IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5711-d395902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational Effects on the Impacts of Technology Use in Later Life: Insights from an International, Multi-Site Study

Author

Listed:
  • Shannon Freeman

    (School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada)

  • Hannah R. Marston

    (Health and Wellbeing Strategic Research Area, School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK)

  • Janna Olynick

    (School of Nursing and Department of Psychology, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada)

  • Charles Musselwhite

    (Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK)

  • Cory Kulczycki

    (Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Rebecca Genoe

    (Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Beibei Xiong

    (School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada)

Abstract

As the use of technology becomes further integrated into the daily lives of all persons, including older adults, it is important to investigate how the perceptions and use of technology intersect with intergenerational relationships. Based on the international multi-centered study Technology In Later Life (TILL), this paper emphasizes the perceptions of older adults and the interconnection between technology and intergenerational relationships are integral to social connectedness with others. Participants from rural and urban sites in Canada and the UK ( n = 37) completed an online survey and attended a focus group. Descriptive and thematic analyses suggest that older adults are not technologically adverse and leverage intergenerational relationships with family and friends to adjust to new technologies and to remain connected to adult children and grandchildren, especially when there is high geographic separation between them. Participants referenced younger family members as having introduced them to, and having taught them how to use, technologies such as digital devices, computers, and social networking sites. The intergenerational support in the adoption of new technologies has important implications for helping older persons to remain independent and to age in place, in both age-friendly cities and in rural communities. The findings contribute to the growing literature in the fields of gerontology and gerontechnology on intergenerational influences and the impacts of technology use in later life and suggest the flexibility and willingness of older persons to adopt to new technologies as well as the value of intergenerational relationships for overcoming barriers to technology adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Shannon Freeman & Hannah R. Marston & Janna Olynick & Charles Musselwhite & Cory Kulczycki & Rebecca Genoe & Beibei Xiong, 2020. "Intergenerational Effects on the Impacts of Technology Use in Later Life: Insights from an International, Multi-Site Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5711-:d:395902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5711/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5711/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hannah R. Marston & Joost van Hoof, 2019. "“Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Hannah R. Marston, 2019. "Millennials and ICT—Findings from the Technology 4 Young Adults (T4YA) Project: An Exploratory Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Carmen Llorente-Barroso & María Sánchez-Valle & Mónica Viñarás-Abad, 2023. "The role of the Internet in later life autonomy: Silver surfers in Spain," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Melanie Davern & Rachel Winterton & Kathleen Brasher & Geoff Woolcock, 2020. "How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Sónia Rolland Sobral & Margarida Sobral, 2021. "Computer Education and Third Age Universities: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Mary Chidiac & Christopher Ross & Hannah R. Marston & Shannon Freeman, 2022. "Age and Gender Perspectives on Social Media and Technology Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Carmen Llorente-Barroso & Olga Kolotouchkina & Luis Mañas-Viniegra, 2021. "The Enabling Role of ICT to Mitigate the Negative Effects of Emotional and Social Loneliness of the Elderly during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Wang, Xize, 2022. "Impact of Health on Driving for America's Older Adults: A Nationwide, Longitudinal Study," SocArXiv h5scf, Center for Open Science.
    8. Jikun Huang & Lanlan Su & Qiwang Huang & Xinyu Liu, 2022. "Facilitating inclusive ICT application and e‐Commerce development in rural China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(6), pages 938-952, November.
    9. Alejandro Canedo-García & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez & Deilis-Ivonne Pacheco-Sanz, 2021. "Benefits, Satisfaction and Limitations Derived from the Performance of Intergenerational Virtual Activities: Data from a General Population Spanish Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannah R. Marston & Kelly Niles-Yokum & Paula Alexandra Silva, 2021. "A Commentary on Blue Zones ® : A Critical Review of Age-Friendly Environments in the 21st Century and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Anthony A. Sterns & Harvey L. Sterns & Ann Walter, 2020. "Prioritizing Age-Friendly Domains for Transforming a Mid-Sized American City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-30, December.
    3. Liliya Eugenevna Ziganshina & Ekaterina V. Yudina & Liliya I. Talipova & Guzel N. Sharafutdinova & Rustem N. Khairullin, 2020. "Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Russia: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes, Perceptions, Quality of Life and Health Information Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Belinda Paulovich & Sonja Pedell & Erica Tandori & Jeanie Beh, 2022. "Weaving Social Connectivity into the Community Fabric: Exploring Older Adult’s Relationships to Technology and Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Phillip T. Bengel & Carina Peter, 2022. "Technology in Nature—mDGBL as a Successful Approach to Promote Complex Contents?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Hannah Ramsden Marston & Linda Shore & P.J. White, 2020. "How does a (Smart) Age-Friendly Ecosystem Look in a Post-Pandemic Society?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-43, November.
    8. Joost van Hoof & Jeroen Dikken & Willeke H. van Staalduinen & Suzan van der Pas & Rudy F. M. van den Hoven & Loes M. T. Hulsebosch-Janssen, 2022. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Sense of Safety and Security of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. The Case of the Age-Friendly City of The Hague," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Sariyamon Tiraphat & Doungjai Buntup & Murallitharan Munisamy & Thang Huu Nguyen & Motoyuki Yuasa & Myo Nyein Aung & Aung Hpone Myint, 2020. "Age-Friendly Environments in ASEAN Plus Three: Case Studies from Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Vietnam, and Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Eugène Loos & Maria Sourbati & Frauke Behrendt, 2020. "The Role of Mobility Digital Ecosystems for Age-Friendly Urban Public Transport: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Tine Buffel & Sophie Yarker & Chris Phillipson & Luciana Lang & Camilla Lewis & Patty Doran & Mhorag Goff, 2023. "Locked down by inequality: Older people and the COVID-19 pandemic," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(8), pages 1465-1482, June.
    12. Loredana Ivan & Dorin Beu & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Jeroen Dikken & Rudy F.M. van den Hoven & Willeke H. van Staalduinen & Loes M.T. Hulsebosch-Janssen & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "How Older People Experience the Age-Friendliness of Their City: Development of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Sabina Baraković & Jasmina Baraković Husić & Joost van Hoof & Ondrej Krejcar & Petra Maresova & Zahid Akhtar & Francisco Jose Melero, 2020. "Quality of Life Framework for Personalised Ageing: A Systematic Review of ICT Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Chunmei Zhang & Jun Yang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Quality of the Age-Friendly Environment in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Bram de Boer & Belkis Bozdemir & Jack Jansen & Monique Hermans & Jan P. H. Hamers & Hilde Verbeek, 2020. "The Homestead: Developing a Conceptual Framework through Co-Creation for Innovating Long-Term Dementia Care Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Miguel Ángel Navas-Martín & José Antonio López-Bueno & María Soledad Ascaso-Sánchez & Fernando Follos & José Manuel Vellón & Isidro Juan Mirón & María Yolanda Luna & Gerardo Sánchez-Martínez & Julio D, 2023. "Territory Differences in Adaptation to Heat among Persons Aged 65 Years and Over in Spain (1983–2018)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Paola Monachesi, 2023. "Age Friendly Characteristics and Sense of Community of an Italian City: The Case of Macerata," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Eugene Seo & Sanghee Lee, 2023. "Implications of Aging in Place in the Context of the Residential Environment: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-30, October.
    20. Katja M. Rusinovic & Marianne E. van Bochove & Suzanna Koops-Boelaars & Zsuzsu K.C.T. Tavy & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "Towards Responsible Rebellion: How Founders Deal with Challenges in Establishing and Governing Innovative Living Arrangements for Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5711-:d:395902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.