IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p204-d302553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Community Support, Users’ Interactions, and Value Co-Creation in Online Health Community: The Moderating Effect of Social Exclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Wenlong Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
    School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xiucheng Fan

    (School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Rongrong Ji

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Yi Jiang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

Abstract

Online health communities (OHCs) face the same problem as other social media platforms in terms of decreasing activity and user attrition. Drawing upon organizational support theory, this study explores how perceived community support affects user interactions and value co-creation which in turn influence their continuous participation. OHCs act as both health knowledge-sharing platforms and important social media for patients, and thus, interpersonal interactions in OHCs are categorized into health-related and general topic interactions. Considering the identity of patients, this study also examines the moderating effect of user-perceived social exclusion on the relationship between community support and user interaction. A total of 292 valid samples from a diabetic patient community in China were used to examine the proposed hypotheses through structural equation modeling. The results show that: (1) Community support has a positive effect on health topic and general topic interactions; (2) both types of interactions have significant positive effects on users’ perceived functional and social values, while general topic interaction is also related positively to users’ perceived affective value; (3) perceived functional value can result directly in continuous participation, while perceived social value contributes indirectly to continuous participation intention through perceived affective value; and (4) users perceived higher social exclusion are more influenced by community support to participate in health topic interactions than those who perceived lower social exclusion, while no significant difference in general topic interactions between two groups. The results of this study can provide implications for both researchers and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenlong Liu & Xiucheng Fan & Rongrong Ji & Yi Jiang, 2019. "Perceived Community Support, Users’ Interactions, and Value Co-Creation in Online Health Community: The Moderating Effect of Social Exclusion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:204-:d:302553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kandaurova, Maria & Lee, Seung Hwan (Mark), 2019. "The effects of Virtual Reality (VR) on charitable giving: The role of empathy, guilt, responsibility, and social exclusion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 571-580.
    2. Sanghee Oh, 2012. "The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 543-557, March.
    3. Georgi, Dominik & Mink, Moritz, 2013. "eCCIq: The quality of electronic customer-to-customer interaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11-19.
    4. Charla Mathwick & Caroline Wiertz & Ko de Ruyter, 2008. "Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 832-849, November.
    5. Busser, James A. & Shulga, Lenna V., 2018. "Co-created value: Multidimensional scale and nomological network," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 69-86.
    6. Yuhyung Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Tae Won Moon & Soomi Lee, 2019. "A Motivational Perspective on Job Insecurity: Relationships Between Job Insecurity, Intrinsic Motivation, and Performance and Behavioral Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Lu Yan & Yong Tan, 2014. "Feeling Blue? Go Online: An Empirical Study of Social Support Among Patients," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 690-709, December.
    8. Steven L. Johnson & Hani Safadi & Samer Faraj, 2015. "The Emergence of Online Community Leadership," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 165-187, March.
    9. Fiedler, Marina & Sarstedt, Marko, 2014. "Influence of community design on user behaviors in online communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2258-2268.
    10. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    11. Luo, Nuan & Zhang, Mingli & Hu, Mu & Wang, Yu, 2016. "How community interactions contribute to harmonious community relationships and customers’ identification in online brand community," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 673-685.
    12. Sanghee Oh, 2012. "The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(3), pages 543-557, March.
    13. Wei, Wei & Lu, Ying (Tracy) & Miao, Li & Cai, Liping A. & Wang, Chen-ya, 2017. "Customer-customer interactions (CCIs) at conferences: An identity approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 154-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingfang Liu & Jiayu Wang, 2021. "Users’ Intention to Continue Using Online Mental Health Communities: Empowerment Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni Huang & Zhijun Yan & Haonan Yin, 2021. "Effects of Online–Offline Service Integration on e‐Healthcare Providers: A Quasi‐Natural Experiment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2359-2378, August.
    2. Tseng, Hsiao-Ting & Ibrahim, Fahad & Hajli, Nick & Nisar, Tahir M. & Shabbir, Haseeb, 2022. "Effect of privacy concerns and engagement on social support behaviour in online health community platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Gen-Yih Liao & Tzu-Ling Huang & Alan R. Dennis & Ching-I Teng, 2024. "The Influence of Media Capabilities on Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 165-183, March.
    4. Erik Choi & Chirag Shah, 2016. "User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1182-1197, May.
    5. Zhizhen Yao & Zhenni Ni & Bin Zhang & Jian Du, 2022. "Do Informational and Emotional Elements Differ between Online Psychological and Physiological Disease Communities in China? A Comparative Study of Depression and Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Doreén Pick & Jacquelyn S. Thomas & Sebastian Tillmanns & Manfred Krafft, 2016. "Customer win-back: the role of attributions and perceptions in customers’ willingness to return," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 218-240, March.
    7. Jiabei Xia & Tailai Wu & Liqin Zhou, 2021. "Sharing of Verified Information about COVID-19 on Social Network Sites: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Johanna Gummerus & Veronica Liljander & Reija Sihlman, 2017. "Do Ethical Social Media Communities Pay Off? An Exploratory Study of the Ability of Facebook Ethical Communities to Strengthen Consumers’ Ethical Consumption Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 449-465, September.
    9. Jiaqi Liu & Zhenping Zhang & Jiayin Qi & Hong Wu & Manyi Chen, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Opinion Leaders’ Characteristics on Online Group Knowledge-Sharing Engagement from In-Group and Out-Group Perspectives: Evidence from a Chinese Online Knowledge-Sharing Com," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Adam Worrall & Alicia Cappello & Rachel Osolen, 2021. "The importance of socio‐emotional considerations in online communities, social informatics, and information science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1247-1260, October.
    11. Weiwei Yan & Xin Wen & Yin Zhang & Sonali Kudva & Qian Liu, 2023. "The dynamics of Q&A in academic social networking sites: insights from participants, interaction network, response time, and discipline differences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1895-1922, March.
    12. Kordzadeh, Nima & Warren, John & Seifi, Ali, 2016. "Antecedents of privacy calculus components in virtual health communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 724-734.
    13. Arun Kumar & Mrinalini Pandey, 2023. "Social Media and Impact of Altruistic Motivation, Egoistic Motivation, Subjective Norms, and EWOM toward Green Consumption Behavior: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, 2017. "Virtual Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing: Measurement Dilemmas," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 95-123.
    15. Junghwa Bahng & Chang Heon Lee, 2020. "Topic Modeling for Analyzing Patients’ Perceptions and Concerns of Hearing Loss on Social Q&A Sites: Incorporating Patients’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Yeganeh Charband & Nima Jafari Navimipour, 2016. "Online knowledge sharing mechanisms: a systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1131-1151, December.
    17. Qingchun Meng & Zhen Zhang & Xiaole Wan & Xiaoxia Rong, 2018. "Properties Exploring and Information Mining in Consumer Community Network: A Case of Huawei Pollen Club," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-19, November.
    18. Luo, Chuan & Lan, Yao & (Robert) Luo, Xin & Li, Han, 2021. "The effect of commitment on knowledge sharing: An empirical study of virtual communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Samer Faraj & Georg von Krogh & Eric Monteiro & Karim R. Lakhani, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 668-684, December.
    20. Qian Wu & Chei Sian Lee & Dion Hoe‐Lian Goh, 2023. "Understanding user‐generated questions in social Q&A: A goal‐framing approach," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 990-1009, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:204-:d:302553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.