IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i11p2352-d178124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of the Relationships between the Characteristics of the Village Population Structure and Rural Residential Solid Waste Collection Services: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Sha Cao

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, #9, Block 4, Renminnan Road, Chengdu 610041, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Dingde Xu

    (Sichuan Center for Rural Development Research, College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211 Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Shaoquan Liu

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, #9, Block 4, Renminnan Road, Chengdu 610041, China)

Abstract

Based on survey data collected in 2016 from 100 villages across five provinces in China, this paper uses binary logistic model to explore the main factors related to the supply and quality of rural residential solid waste collection (RRSWC) services, especially focusing on the role of village population structure characteristics. It is indicated from the results that village population structure characteristics are significantly correlated with RRSWC services; specifically: (1) the total registered population of village households is significantly positively correlated with the supply of RRSWC services, however, the correlation between the registered population and the quality of RRSWC services is negative and the more the labors working and living outside the village, the less likely the village is to provide RRSWC services; (2) the villagers’ educational levels and RRSWC services show no significant correlativity at the present stage; (3) the preferential policies brought by population structure advantage play a positive role in the supply of RRSWC services but is not clearly related to the quality of RRSWC services, especially in the villages with a larger minority population. In addition, the study finds that, the economic development level of a village and the characteristics of village leaders are also positively correlated with the supply and quality of RRSWC services and; the natural and traffic conditions have no significant correlation with RRSWC services. This study can act as a reference for the further promotion of the development of RRSWC services in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Sha Cao & Dingde Xu & Shaoquan Liu, 2018. "A Study of the Relationships between the Characteristics of the Village Population Structure and Rural Residential Solid Waste Collection Services: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2352-:d:178124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/11/2352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aphale, Omkar & Thyberg, Krista L. & Tonjes, David J., 2015. "Differences in waste generation, waste composition, and source separation across three waste districts in a New York suburb," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 19-28.
    2. Zeng, Chao & Niu, Dongjie & Li, Hangfen & Zhou, Tao & Zhao, Youcai, 2016. "Public perceptions and economic values of source-separated collection of rural solid waste: A pilot study in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 166-173.
    3. Florin Constantin Mihai, 2017. "Waste collection in rural communities: challenges under EU regulations. A Case study of Neamt County, Romania," Post-Print hal-01546793, HAL.
    4. Dan Pan & Ruiyao Ying & Zuhui Huang, 2017. "Determinants of Residential Solid Waste Management Services Provision: A Village-Level Analysis in Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Aiqin Wang & Linxiu Zhang & Yaojiang Shi & Scott Rozelle & Annie Osborn & Meredith Yang, 2017. "Rural Solid Waste Management in China: Status, Problems and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Boonrod, K. & Towprayoon, S. & Bonnet, S. & Tripetchkul, S., 2015. "Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 77-90.
    7. Chunhui Ye & Ping Qin, 2008. "Provision of Residential Solid Waste Management Service in Rural China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 16(5), pages 118-128, September.
    8. Jing Ma & Keith W. Hipel & Mark L. Hanson, 2017. "Public participation in municipal solid waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China: status and influencing factors," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(12), pages 2174-2191, December.
    9. Simona Ciuta & Tiberiu Apostol & Valentin Rusu, 2015. "Urban and Rural MSW Stream Characterization for Separate Collection Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. MIHAI, Florin Constantin & Grozavu, Adrian, 2019. "Role of Waste Collection Efficiency in Providing a Cleaner Rural Environment," SocArXiv mjk7g_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Chen Qing & Shili Guo & Xin Deng & Dingde Xu, 2022. "Farmers’ awareness of environmental protection and rural residential environment improvement: a case study of Sichuan province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11301-11319, September.
