IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14250-d959692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive Impacts of the Overall-Process Management Measures on Promoting Municipal Solid Waste Classification: A Case Study of Chongqing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanyan Guo

    (The State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Green Building Technology, Fujian Academy of Building Research Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Ran Wei

    (The State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xingqing Zhang

    (Chongqing Environment and Sanitation Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400016, China)

  • Fuliang Chai

    (Chongqing Environment and Sanitation Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400016, China)

  • Youcai Zhao

    (The State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Tao Zhou

    (The State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) classification is a national strategic objective and an important component of successful municipal solid waste management (MSWM). Some failures of pilot programs suggest that safeguarding measures are essential for MSW classification. A questionnaire survey of public awareness and attitudes toward MSW source-separated collection in Chongqing’s main districts was conducted, and the results indicated that the proportions of respondents willing to participate in MSW classification and provide money for it were 67.9% and 86.2%, respectively. The positive impacts of the overall-process management measures on promoting MSW classification in Chongqing’s main districts, including source-separated collection system, transportation system, treatment and disposal system, and environmental sanitation prevention system, were analyzed comprehensively. The analyses revealed that a 98% resident participation rate was obtained for MSW source-separated collection with the application of a cloud-based platform and traceability system. Moreover, the secondary transportation and comprehensive “4 + 1” (four waste incineration plants and one waste landfill) disposal mode showed significant advantages with respect to costs and environmental friendliness. In view of the environmental sanitation risks, the prevention and control of environmental sanitation were developed in Chongqing. The future prospects have also been discussed. The refinement and regionalization of source-separated collection are proposed as the possible solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanyan Guo & Ran Wei & Xingqing Zhang & Fuliang Chai & Youcai Zhao & Tao Zhou, 2022. "Positive Impacts of the Overall-Process Management Measures on Promoting Municipal Solid Waste Classification: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14250-:d:959692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Li'ao & Hu, Gang & Gong, Xun & Bao, Liang, 2009. "Emission reductions potential for energy from municipal solid waste incineration in Chongqing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2074-2079.
    2. Luigi Vimercati & Antonio Baldassarre & Maria Franca Gatti & Luigi De Maria & Antonio Caputi & Angelica A. Dirodi & Francesco Cuccaro & Raffaello Maria Bellino, 2016. "Respiratory Health in Waste Collection and Disposal Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Zhang, Suopeng & Zhang, Mingli & Yu, Xueying & Ren, Hao, 2016. "What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 176-186.
    4. Zeng, Chao & Niu, Dongjie & Li, Hangfen & Zhou, Tao & Zhao, Youcai, 2016. "Public perceptions and economic values of source-separated collection of rural solid waste: A pilot study in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 166-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iacopo Odoardi & Chiara Burlina & Alessandro Crociata, 2023. "Pro-Environmental Determinants of Waste Separation: Does the Interaction of Human and Social Capital Matter? Evidence from Italian Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Botakoz Suleimenova & Berik Aimbetov & Daulet Zhakupov & Dhawal Shah & Yerbol Sarbassov, 2022. "Co-Firing of Refuse-Derived Fuel with Ekibastuz Coal in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor: Analysis of Emissions and Ash Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Tian, Xi & Wu, Yufeng & Qu, Shen & Liang, Sai & Xu, Ming & Zuo, Tieyong, 2016. "The disposal and willingness to pay for residents scrap fluorescent lamps in China: A case study of Beijing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 103-111.
    3. Lee, Stacy H.N. & Chang, Hyo Jung (Julie) & Zhao, Li, 2023. "The importance of personal norms and situational expectancies to sustainable behaviors: The norm activation and situational expectancy-value theories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Liyuan Liu & Yen Hsu, 2022. "Motivating factors behind the public’s use of smart recycling systems: perceived playfulness and environmental concern," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Geng, Yuhuan & Tao, Jin, 2011. "Energy saving and emission reduction: A project of coal-resource integration in Shanxi Province, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3029-3032, June.
    6. Wang, Wei & Wu, Yufeng, 2017. "An overview of recycling and treatment of spent LiFePO4 batteries in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 233-243.
    7. Maria Giuseppina Bartolo & Rocco Servidio & Anna Lisa Palermiti & Maria Rosaria Nappa & Angela Costabile, 2023. "Pro-Environmental Behaviors and Well-Being in Adolescence: The Mediating Role of Place Attachment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Yang, Xisi & Thøgersen, John, 2022. "When people are green and greedy: A new perspective of recycling rewards and crowding-out in Germany, the USA and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 217-235.
    9. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Wei Xia, 2021. "How Do Network Embeddedness and Environmental Awareness Affect Farmers’ Participation in Improving Rural Human Settlements?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Lizin, Sebastien & Van Dael, Miet & Van Passel, Steven, 2017. "Battery pack recycling: Behaviour change interventions derived from an integrative theory of planned behaviour study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 66-82.
    11. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Liu, Boyu & Li, Yan & Ni, Ruiyan & Wang, Yi, 2023. "What influences residents’ intention to participate in the electric vehicle battery recycling? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Aijun Liu & Maurice Osewe & Huixin Wang & Hang Xiong, 2020. "Rural Residents’ Awareness of Environmental Protection and Waste Classification Behavior in Jiangsu, China: An Empirical Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Zengwei Xu & Shanshan Miao, 2022. "Effect of Public Space on Collective Action for Rural Waste Management and the Mediating Effects of Social Capital," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Ya Huang & Zhangbao Zhong, 2023. "How Does Policy Support Affect the Behavior and Effectiveness of Domestic Waste Classification? The Mediating Role of Environmental Protection Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Wenyan Wu & Lu Li & Hanxin Chen & Minyue Xu & Yalin Yuan, 2022. "Farmers’ Preference for Participating in Rural Solid Waste Management: A Case Study from Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Pinyi Su & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Nadeem & Shamsheer ul Haq, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Law in Farmers’ Environment-Protecting Intentions and Behavior Based on Their Legal Cognition: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Lingyun Mi & Yuhuan Sun & Lijie Qiao & Tianwen Jia & Yang Yang & Tao Lv, 2021. "Analysis of the Cause of Household Carbon Lock-In for Chinese Urban Households," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Jing Shen & Donghui Zheng & Xiaoning Zhang & Mei Qu, 2020. "Investigating Rural Domestic Waste Sorting Intentions Based on an Integrative Framework of Planned Behavior Theory and Normative Activation Models: Evidence from Guanzhong Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Gang Li & Mengyu Lu & Sen Lai & Yonghong Li, 2023. "Research on Power Battery Recycling in the Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Pengfei Fan & Lili Ren & Xihao Zeng, 2024. "Resident Participation in Environmental Governance of Sustainable Tourism in Rural Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14250-:d:959692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.