IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i1p103-d194434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Europe Need an EU Product Safety Directive for Access Scaffolding?

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero

    (School of Industrial Engineering, C/ Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, Campus de Teatinos, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Manuel Suárez-Cebador

    (School of Industrial Engineering, C/ Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, Campus de Teatinos, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • María del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira

    (School of Industrial Engineering, C/ Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, Campus de Teatinos, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • José María De la Varga-Salto

    (School of Industrial Engineering, C/ Dr. Ortiz Ramos s/n, Campus de Teatinos, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Jesús Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos sn, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

The main requirement established for the development of European Union product safety directives is to ensure a high level of safety for users. This research aims to analyze whether Europe needs a product safety directive for scaffolding and identify the main factors to be defined in public policies on the use of standardized scaffolding in the absence of such a directive. The principal types of scaffolding were reviewed, along with European regulations, and their risk levels. Finally, a qualitative study using a panel of experts was conducted to determine the differences between types of scaffolding and whether the enactment of such a directive would be justified. Key results were that the risk level associated with scaffolding positioned it third or fourth between material agents more hazardous in relation to falls from height. There is no existing product safety directive for scaffolding, despite the fact that there are directives for other products less dangerous than or as dangerous as scaffolding. However, there are noncompulsory standards EN 12810-1-2 and EN 12811-1-2-3-4 for scaffolding, which would form the basis of the essential requirements contained in a directive if it were created. The experts highlighted significant differences between “standardized” and “nonstandardized” scaffolding, with higher safety levels and productivity, and better maintenance, inspection, assembly, and dismantling associated with the former, and lower costs with the latter. Thus, they found that the enacting of an EU product safety directive for scaffolding would be justifiable, and in its absence supported the promotion of the use of standardized scaffolding.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero & Manuel Suárez-Cebador & María del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira & José María De la Varga-Salto & Jesús Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo, 2019. "Does Europe Need an EU Product Safety Directive for Access Scaffolding?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:103-:d:194434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Hsiu Hung & Tonya Smith-Jackson & Woodrow Winchester, 2011. "Use of attitude congruence to identify safety interventions for small residential builders," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 113-130.
    2. Mengchun Zhang & Dongping Fang, 2013. "A cognitive analysis of why Chinese scaffolders do not use safety harnesses in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 207-222, March.
    3. Aneziris, O.N. & Topali, E. & Papazoglou, I.A., 2012. "Occupational risk of building construction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 36-46.
    4. Evan A. Nadhim & Carol Hon & Bo Xia & Ian Stewart & Dongping Fang, 2016. "Falls from Height in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review of the Scientific Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mara Lombardi & Mario Fargnoli & Giuseppe Parise, 2019. "Risk Profiling from the European Statistics on Accidents at Work (ESAW) Accidents′ Databases: A Case Study in Construction Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Ying-Hua Huang & Theresia Avila Bria & Ying-Hsiu Lin, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Safety Climate and Worker Safety Behavior on Building Construction Sites in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Gui Ye & Hongzhe Yue & Jingjing Yang & Hongyang Li & Qingting Xiang & Yuan Fu & Can Cui, 2020. "Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Ting-Min Hsieh & Ching-Hua Tsai & Hang-Tsung Liu & Chun-Ying Huang & Sheng-En Chou & Wei-Ti Su & Shiun-Yuan Hsu & Ching-Hua Hsieh, 2020. "Effect of Height of Fall on Mortality in Patients with Fall Accidents: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Kriengsak Panuwatwanich & Natapit Roongsrisoothiwong & Kawin Petcharayuthapant & Sirikwan Dummanonda & Sherif Mohamed, 2020. "Ambient Intelligence to Improve Construction Site Safety: Case of High-Rise Building in Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Shengyu Guo & Jiali He & Jichao Li & Bing Tang, 2019. "Exploring the Impact of Unsafe Behaviors on Building Construction Accidents Using a Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Guo, Shengyu & Zhou, Xinyu & Tang, Bing & Gong, Peisong, 2020. "Exploring the behavioral risk chains of accidents using complex network theory in the construction industry," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    7. Minsu Lee & Jaemin Jeong & Jaewook Jeong & Jaehyun Lee, 2021. "Exploring Fatalities and Injuries in Construction by Considering Thermal Comfort Using Uncertainty and Relative Importance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-30, May.
    8. Albert P. C. Chan & Junfeng Guan & Tracy N. Y. Choi & Yang Yang & Guangdong Wu & Edmond Lam, 2023. "Improving Safety Performance of Construction Workers through Learning from Incidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Aminu Darda’u Rafindadi & Nasir Shafiq & Idris Othman & Miljan Mikić, 2023. "Mechanism Models of the Conventional and Advanced Methods of Construction Safety Training. Is the Traditional Method of Safety Training Sufficient?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Banus Kam Leung Low & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan & Saad Alabdulkarim, 2019. "Construction Worker Risk-Taking Behavior Model with Individual and Organizational Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Xiuyu Wu & Hongping Yuan & Ge Wang & Shuquan Li & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Impacts of Lean Construction on Safety Systems: A System Dynamics Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. S M Jamil Uddin & Alex Albert & Abdullah Alsharef & Bhavana Pandit & Yashwardhan Patil & Chukwuma Nnaji, 2020. "Hazard Recognition Patterns Demonstrated by Construction Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Tong, Ruipeng & Yang, Xiaoyi & Li, Hongwei & Li, Jianfei, 2019. "Dual process management of coal miners’ unsafe behaviour in the Chinese context: Evidence from a meta-analysis and inspired by the JD-R model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 205-217.
    14. G.K. Koulinas & O.E. Demesouka & P.K. Marhavilas & A.P. Vavatsikos & D.E. Koulouriotis, 2019. "Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. F. T. T. Phua, 2017. "Does the built-environment industry attract risk-taking individuals?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 207-217, April.
    16. Marhavilas, P.K. & Koulouriotis, D.E. & Spartalis, S.H., 2013. "Harmonic analysis of occupational-accident time-series as a part of the quantified risk evaluation in worksites: Application on electric power industry and construction sector," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 8-25.
    17. Runhao Guo & Heng Li & Dongliang Han & Runze Liu, 2023. "Feasibility Analysis of Using Channel State Information (CSI) Acquired from Wi-Fi Routers for Construction Worker Fall Detection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Mohd Saidin Misnan & Sarajul Fikri Mohamed & Zuhaili Mohamad Ramly & Fara Diva Mustapa & Georgenia Bonggi, 2024. "Safety and Health Cost Components for Scaffolding Works in Construction Projects," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 1785-1798, August.
    19. Tingru Zhang & Zhaopeng Liu & Shiwen Zheng & Xingda Qu & Da Tao, 2020. "Predicting Errors, Violations, and Safety Participation Behavior at Nuclear Power Plants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Aminu Darda’u Rafindadi & Nasir Shafiq & Idris Othman, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework for BIM Process Flow to Mitigate the Causes of Fall-Related Accidents at the Design Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-37, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:103-:d:194434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.