IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p57-d467191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Homestead: Developing a Conceptual Framework through Co-Creation for Innovating Long-Term Dementia Care Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Bram de Boer

    (Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Belkis Bozdemir

    (Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
    MeanderGroep Zuid Limburg, 6372 PP Landgraaf, The Netherlands)

  • Jack Jansen

    (Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
    MeanderGroep Zuid Limburg, 6372 PP Landgraaf, The Netherlands)

  • Monique Hermans

    (Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
    MeanderGroep Zuid Limburg, 6372 PP Landgraaf, The Netherlands)

  • Jan P. H. Hamers

    (Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Hilde Verbeek

    (Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Alternative care environments for regular nursing homes are highly warranted to promote health and well-being of residents with dementia that are part of an age-friendly and dementia-friendly city and society. Insight is lacking on how to translate evidence-based knowledge from theory into a congruent conceptual model for innovation in current practice. This study reports on the co-creation of an alternative nursing home model in the Netherlands. A participatory research approach was used to co-create a conceptual framework with researchers, practitioners and older people following an iterative process. Results indicate that achieving positive outcomes for people with dementia, (in)formal caregivers, and the community is dependent on how well the physical, social and organizational environment are congruently designed. The theoretical underpinnings of the conceptual model have been translated into “the homestead,” which is conceptualized around three main pillars: activation, freedom and relationships. The Homestead Care Model is an illustrative example of how residential care facilities can support the development of age-friendly communities that take into consideration the needs and requirements of older citizens. However, challenges remain to implement radical changes within residential care. More research is needed into the actual implementation of the Homestead Care Model.

Suggested Citation

  • Bram de Boer & Belkis Bozdemir & Jack Jansen & Monique Hermans & Jan P. H. Hamers & Hilde Verbeek, 2020. "The Homestead: Developing a Conceptual Framework through Co-Creation for Innovating Long-Term Dementia Care Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:57-:d:467191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Hannah R. Marston & Joost van Hoof, 2019. "“Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-35, September.
    3. Annica Backman & Petra Ahnlund & Karin Sjögren & Hugo Lövheim & Katherine S. McGilton & David Edvardsson, 2020. "Embodying person‐centred being and doing: Leading towards person‐centred care in nursing homes as narrated by managers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 172-183, January.
    4. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Seneca Terkelsen & Christian Tolstrup Wester & Gabriel Gulis & Jørgen Jespersen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen, 2022. "Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Valentina Bressan & Allette Snijder & Henriette Hansen & Kim Koldby & Knud Damgaard Andersen & Natalia Allegretti & Federica Porcu & Sara Marsillas & Alvaro García & Alvisa Palese, 2022. "Supporting the Community to Embrace Individuals with Dementia and to Be More Inclusive: Findings of a Conceptual Framework Development Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    4. Anne Seneca Terkelsen & Christian Tolstrup Wester & Gabriel Gulis & Jørgen Jespersen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen, 2022. "Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Anthony A. Sterns & Harvey L. Sterns & Ann Walter, 2020. "Prioritizing Age-Friendly Domains for Transforming a Mid-Sized American City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-30, December.
    6. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Mateusz Grzesiak, 2020. "Cooperation between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Online and Offline Environments vs. the Benefits Derived by Active Purchasers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Margaret von Faber & Zsuzsu Tavy & Suzan van der Pas, 2020. "Engaging Older People in Age-Friendly Cities through Participatory Video Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Abdulaziz Aldegheishem, 2024. "Assessing progress towards smart governance in Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Fatuma Namisango & Kyeong Kang & Ghassan Beydoun, 2022. "How the Structures Provided by Social Media Enable Collaborative Outcomes: A Study of Service Co-creation in Nonprofits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 517-535, April.
    11. Oluwasoye P. Mafimisebi & Adekunle I. Ogunsade, 2022. "Unlocking a Continent of Opportunity: Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems for Value Creation in Africa," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 11-22, March.
    12. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.
    13. Belinda Paulovich & Sonja Pedell & Erica Tandori & Jeanie Beh, 2022. "Weaving Social Connectivity into the Community Fabric: Exploring Older Adult’s Relationships to Technology and Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Bradbury-Jones, Caroline & Isham, Louise & Taylor, Julie, 2018. "The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 80-91.
    15. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    17. Fatima, Samar & Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S., 2020. "National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 178-194.
    18. Bokyong Shin & Mikko Rask, 2021. "Assessment of Online Deliberative Quality: New Indicators Using Network Analysis and Time-Series Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Nathalie Colasanti & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The Third Sector and Civil Society?," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Magdalena Potz & Solange Hernandez & Sarah Serval, 2024. "From Wicked Problems to the Wickedization of Solutions: The Case of the French Citizens Convention for Climate," Post-Print hal-04714400, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:57-:d:467191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.