    3. Dan Pan & Huan Chen & Guzhen Zhou & Fanbin Kong, 2020. "Determinants of Public-Private Partnership Adoption in Solid Waste Management in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Wenyan Wu & Lu Li & Hanxin Chen & Minyue Xu & Yalin Yuan, 2022. "Farmers’ Preference for Participating in Rural Solid Waste Management: A Case Study from Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Khandoker M. Maniruzzaman & Umar Lawal Dano & Faez S. AlShihri & Maher S. AlShammari & Sayed Mohammed S. Ahmed & Wadee Ahmed Ghanem Al-Gehlani & Tareq I. Alrawaf, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aiqin Wang & Linxiu Zhang & Yaojiang Shi & Scott Rozelle & Annie Osborn & Meredith Yang, 2017. "Rural Solid Waste Management in China: Status, Problems and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Zeng, Chao & Niu, Dongjie & Li, Hangfen & Zhou, Tao & Zhao, Youcai, 2016. "Public perceptions and economic values of source-separated collection of rural solid waste: A pilot study in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 166-173.
    3. Andreea Simona Saseanu & Rodica-Manuela Gogonea & Simona Ioana Ghita & Radu Şerban Zaharia, 2019. "The Impact of Education and Residential Environment on Long-Term Waste Management Behavior in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Bo Zhou & Fang Qi & Muhammad Faraz Riaz & Tariq Ali, 2022. "An Analysis of the Factors behind Rural Residents’ Satisfaction with Residential Waste Management in Jiangxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Guang Han & Ping Zhai & Liqun Zhu & Kongqing Li, 2023. "Economic Incentives, Reputation Incentives, and Rural Residents’ Participation in Household Waste Classification: Evidence from Jiangsu, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Yanqing Song & Han Bao & Shan Shen, 2022. "Understanding the Influence of Initial Values of College Students in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Paul Taboada-González & Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Liliana Márquez-Benavides, 2017. "Recyclables Valorisation as the Best Strategy for Achieving Landfill CO 2 e Emissions Abatement from Domestic Waste: Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Mihai, Florin-Constantin & Iatu, Corneliu & Grozavu, Adrian, 2018. "Rural waste disposal issues within urban borders," MPRA Paper 87955, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Giucă Andreea Daniela, 2023. "Economic Analysis of the Waste Market in Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 498-511, July.
    11. Xuemeng Zhang & Chao Liu & Yuexi Chen & Guanghong Zheng & Yinguang Chen, 2022. "Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11471-11513, October.
    12. Yufeng Li & Ziwei Huang & Yonghang Li & Pu Xu, 2022. "Research on the Long-Term Governance Mechanism of Urban and Rural Living Environment Based on the Ordered Logistic-ISM Model in the Perspective of Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Wei Xia, 2021. "How Do Network Embeddedness and Environmental Awareness Affect Farmers’ Participation in Improving Rural Human Settlements?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Dan Pan & Huan Chen & Guzhen Zhou & Fanbin Kong, 2020. "Determinants of Public-Private Partnership Adoption in Solid Waste Management in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Su, Guandong & Chan, Claire & He, Jianzhong, 2022. "Enhanced biobutanol production from starch waste via orange peel doping," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 576-583.
    16. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2020. "Assessment of COVID-19 Waste Flows During the Emergency State in Romania and Related Public Health and Environmental Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Changjun Li & Firooz Firoozmand & Marie K. Harder, 2021. "The Impacts of Shanghai’s July 2019 Municipal Domestic Waste Management Regulations on Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Wenyan Wu & Lu Li & Hanxin Chen & Minyue Xu & Yalin Yuan, 2022. "Farmers’ Preference for Participating in Rural Solid Waste Management: A Case Study from Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Yanyan Guo & Ran Wei & Xingqing Zhang & Fuliang Chai & Youcai Zhao & Tao Zhou, 2022. "Positive Impacts of the Overall-Process Management Measures on Promoting Municipal Solid Waste Classification: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    20. Mihai, Florin-Constantin & Ingrao, Carlo, 2016. "Assessment of biowaste losses through unsound waste management practices in rural areas and the role of home composting," MPRA Paper 74854, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2352-:d:178124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.