IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i10p1275-d116070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of a Video-Versus Text-Based Computer-Tailored Intervention for Obesity Prevention after One Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Kei Long Cheung

    (Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Inga Schwabe

    (Department of Methodology and Statistics, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences (TSB), Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Michel J. L. Walthouwer

    (Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Anke Oenema

    (Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Lilian Lechner

    (Department of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Hein De Vries

    (Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Computer-tailored programs may help to prevent overweight and obesity, which are worldwide public health problems. This study investigated (1) the 12-month effectiveness of a video- and text-based computer-tailored intervention on energy intake, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI), and (2) the role of educational level in intervention effects. A randomized controlled trial in The Netherlands was conducted, in which adults were allocated to a video-based condition, text-based condition, or control condition, with baseline, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up. Outcome variables were self-reported BMI, physical activity, and energy intake. Mixed-effects modelling was used to investigate intervention effects and potential interaction effects. Compared to the control group, the video intervention group was effective regarding energy intake after 6 months (least squares means (LSM) difference = −205.40, p = 0.00) and 12 months (LSM difference = −128.14, p = 0.03). Only video intervention resulted in lower average daily energy intake after one year (d = 0.12). Educational role and BMI did not seem to interact with this effect. No intervention effects on BMI and physical activity were found. The video computer-tailored intervention was effective on energy intake after one year. This effect was not dependent on educational levels or BMI categories, suggesting that video tailoring can be effective for a broad range of risk groups and may be preferred over text tailoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Kei Long Cheung & Inga Schwabe & Michel J. L. Walthouwer & Anke Oenema & Lilian Lechner & Hein De Vries, 2017. "Effectiveness of a Video-Versus Text-Based Computer-Tailored Intervention for Obesity Prevention after One Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1275-:d:116070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenth, Russell V., 2016. "Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 69(i01).
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9988 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniëlle N. Zijlstra & Catherine A. W. Bolman & Jean W. M. Muris & Hein de Vries, 2021. "The Usability of an Online Tool to Promote the Use of Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jiyuan & Tang, Hailong & Chen, Min, 2019. "Linear substitute model-based uncertainty analysis of complicated non-linear energy system performance (case study of an adaptive cycle engine)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 87-108.
    2. Dario Priolo & Ciro Tolisano & Monica Brienza & Daniele Del Buono, 2024. "Insight into the Biostimulant Effect of an Aqueous Duckweed Extract on Tomato Plants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Sean Coogan & Zhixian Sui & David Raubenheimer, 2018. "Gluttony and guilt: monthly trends in internet search query data are comparable with national-level energy intake and dieting behavior," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Paul E. Rose & James E. Brereton & Lewis J. Rowden & Ricardo Lemos Figueiredo & Lisa M. Riley, 2019. "What’s new from the zoo? An analysis of ten years of zoo-themed research output," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Stella D. Juventia & Sarah K. Jones & Marie-Angélique Laporte & Roseline Remans & Chiara Villani & Natalia Estrada-Carmona, 2020. "Text Mining National Commitments towards Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Claire H Luby & Julie C Dawson & Irwin L Goldman, 2016. "Assessment and Accessibility of Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity of Carrot (Daucus carota L. var. sativus) Cultivars Commercially Available in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ng'ombe, John, 2019. "Economics of the Greenseeder Hand Planter, Discrete Choice Modeling, and On-Farm Field Experimentation," Thesis Commons jckt7, Center for Open Science.
    8. Šoltés Erik & Zelinová Silvia & Bilíková Mária, 2019. "General Linear Model: An Effective Tool For Analysis Of Claim Severity In Motor Third Party Liability Insurance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(4), pages 13-31, December.
    9. Anna Zimmermann & Julian E. Prieto-Vivas & Charlotte Cautereels & Anton Gorkovskiy & Jan Steensels & Yves Peer & Kevin J. Verstrepen, 2023. "A Cas3-base editing tool for targetable in vivo mutagenesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Gizachew Kebede Biratu & Eyasu Elias & Pheneas Ntawuruhunga & Nhamo Nhamo, 2018. "Effect of Chicken Manure Application on Cassava Biomass and Root Yields in Two Agro-Ecologies of Zambia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Muhammad Javed ASIF & Deivaseeno Dorairaj & Ratnam Wickneswari, 2017. "Characterization of natural provenances of Acacia mangium Willd. and Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. in Malaysia based on phenotypic traits," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 562-576.
    12. Xie, Xiaohong & Osińska, Magdalena & Szczepaniak, Małgorzata, 2023. "Do young generations save for retirement? Ensuring financial security of Gen Z and Gen Y," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 644-668.
    13. Belinda A Wilson & Maldwyn J Evans & William G Batson & Sam C Banks & Iain J Gordon & Donald B Fletcher & Claire Wimpenny & Jenny Newport & Emily Belton & Annette Rypalski & Tim Portas & Adrian D Mann, 2020. "Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Poonam Nasipuri & Jakob Herschend & Asker D Brejnrod & Jonas S Madsen & Roall Espersen & Birte Svensson & Mette Burmølle & Samuel Jacquiod & Søren J Sørensen, 2020. "Community-intrinsic properties enhance keratin degradation from bacterial consortia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Patrizia Piotti & Juliane Kaminski, 2016. "Do Dogs Provide Information Helpfully?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Muhammad Majid & Muqarrab Ali & Khurram Shahzad & Fiaz Ahmad & Rao Muhammad Ikram & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Ibrahim A. Alaraidh & Abdulrahman Al-hashimi & Hayssam M. Ali & Tayebeh Zarei & Rahul Datta & Sha, 2020. "Mitigation of Osmotic Stress in Cotton for the Improvement in Growth and Yield through Inoculation of Rhizobacteria and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Coated Diammonium Phosphate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Takahiro Miura & Naoyuki Okochi & Junya Suzuki & Tohru Ifukube, 2023. "Binaural Listening with Head Rotation Helps Persons with Blindness Perceive Narrow Obstacles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Deschaintres, Elodie & Morency, Catherine & Trépanier, Martin, 2022. "Cross-analysis of the variability of travel behaviors using one-day trip diaries and longitudinal data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 228-246.
    19. Frank Schaarschmidt, 2017. "Multiple treatment comparisons in analysis of covariance with interaction," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 609-628, November.
    20. Santiago José Elías Velazco & Franklin Galvão & Fabricio Villalobos & Paulo De Marco Júnior, 2017. "Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1275-:d:116070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.