili & Liang, Liang & Ma, Fang, 2013. "Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-67.
    6. Liang Wang & Tingjia Xu & Longhao Qin, 2019. "A Study on Supply Chain Emission Reduction Level Based on Carbon Tax and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preferences under Stochastic Demand," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, May.
    7. Chong Xin & Yunzhu Zhou & Xiaochen Zhu & Lin Li & Xin Chen, 2019. "Optimal Decisions for Carbon Emission Reduction through Technological Innovation in a Hybrid-Channel Supply Chain with Consumers’ Channel Preferences," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-24, January.
    8. Chang Su & Xiaojing Liu & Wenyi Du, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Decisions Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness under Different Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Ma, Peng & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2013. "Supply chain channel strategies with quality and marketing effort-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 572-581.
    10. Hovelaque, Vincent & Bironneau, Laurent, 2015. "The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 285-291.
    11. Wenyi Du & Yubing Fan & Lina Yan, 2018. "Pricing Strategies for Competitive Water Supply Chains under Different Power Structures: An Application to the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Letmathe, Peter & Balakrishnan, Nagraj, 2005. "Environmental considerations on the optimal product mix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 398-412, December.
    13. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.
    14. Hammami, Ramzi & Nouira, Imen & Frein, Yannick, 2015. "Carbon emissions in a multi-echelon production-inventory model with lead time constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 292-307.
    15. Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2016. "The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1235-1258, May.
    16. Yang, Huixiao & Luo, Jianwen & Wang, Haijun, 2017. "The role of revenue sharing and first-mover advantage in emission abatement with carbon tax and consumer environmental awareness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 691-702.
    17. Yang, Lei & Hu, Yijuan & Huang, Lijuan, 2020. "Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 480-496.
    18. Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin & Niu, Wenjing & Feng, Qun & Yang, Ranran, 2014. "How does individual low-carbon consumption behavior occur? – An analysis based on attitude process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 376-386.
    19. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shizhen Bai & Xuelian Jia, 2023. "The Impact of the Cost-Sharing Contract on Capital-Constrained Agricultural Supply Chains," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    2. Rubi Das & Abhijit Barman & Balaji Roy & Pijus Kanti De, 2023. "Pricing and greening strategies in a dual-channel supply chain with cost and profit sharing contracts," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5053-5086, June.
    3. Fayu Chen & Jinhao Liu & Xiaoyu Liu & Hua Zhang, 2023. "Static and Dynamic Evaluation of Financing Efficiency in Enterprises’ Low-Carbon Supply Chain: PCA–DEA–Malmquist Model Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Bo Yan & Yanping Liu & Zijie Jin, 2023. "Joint coordination contract for capital‐constrained supply chains under asymmetric information," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 251-270, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang Su & Xiaojing Liu & Wenyi Du, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Decisions Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness under Different Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Xu, Song & Govindan, Kannan & Wang, Wanru & Yang, Wenting, 2024. "Supply chain management under cap-and-trade regulation: A literature review and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    5. Yang, Huixiao & Luo, Jianwen & Wang, Haijun, 2017. "The role of revenue sharing and first-mover advantage in emission abatement with carbon tax and consumer environmental awareness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 691-702.
    6. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Gan Wan & Gang Kou & Tie Li & Feng Xiao & Yang Chen, 2020. "Pricing Policies in a Retailer Stackelberg O2O Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Cheng, Fei & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2022. "Cost-reducing strategy or emission-reducing strategy? The choice of low-carbon decisions under price threshold subsidy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Subrata Saha & Zbigniew Banaszak & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Izabela Ewa Nielsen, 2022. "Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3713-3746, September.
    10. Raza, Syed Asif & Govindaluri, Srikrishna Madhumohan, 2019. "Pricing strategies in a dual-channel green supply chain with cannibalization and risk aversion," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    11. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Regulatory versus consumer pressure and retailer responsibility for upstream pollution in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Heydari, Jafar & Bineshpour, Pegah & Walther, Grit & Ülkü, M. Ali, 2022. "Reconciling conflict of interests in a green retailing channel with green sales effort," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Xia, Senmao & Ling, Yantao & de Main, Leanne & Lim, Ming K. & Li, Gendao & Zhang, Peter & Cao, Mengqiu, 2022. "Creating a low carbon economy through green supply chain management: investigation of willingness-to-pay for green products from a consumer’s perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Nouira, Imen & Hammami, Ramzi & Frein, Yannick & Temponi, Cecilia, 2016. "Design of forward supply chains: Impact of a carbon emissions-sensitive demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 80-98.
    15. Fangfang Guo & Tao Zhang & Xiuquan Huang & Yaoguang Zhong, 2023. "Government Subsidy Strategies Considering Greenness on Agricultural Product E-Commerce Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Varun Sharma & Alok Raj & Abhishek Chakraborty, 2023. "Analysis of power dynamics in sustainable supply chain under non-linear demand setup," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 18-32, March.
    17. Yang Tong & Yina Li, 2018. "External Intervention or Internal Coordination? Incentives to Promote Sustainable Development through Green Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Shan Chang & Bin Hu & Xiuhong He, 2019. "Supply Chain Coordination in the Context of Green Marketing Efforts and Capacity Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Yang, Guangyong & Ji, Guojun & Tan, Kim Hua, 2020. "Impact of regulatory intervention and consumer environmental concern on product introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Lei Yang & Jingna Ji & Chenshi Zheng, 2016. "Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7737-:d:433298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.