IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6751-d414462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of the Quality of Life in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration by Using Filters

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Caballe-Fontanet

    (School of Biomedical and Health Science, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina

    (School of Biomedical and Health Science, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Neus Busquet-Duran

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, 08243 Manresa, Spain)

  • Eduard Pedemonte-Sarrias

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, 08243 Manresa, Spain
    Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Vic, 08500 Vic, Spain)

  • Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena

    (School of Biomedical and Health Science, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a disease with an increasing incidence due to the general aging of the population that decreases the patient’s quality of life. This work aims to study whether selective cut optical filters improve the AMD patient’s quality of life. Methods: Prospective and longitudinal study in 79 patients. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and the line differences in the Colenbrander test were measured. Patients answered The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), which measures the quality of life related to vision before and after using cut optical filters. Results: There was an improvement of 5.99 points (3.7–8.3) in NEI VFQ-25 after wearing filters. This improvement was 4.0 points for 450-nm filters and 12.7 points for 511-nm filters. For patients with visual acuity (VA) < 0.25, results of NEI VFQ-25 increased by 10.11 points (1.19–19.02) and for patients with late AMDs, results increased by 5.33 points (1.31–9.35). Conclusions: Selective filters improve the quality of life of patients with AMD. The success rate in the fitting of filters is better for those with VA lower than 0.25 and those with late or advanced AMD.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Caballe-Fontanet & Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina & Neus Busquet-Duran & Eduard Pedemonte-Sarrias & Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena, 2020. "Improvement of the Quality of Life in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration by Using Filters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-7, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6751-:d:414462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esther Herberich & Johannes Sikorski & Torsten Hothorn, 2010. "A Robust Procedure for Comparing Multiple Means under Heteroscedasticity in Unbalanced Designs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharina J. Heinemann & Sun-Young Yang & Henryk Straube & Nieves Medina-Escobar & Marina Varbanova-Herde & Marco Herde & Sangkee Rhee & Claus-Peter Witte, 2021. "Initiation of cytosolic plant purine nucleotide catabolism involves a monospecific xanthosine monophosphate phosphatase," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Mario Hasler, 2016. "Heteroscedasticity: multiple degrees of freedom vs. sandwich estimation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 55-68, March.
    3. Turner, Matthew D. & Moumouni, Oumarou, 2018. "The dividing of fields in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa: The roles of soil fertility variation and legal doctrine," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 362-374.
    4. Iparraguirre, José Luis & Ma, Ruosi, 2015. "Efficiency in the provision of social care for older people. A three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis using self-reported quality of life," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-46.
    5. Umlauft, Maria & Placzek, Marius & Konietschke, Frank & Pauly, Markus, 2019. "Wild bootstrapping rank-based procedures: Multiple testing in nonparametric factorial repeated measures designs," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 176-192.
    6. Konietschke Frank & Bösiger Sandra & Brunner Edgar & Hothorn Ludwig A., 2013. "Are Multiple Contrast Tests Superior to the ANOVA?," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 63-73, August.
    7. Marian Reiff & Erik Šoltés & Silvia Komara & Tatiana Šoltésová & Silvia Zelinová, 2022. "Segmentation and estimation of claim severity in motor third-party liability insurance through contrast analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 803-842, September.
    8. Mario Hasler, 2016. "Heteroscedasticity: multiple degrees of freedom vs. sandwich estimation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 55-68, March.
    9. Philip Pallmann & Ludwig A. Hothorn, 2016. "Analysis of means: a generalized approach using R," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1541-1560, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6751-:d:414462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.