IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4762-d291669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future Directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart J.H. Biddle

    (Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • Jason A. Bennie

    (Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • Katrien De Cocker

    (Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • David Dunstan

    (Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Paul A. Gardiner

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Genevieve N. Healy

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Brigid Lynch

    (Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Neville Owen

    (Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Charlotte Brakenridge

    (The University of Queensland, RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Wendy Brown

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Matthew Buman

    (College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)

  • Bronwyn Clark

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Ing-Mari Dohrn

    (Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, 11330 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Mitch Duncan

    (Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Nicholas Gilson

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Tracy Kolbe-Alexander

    (Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • Toby Pavey

    (Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)

  • Natasha Reid

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Corneel Vandelanotte

    (School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia)

  • Ineke Vergeer

    (Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • Grace E. Vincent

    (School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia)

Abstract

The development in research concerning sedentary behaviour has been rapid over the past two decades. This has led to the development of evidence and views that have become more advanced, diverse and, possibly, contentious. These include the effects of standing, the breaking up of prolonged sitting and the role of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in the association between sedentary behaviour and health outcomes. The present aim is to report the views of experts (n = 21) brought together (one-day face-to-face meeting in 2018) to consider these issues and provide conclusions and recommendations for future work. Each topic was reviewed and presented by one expert followed by full group discussion, which was recorded, transcribed and analysed. The experts concluded that (a). standing may bring benefits that accrue from postural shifts. Prolonged (mainly static) standing and prolonged sitting are both bad for health; (b). ‘the best posture is the next posture’. Regularly breaking up of sitting with postural shifts and movement is vital; (c). health effects of prolonged sitting are evident even after controlling for MVPA, but high levels of MVPA can attenuate the deleterious effects of prolonged sitting depending on the health outcome of interest. Expert discussion addressed measurement, messaging and future directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart J.H. Biddle & Jason A. Bennie & Katrien De Cocker & David Dunstan & Paul A. Gardiner & Genevieve N. Healy & Brigid Lynch & Neville Owen & Charlotte Brakenridge & Wendy Brown & Matthew Buman & B, 2019. "Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future Directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4762-:d:291669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise Mansfield & Jennifer Hall & Lee Smith & Molly Rasch & Emily Reeves & Stephen Dewitt & Benjamin Gardner, 2018. "“Could you sit down please?” A qualitative analysis of employees’ experiences of standing in normally-seated workplace meetings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Samson O. Ojo & Daniel P. Bailey & Angel M. Chater & David J. Hewson, 2018. "The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentin Magnon & Guillaume T. Vallet & Frédéric Dutheil & Catherine Auxiette, 2021. "Sedentary Lifestyle Matters as Past Sedentariness, Not Current Sedentariness, Predicts Cognitive Inhibition Performance among College Students: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Ida H Danquah & Janne S Tolstrup, 2020. "Standing Meetings Are Feasible and Effective in Reducing Sitting Time among Office Workers—Walking Meetings Are Not: Mixed-Methods Results on the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Active Meetings Based," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-7, March.
    3. Lidewij R. Renaud & Maaike A. Huysmans & Hidde P. van der Ploeg & Erwin M. Speklé & Allard J. van der Beek, 2020. "Natural Patterns of Sitting, Standing and Stepping During and Outside Work—Differences between Habitual Users and Non-Users of Sit–Stand Workstations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Khansa Hayat & Maryam Hafeez & Kanwal Bilal & Malik Shahzad Shabbir, 2022. "Interactive Effects of Organizational Structure and Team Work Quality on Project Success in Project Based Non ProfitOrganizations," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(1), pages 84-103, March.
    5. Tao Huang & Qian Gu & Zhangyan Deng & Chilun Tsai & Yue Xue & Jimeng Zhang & Liye Zou & Zuosong Chen & Kun Wang, 2019. "Executive Function Performance in Young Adults When Cycling at an Active Workstation: An fNIRS Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Sara K. Rosenkranz & Emily L. Mailey & Emily Umansky & Richard R. Rosenkranz & Elizabeth Ablah, 2020. "Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Julia Lynch & Gráinne O’Donoghue & Casey L. Peiris, 2022. "Classroom Movement Breaks and Physically Active Learning Are Feasible, Reduce Sedentary Behaviour and Fatigue, and May Increase Focus in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Lidewij R Renaud & Erwin M Speklé & Allard J van der Beek & Hidde P van der Ploeg & H Roeline Pasman & Maaike A Huysmans, 2020. "The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4762-:d:291669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.