IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4858-d293468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Submaximal Step Tests and the 6-Min Walk Test for Predicting Maximal Oxygen Consumption in Young and Healthy Participants

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Hyun Hong

    (Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, ICONS and Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Hyuk In Yang

    (Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, ICONS and Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Dong-Il Kim

    (Department of Professional Therapy, Graduate School of Professional Therapy, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 1342, Korea)

  • Tomas I. Gonzales

    (MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Soren Brage

    (MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

  • Justin Y. Jeon

    (Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, ICONS and Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea)

Abstract

Background : This study aimed to test the validity of three different submaximal tests (i.e., 3-min step test with 20.3-cm step box height (3MST 20 ), 3-min step test with 30-cm step box height (3MST 30 ), and 6-min walk test (6MWT)) in estimating maximal oxygen consumption (VO 2max ) in young and healthy individuals. Methods : The 3MST 20 , 3MST 30 , 6MWT, as well as the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were performed in 73 participants (37 men and 36 women; mean age: 30.8 ± 9.3 years). All participants visited the clinic three times in a random order for anthropometric measurements, three submaximal tests, and the VO 2max test. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to construct the VO 2max prediction equations for each submaximal test. Results : The prediction equations developed based on multiple regression analyses for each submaximal tests were as follows: 3MST 20 : VO 2max = 86.0 − 10.9 × sex (male = 1, female = 2) − 0.4 × age − 0.1 × weight − 0.1 × heart rate recovery at 30 s (HRR30s); 3MST 30 : VO 2max = 84.5 − 10.2 × sex (male = 1, female = 2) − 0.4 × age − 0.1 × weight − 0.1 × HRR30s; and 6MWT: VO 2max = 61.1 − 11.1 × sex (male = 1, female = 2) − 0.4 × age − 0.2 × weight − 0.2 × (distance walked·10 −1 ). The estimated VO 2max values based on formulated equations were 37.0 ± 7.9, 37.3 ± 7.6, and 36.9 ± 7.9 mL∙kg −1 ∙min −1 derived from the 3MST 20 , 3MST 30 , and 6MWT, respectively. These estimated VO 2max values were not significantly different from the measured VO 2max value, 37.3 mL∙kg −1 ∙min −1 . The estimated VO 2max based on the 3MST 20 , 3MST 30 , and 6MWT results explained 73.4%, 72.2%, and 74.4% of the variances in the measured VO 2max ( p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions : The 3MST 20 , 3MST 30 , and 6MWT were valid in estimating VO 2max in relatively young and healthy Asian individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Hyun Hong & Hyuk In Yang & Dong-Il Kim & Tomas I. Gonzales & Soren Brage & Justin Y. Jeon, 2019. "Validation of Submaximal Step Tests and the 6-Min Walk Test for Predicting Maximal Oxygen Consumption in Young and Healthy Participants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4858-:d:293468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Li & Chun-Hao Chang & Yu-Chun Chung & Huey-June Wu & Nai-Wen Kan & Wen-Sheng ChangChien & Chin-Shan Ho & Chi-Chang Huang, 2021. "Development and Validation of 3 Min Incremental Step-In-Place Test for Predicting Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Home Settings: A Submaximal Exercise Study to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Fang Li & Chun-Hao Chang & Chia-An Ho & Cheng-You Wu & Hung-Chih Yeh & Yuan-Shuo Chan & Jia-Yu Cheng & Wen-Sheng ChangChien & Chin-Shan Ho, 2022. "The Determination of Step Frequency in 3-min Incremental Step-in-Place Tests for Predicting Maximal Oxygen Uptake from Heart Rate Response in Taiwanese Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Joshua Qi Jun Tai & Shu Fen Wong & Steve Kin Ming Chow & Darine Hui Wen Choo & Hui Cheng Choo & Sofyan Sahrom & Abdul Rashid Aziz, 2022. "Assessing Physical Fitness of Athletes in a Confined Environment during Prolonged Self-Isolation: Potential Usefulness of the Test of Maximal Number of Burpees Performed in 3 Minutes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Txomin Pérez-Bilbao & David García-González & Álvaro Martos-Bermúdez & Sandra Nieto & Teresa del Campo & Margarita Pérez-Ruiz & Alejandro F. San Juan, 2021. "Effects of an Eight-Week Concurrent Training Program with Different Effort Character over Physical Fitness, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Lipid Profile among Hospital Workers: Preliminary Result," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Olha Podrihalo & Svetlana Savina & Leonid Podrigalo & Sergii Iermakov & Władysław Jagiełło & Łukasz Rydzik & Wiesław Błach, 2020. "Influence of Health Related Fitness on the Morphofunctional Condition of Second Mature Aged Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-9, November.
    6. Cheryl A. Howe & Riley J. Corrigan & Maya Djalali & Chris McManaway & Alexandra Grbcich & Grace Sam Aidoo, 2021. "Feasibility of Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Assessing Youth Weight and Health Status: Preliminary Findings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Ukbe Sirayder & Deniz Inal-Ince & Busra Kepenek-Varol & Cihangir Acik, 2022. "Long-Term Characteristics of Severe COVID-19: Respiratory Function, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4858-:d:293468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.