IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p4951-d382287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hepatitis C Reinfection in People Who Inject Drugs in Resource-Limited Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Abbe Muller

    (School of Nursing, Yale University, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT 06477, USA)

  • David Vlahov

    (School of Nursing, Yale University, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT 06477, USA
    Department of Epidemiology-Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA)

  • Matthew J. Akiyama

    (Department of Medicine, Divisions of General Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA)

  • Ann Kurth

    (School of Nursing, Yale University, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT 06477, USA
    Department of Epidemiology-Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA)

Abstract

Hepatitis C (HCV) is a global pandemic. The World Health Organization has developed a strategic plan for HCV elimination that focuses on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-risk populations, including people who inject drugs (PWID). While direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies are highly effective at eliminating HCV infections and have few side effects, medical professionals and policymakers remain concerned about the risk of reinfection among PWID. This study is a systematic review of research measuring the rate of HCV reinfection among PWID in LMICs and identifies additional areas for further research. A systematic search strategy was used to identify studies documenting HCV reinfection after sustained virologic response in PWID in LMICs. We refined results to include studies where at least 50% of participants had DAA treatment for primary HCV infection. Pooled reinfection rate was calculated across all studies. Seven studies met eligibility criteria. Most studies were conducted in six upper middle-income countries (Mexico, Romania, Russia, Taiwan, Georgi, and Brazil) and one lower middle-income country (Bangladesh) with a total of 7665 participants. No study included information from PWID in low-income countries. Sample sizes ranged from 200 to 3004 individuals, with demographic data missing for most participants. Four studies used deep gene sequencing, and reflex genotyping procedures to differentiate reinfection (infection by a different HCV genotype/subtype) from virologic relapse (infection by the same strain). The follow-up time of people cured from primary chronic HCV infection ranged from 12 weeks to 6.6 years. The pooled reinfection rate of all seven studies was 2.8 (range: 0.02 to 10.5) cases per 100 person-years (PY). In the five studies that differentiated relapse from reinfection, the incidence of reinfection was 1.0 per 100 PY. To date, research on reinfection rates among PWID in LMICs remains limited. Research focused on PWID in low-income countries is particularly needed to inform clinical decision making and evidence-based programs. While rates of reinfection among PWID who complete DAA treatment in upper and lower middle-income countries were similar or lower than rates observed in PWID in high-income countries, the rates were highly variable and factors may influence the accuracy of these measurements. This systematic review identifies several areas for continued research. Policies concerning access to HCV testing and treatment should be comprehensive and not place restrictions on PWID in these settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbe Muller & David Vlahov & Matthew J. Akiyama & Ann Kurth, 2020. "Hepatitis C Reinfection in People Who Inject Drugs in Resource-Limited Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4951-:d:382287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lifeng Lin, 2018. "Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaikumbung, Mayula, 2021. "Institutions and consumer preferences for renewable energy: A meta-regression analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Laura A. Outhwaite & Erin Early & Christothea Herodotou & Jo Van Herwegen, 2023. "Can Maths Apps Add Value to Learning? A Systematic Review," CEPEO Working Paper Series 23-02, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Jan 2023.
    3. Sean Cowlishaw & Isabella Freijah & Dzenana Kartal & Alyssa Sbisa & Ashlee Mulligan & MaryAnn Notarianni & Anne-Laure Couineau & David Forbes & Meaghan O’Donnell & Andrea Phelps & Katherine M. Iverson, 2022. "Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Surveys and Population Screening Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Samira Gonzalez-Hoelling & Carme Bertran-Noguer & Gloria Reig-Garcia & Rosa Suñer-Soler, 2021. "Effects of a Music-Based Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Balance in Subacute Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Fahad M. Al Amer & Christopher G. Thompson & Lifeng Lin, 2021. "Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4951-:d:382287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.