IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7011-d419417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Infantile Colic—The Perspective of German and Polish Pediatricians in 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Henning Sommermeyer

    (Department of Medicine, The President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz, Nowy Šwiat 4, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland)

  • Hanna Krauss

    (Department of Medicine, The President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz, Nowy Šwiat 4, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland)

  • Zuzanna Chęcińska-Maciejewska

    (Physiology Department, Karol Marcinkowski Medical University in Poznań, ul. Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań, Poland)

  • Marcin Pszczola

    (Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznań University of Life Science, Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Jacek Piątek

    (Department of Medicine, The President Stanisław Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz, Nowy Šwiat 4, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to characterize how infantile colic is perceived and managed by German and Polish pediatricians. Data in both countries were collected by using a paper questionnaire with seven questions and predefined and free text fields for the answers. Answers from 160 German and 133 Polish pediatricians were collected. The average of the occurrence rates estimated by both responder groups were at the higher end of published rates. The majority of pediatricians from both countries rated the parental burden caused by infantile colic to be high or very high. Pediatricians’ awareness about the association between infantile colic and maternal depression and premature termination of breastfeeding is relatively well established in both countries. While more than 90% of German pediatricians stated knowledge of infantile colic being a major risk factor for shaken baby syndrome, this knowledge was only declared by half of the Polish responders. Pharmacological interventions, pro-/synbiotics or simethicone, are part of the treatment repertoire of nearly all responding pediatricians. In addition, non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., change of feeding, change of parental behavior) are also among the employed interventions. Results of this study will allow to better design and prioritize communication about infantile colic directed at pediatricians.

Suggested Citation

  • Henning Sommermeyer & Hanna Krauss & Zuzanna Chęcińska-Maciejewska & Marcin Pszczola & Jacek Piątek, 2020. "Infantile Colic—The Perspective of German and Polish Pediatricians in 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7011-:d:419417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hothorn, Torsten & Hornik, Kurt & van de Wiel, Mark A. & Zeileis, Achim, 2006. "A Lego System for Conditional Inference," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 60, pages 257-263, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomáš Želinský, 2015. "Nekonzistentnosť časových preferencií ľudí z arginalizovaných rómskych komunít [On inconsistency of time preferences of people from the marginalised roma communities]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 204-222.
    2. repec:jss:jstsof:36:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Georgina Milne & Andrew William Byrne & Emma Campbell & Jordon Graham & John McGrath & Raymond Kirke & Wilma McMaster & Jesko Zimmermann & Adewale Henry Adenuga, 2022. "Quantifying Land Fragmentation in Northern Irish Cattle Enterprises," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Payton J. Jones & Patrick Mair & Thorsten Simon & Achim Zeileis, 2020. "Network Trees: A Method for Recursively Partitioning Covariance Structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 926-945, December.
    5. Seibold Heidi & Zeileis Achim & Hothorn Torsten, 2016. "Model-Based Recursive Partitioning for Subgroup Analyses," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 45-63, May.
    6. McGinlay, James & Parsons, David J. & Morris, Joe & Hubatova, Marie & Graves, Anil & Bradbury, Richard B. & Bullock, James M., 2017. "Do charismatic species groups generate more cultural ecosystem service benefits?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 15-24.
    7. Marc Ditzhaus & Arnold Janssen, 2020. "Bootstrap and permutation rank tests for proportional hazards under right censoring," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 493-517, July.
    8. Elsäßer Amelie & Victor Anja & Hommel Gerhard, 2011. "Multiple Testing in Candidate Gene Situations: A Comparison of Classical, Discrete, and Resampling-Based Procedures," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, November.
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:28:i08 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Torsten Hothorn & Achim Zeileis, 2008. "Generalized Maximally Selected Statistics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1263-1269, December.
    11. Jorge M. Arevalillo & Hilario Navarro, 2021. "Skewness-Kurtosis Model-Based Projection Pursuit with Application to Summarizing Gene Expression Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Chavez, Alex K. & Bicchieri, Cristina, 2013. "Third-party sanctioning and compensation behavior: Findings from the ultimatum game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 268-277.
    13. Raphael Knevels & Alexander Brenning & Simone Gingrich & Gerhard Heiss & Theresia Lechner & Philip Leopold & Christoph Plutzar & Herwig Proske & Helene Petschko, 2021. "Towards the Use of Land Use Legacies in Landslide Modeling: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives in an Austrian Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, September.
    14. Hongjun Bai & Eric Lewitus & Yifan Li & Paul V. Thomas & Michelle Zemil & Mélanie Merbah & Caroline E. Peterson & Thujitha Thuraisamy & Phyllis A. Rees & Agnes Hajduczki & Vincent Dussupt & Bonnie Sli, 2024. "Contemporary HIV-1 consensus Env with AI-assisted redesigned hypervariable loops promote antibody binding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Hothorn, Torsten & Hornik, Kurt & van de Wiel, Mark A. & Zeileis, Achim, 2008. "Implementing a Class of Permutation Tests: The coin Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i08).
    16. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Bryan Keller, 2012. "Detecting Treatment Effects with Small Samples: The Power of Some Tests Under the Randomization Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 324-338, April.
    18. Zeileis, Achim & Croissant, Yves, 2010. "Extended Model Formulas in R: Multiple Parts and Multiple Responses," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 34(i01).
    19. Nordhausen, Klaus & Oja, Hannu, 2011. "Multivariate L1 Statistical Methods: The Package MNM," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 43(i05).
    20. Santiago Carbo-Valverde & Pedro Cuadros-Solas & Francisco Rodríguez-Fernández, 2020. "A machine learning approach to the digitalization of bank customers: Evidence from random and causal forests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-39, October.
    21. Ribas, Giovana Ghisleni & Zanon, Alencar Junior & Streck, Nereu Augusto & Pilecco, Isabela Bulegon & de Souza, Pablo Mazzuco & Heinemann, Alexandre Bryan & Grassini, Patricio, 2021. "Assessing yield and economic impact of introducing soybean to the lowland rice system in southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    22. Millo, Giovanni, 2014. "Robust standard error estimators for panel models: a unifying approach," MPRA Paper 54954, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    23. Tlacaelel Rivera-Núñez & Luis García-Barrios & Mariana Benítez & Julieta A. Rosell & Rodrigo García-Herrera & Erin Estrada-Lugo, 2022. "Unravelling the Paradoxical Seasonal Food Scarcity in a Peasant Microregion of Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7011-:d:419417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.