IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i12p1230-d84962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disadvantaged Social Groups and the Cigarette Epidemic: Limits of the Diffusion of Innovations Vision

Author

Listed:
  • Myriam Khlat

    (Institut national d’études démographiques (Ined), 133 boulevard Davout, Paris 75020, France)

  • Fred Pampel

    (Population Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80302, USA)

  • Damien Bricard

    (Institut national d’études démographiques (Ined), 133 boulevard Davout, Paris 75020, France
    Institut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé (Irdes), 117 bis rue Manin, Paris 75019, France)

  • Stéphane Legleye

    (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (Insee), 6 Rue Legrand, Malakoff 92240, France
    Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), Faculté de médecine—Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de médecine—UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif 94805, France)

Abstract

The original four-stage model of the cigarette epidemic has been extended with diffusion of innovations theory to reflect socio-economic differences in cigarette use. Recently, two revisions of the model have been proposed: (1) separate analysis of the epidemic stages for men and women, in order to improve generalization to developing countries, and; (2) addition of a fifth stage to the smoking epidemic, in order to account for the persistence of smoking in disadvantaged social groups. By developing a cohort perspective spanning a 35-year time period in France and the USA, we uncover distinctive features which challenge the currently held vision on the evolution of smoking inequalities within the framework of the cigarette epidemic. We argue that the reason for which the model may not be fit to the lower educated is that the imitation mechanism underlying the diffusion of innovations works well with regard to adoption of the habit, but is much less relevant with regard to its rejection. Based on those observations, we support the idea that the nature and timing of the epidemic differs enough to treat the stages separately for high and low education groups, and discuss policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Myriam Khlat & Fred Pampel & Damien Bricard & Stéphane Legleye, 2016. "Disadvantaged Social Groups and the Cigarette Epidemic: Limits of the Diffusion of Innovations Vision," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:12:p:1230-:d:84962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/12/1230/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/12/1230/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrieri, Vincenzo & Jones, Andrew M., 2016. "Smoking for the poor and vaping for the rich? Distributional concerns for novel nicotine delivery systems," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 71-74.
    2. Dixon, Jane & Banwell, Cathy, 2009. "Theory driven research designs for explaining behavioural health risk transitions: The case of smoking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2206-2214, June.
    3. Sandra Kuntsche & Gerhard Gmel, 2005. "The smoking epidemic in Switzerland - an empirical examination of the theory of diffusion of innovations," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 50(6), pages 344-354, December.
    4. Patrick Peretti-Watel & Jean Constance, 2009. "“It’s All We Got Left”. Why Poor Smokers are Less Sensitive to Cigarette Price Increases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Carrieri, V. & Jones, A.M., 2016. "Smoking for the poor and vaping for the rich? Distributional concerns of new smoking methods," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/10, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damien Bricard & Stéphane Legleye & Myriam Khlat, 2017. "Changes in Smoking Behavior over Family Transitions: Evidence for Anticipation and Adaptation Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carnazza, Giovanni & Liberati, Paolo & Resce, Giuliano & Molinaro, Sabrina, 2021. "Smoking and income distribution: Inequalities in new and old products," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 261-268.
    2. Carrieri, V.; Jones, A.M.;, 2017. "Intergenerational transmission of nicotine within families: have e-cigarettes had an impact?," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/03, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    3. Carrieri, Vincenzo & Jones, Andrew M., 2018. "Intergenerational transmission of nicotine within families: Have e-cigarettes influenced passive smoking?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 83-93.
    4. Cinzia Novi & Rowena Jacobs & Matteo Migheli, 2020. "Smoking inequality across genders and socio-economic positions. Evidence from Italian data," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 177-203, October.
    5. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Bastian, Christopher T. & Devadoss, Stephen, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis of Tobacco Addiction," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304425, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. John Buckell & Joachim Marti & Jody L. Sindelar, 2017. "Should Flavors be Banned in E-cigarettes? Evidence on Adult Smokers and Recent Quitters from a Discrete Choice Experiment," NBER Working Papers 23865, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Otto Ruokolainen & Antero Heloma & Pekka Jousilahti & Jouni Lahti & Oona Pentala-Nikulainen & Ossi Rahkonen & Pekka Puska, 2019. "Thirty-eight-year trends of educational differences in smoking in Finland," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(6), pages 853-860, July.
    8. Lucio Esposito & Shatakshee Dhongde & Christopher Millett, 2021. "Smoking habits in Mexico: Upward and downward comparisons of economic status," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1558-1575, August.
    9. Aristides Dos Santos, Anderson Moreira & Triaca, Lívia Madeira & Leivas, Pedro Henrique Soares, 2023. "How is smoking distributed in relation to socioeconomic status? Evidence from Brazil in the years 2013 and 2019," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    10. Johannes Klotz & Gabriele Doblhammer, 2008. "Trends in educational mortality differentials in Austria between 1981/82 and 2001/2002," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(51), pages 1759-1780.
    11. Joachim Marti & John Buckell & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Jody Sindelar, 2019. "To “Vape” Or Smoke? Experimental Evidence On Adult Smokers," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 705-725, January.
    12. Paolo Liberati & Francesco Crespi & Massimo Paradiso & Simone Tedeschi & Antonio Scialà, 2018. "Smokers Are Different: The Heterogeneity Of Smokers’ Responses To Price Increases," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0237, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    13. Carnazza, Giovanni & Liberati, Paolo & Resce, Giuliano, 2023. "Income-related inequality in smoking habits: A comparative assessment in the European Union," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 34-41.
    14. Pound, Pandora & Campbell, Rona, 2015. "Exploring the feasibility of theory synthesis: A worked example in the field of health related risk-taking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 57-65.
    15. Giuliano Resce & Raffaele Lagravinese & Elisa Benedetti & Sabrina Molinaro, 2019. "Income-related inequality in gambling: evidence from Italy," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1107-1131, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:12:p:1230-:d:84962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.