IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5375-d389994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihong Chen

    (Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and regarded as co-first authors.)

  • Chaochuang Zhang

    (Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and regarded as co-first authors.)

  • Guanhua Fan

    (Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and regarded as co-first authors.)

Abstract

Objective: The peer interaction–based online model has been influential in the recent development of diabetes management. This model “extends and innovates” the traditional mode of doctor–patient guidance, transforming it into a mode in which both doctor–patient guidance and patient–patient interaction coexist; this new mode has the added advantage of offering “extended continual intervention.” This study contributes to research on extending diabetes management models by investigating how patients with diabetes or prediabetes interact in online health communities, focusing on the interrelationship between self-efficacy characteristics and online participation during patient–patient interactions. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants with diabetes of various severities completed an electronic questionnaire, which was formulated with a revised classical scale. The questionnaire was disseminated through diabetes online health communities. Its content covered the respondent’s general condition, self-evaluation of their self-efficacy, and participation in online health communities, specifically with respect to factors such as the time spent in online information each day, the number of groups joined, and the extent of interaction in diabetes online health communities, etc. The main observation indicators were the participants’ self-efficacy, their extent of online participation, and the characteristics of online health communities. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, linear trend estimation, and ordinal logistic regression were used to explore the relationship between the three indicators. Results: The self-efficacy scores ( x ¯ ± s) were 51.9 ± 9.12, and 59.1% of interviewed participants had self-efficacy scores greater than the mean. Overall, most participants (96%) considered online diabetes social platforms to be helpful. Groups differed with respect to interaction mode, which indicated that people with high self-efficacy tend to employ various modes of interaction. Participants with high self-efficacy were also more likely to live in cities ( p < 0.05) and be married ( p < 0.05) and tended to spend more time paying attention to group information ( p < 0.05), spend more time viewing group information ( p < 0.05), and have a greater degree of interaction with group members ( p < 0.05). Information sources for the different grades of participants was primarily obtained from social media. Conclusion: Among people with diabetes, the frequency and intensity of online interaction might positively affect self-efficacy and, by implication, diabetes self-management. Diabetics with high self-efficacy also tend to have positive online interaction and adopt different ways of interaction. In addition, the diabetes information sources of the respondents mainly come from social networks, most of the respondents think that online social networking sites have a positive impact on diabetes self-management, which shows that social network plays an important role in diabetes information source of diabetics. However, the design of online health communities has room for improvement, specifically with respect to the provision of information that patients require. As an interesting side note, among people with diabetes or prediabetes, those who lived in urban area and were married, those who paid more attention to group information, and those who actively participated in interactions tended to have relatively high self-efficacy. The results suggest that people with diabetes have higher-quality self-care when they engage in online health community interactions; such benefits cannot be obtained from treatment in a hospital. In general, enhanced self-efficacy in people with diabetes enables them to more readily acquire diabetes-related knowledge. Online interaction with diabetics, who has the same experience, can not only get more information, but also have a sense of identity and belonging, which enhances self-efficacy and further urges them to actively participate in online interaction. Therefore, online health communities are an important supplement to the clinical treatment of diabetes mellitus and clinicians can take advantage of the educational function of online diabetes groups in their provision of tailored diabetes interventions and take into account the factors that affect the self-efficacy of diabetics (including the frequency and intensity of online interaction, age, marital status, residential area, etc.), to provide tailored diabetes interventions for diabetics. Such a use of online diabetes groups can strengthen diabetes self-management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihong Chen & Chaochuang Zhang & Guanhua Fan, 2020. "Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5375-:d:389994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siti Khuzaimah Ahmad Sharoni & Shu‐Fang Vivienne Wu, 2012. "Self‐efficacy and self‐care behavior of Malaysian patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross sectional survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 38-45, March.
    2. Wilson, W. & Pratt, C., 1987. "The impact of diabetes education and peer support upon weight and glycemic control of elderly persons with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 77(5), pages 634-635.
    3. Tricia K Gatlin & Reimund Serafica & Michael Johnson, 2017. "Systematic review of peer education intervention programmes among individuals with type 2 diabetes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4212-4222, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Price & Siân de Bell & Naomi Shaw & Alison Bethel & Rob Anderson & Jo Thompson Coon, 2022. "What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    2. Meng-Jung Wen & Martha Maurer & Luke Schwerer & Nassim Sarkarati & Ugboaku Maryann Egbujor & Jenna Nordin & Sharon D. Williams & Yao Liu & Olayinka O. Shiyanbola, 2022. "Perspectives on a Novel Culturally Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Program for African Americans: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Professionals and Organizational Leaders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Keith James Topping, 2022. "Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Shu‐Fang Vivienne Wu & Yi‐Ching Huang & Mei‐Chen Lee & Tsae‐Jyy Wang & Heng‐Hsin Tung & Meng‐Ping Wu, 2013. "Self‐efficacy, self‐care behavior, anxiety, and depression in Taiwanese with type 2 diabetes: A cross‐sectional survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 213-219, June.
    5. Tricia K Gatlin & Reimund Serafica & Michael Johnson, 2017. "Systematic review of peer education intervention programmes among individuals with type 2 diabetes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4212-4222, December.
    6. Brittany L. Smalls & Tiarney D. Ritchwood & Kinfe G. Bishu & Leonard E. Egede, 2020. "Racial/Ethnic Differences in Glycemic Control in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: United States 2003–2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Mullard, Jordan C.R. & Kawalek, Jessica & Parkin, Amy & Rayner, Clare & Mir, Ghazala & Sivan, Manoj & Greenhalgh, Trisha, 2023. "Towards evidence-based and inclusive models of peer support for long covid: A hermeneutic systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    8. Carol Brownson & Michele Heisler, 2009. "The Role of Peer Support in Diabetes Care and Self-Management," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(1), pages 5-17, March.
    9. Eun Ja Yeun & Sunsook Baek & Heejeong Kim, 2013. "Health promotion behavior in middle‐aged Koreans: A cross sectional survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 461-467, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5375-:d:389994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.