IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4643-d289708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘It Shouldn’t Be This Hard’: Exploring the Challenges of Rural Health Research

Author

Listed:
  • Heath Greville

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Emma Haynes

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Robin Kagie

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Sandra C Thompson

    (School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia
    Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald St, Geraldton 6530, Australia)

Abstract

Health research is important for innovation and assessment of health status and health interventions, and maintaining a strong, engaged cohort of rural health researchers is essential for the ongoing improvement of the health of rural populations. Ethical guidelines and processes ensure research is undertaken in a way that protects and, where possible, empowers participants. We set out to systematically examine and document the challenges posed by ethics and governance processes for rural health researchers in Western Australia (WA) and the impact on the research undertaken. In this qualitative study, fifteen WA-based rural health researchers were interviewed. The identified challenges included inefficient systems, gatekeeping, apparent resistance to research and the lack of research experience of those involved in approval processes. For researchers seeking to conduct studies to improve rural and Aboriginal health, extended delays in approvals can hold up and impede research, ultimately changing the nature of the research undertaken and constraining the willingness of practitioners and researchers to undertake health research. Unwieldy ethics processes were seen to have a particularly onerous impact on rural research pertaining to service delivery, multiple sites, and research involving Aboriginal people, impeding innovation and inquiry in areas where it is much needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Heath Greville & Emma Haynes & Robin Kagie & Sandra C Thompson, 2019. "‘It Shouldn’t Be This Hard’: Exploring the Challenges of Rural Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4643-:d:289708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haynes, Emma & Marawili, Minitja & Marika, Brendan Makungun & Mitchell, Alice G. & Phillips, Jodi & Bessarab, Dawn & Walker, Roz & Cook, Jeff & Ralph, Anna P., 2019. "Community-based participatory action research on rheumatic heart disease in an Australian Aboriginal homeland: Evaluation of the ‘On track watch’ project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 38-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavrencic, Louise M. & Donovan, Terrence & Moffatt, Lindy & Keiller, Tamara & Allan, Wendy & Delbaere, Kim & Radford, Kylie, 2021. "Ngarraanga Giinganay (‘thinking peacefully’): Co-design and pilot study of a culturally-grounded mindfulness-based stress reduction program with older First Nations Australians," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Kristina Vine & Tessa Benveniste & Shanthi Ramanathan & Jo Longman & Megan Williams & Alison Laycock & Veronica Matthews, 2023. "Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Haynes, Emma & Walker, Roz & Mitchell, Alice G. & Katzenellenbogen, Judy & D'Antoine, Heather & Bessarab, Dawn, 2021. "Decolonizing Indigenous health: Generating a productive dialogue to eliminate Rheumatic Heart Disease in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Tamara Butler & Alana Gall & Gail Garvey & Khwanruethai Ngampromwongse & Debra Hector & Scott Turnbull & Kerri Lucas & Caroline Nehill & Anna Boltong & Dorothy Keefe & Kate Anderson, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review of Optimal Approaches to Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-38, December.
    6. Emma Haynes & Alice Mitchell & Stephanie Enkel & Rosemary Wyber & Dawn Bessarab, 2020. "Voices behind the Statistics: A Systematic Literature Review of the Lived Experience of Rheumatic Heart Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Emma Haynes & Minitja Marawili & Makungun B. Marika & Alice Mitchell & Roz Walker & Judith M. Katzenellenbogen & Dawn Bessarab, 2022. "Living with Rheumatic Heart Disease at the Intersection of Biomedical and Aboriginal Worldviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Emma Haynes & Minitja Marawili & Alice Mitchell & Roz Walker & Judith Katzenellenbogen & Dawn Bessarab, 2022. "“Weaving a Mat That We Can All Sit On”: Qualitative Research Approaches for Productive Dialogue in the Intercultural Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Anna P. Ralph & Angela Kelly & Anne-Marie Lee & Valerina L. Mungatopi & Segora R. Babui & Nanda Kaji Budhathoki & Vicki Wade & Jessica L. de Dassel & Rosemary Wyber, 2022. "Evaluation of a Community-Led Program for Primordial and Primary Prevention of Rheumatic Fever in Remote Northern Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4643-:d:289708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.